If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Biplanes and Triplanes were the best !
I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made.
I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Alberto Panno-Peano" wrote in message om... I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! Score on Trollmeter 1/10 - Very Poor Effort Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Alberto Panno-Peano" wrote in message om... I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! Saw an interesting documentary on Discovery channel called Great Military Clashes. The episode focused on WWI, and started with the German Howitzer versus the British 18 pounder field gun. The second half was the Fokker triplane versus Sopwith Camel. In the end it came down to speed - the drag of three wings of the triplane limited the designs speed. It had an advantage in climb and turning, but speed is life. The wings also made take off and landing difficult as they blocked the view of the runway. The red baron was a superb pilot who could make the most of his airplane. Interestingly enough they speculated that the Fokker was inspired by an earlier Sopwith Triplane, which didn't have as man vices in the visibility department. But it was abandoned in favour of the biplane because of speed. James Linn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..
On 18 Jan 2004 02:01:52 -0800, (Alberto Panno-Peano) wrote: I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. You should have just said were some of the best planes ever made. No argument there. Lots of civilian pilots fly WW1 replicas and they are crowd pleasers. My fave, contrary to what the RAM anti-German fanatics think I will say, is NOT the Fokker D.VII. I always liked the Albatros D.Va even with the annoying wing strut problem. If I had the money I'd buy one today and paint it up the way they did back then. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! Sorry, not even Erich Hartmann with 352 kills would score with a Me-109 today. We'll have to wait for WW3 and see if the Germans will invent new aircraft firing "swarmers" (aka KKVs: Kinetic Kill Vehicles) that will down 10-12 enemy aircraft at a time. Wouldn't that be interesting? 35 missions and a new top ace is born!!! (Just a JOKE guys, so don't even think about flaming)... I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! The new Zeppelin and plans for even larger types from around the world arouse great interest but lack suitable funding. It WOULD be absolutely amazing to fly in an 800+ ft long Zeppelin across the Atlantic. That IMO is comparable to those that flew on the Concorde. That's nice. My God, YES it would be nice Al! Al Minyard Rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Alan Minyard wrote: On 18 Jan 2004 02:01:52 -0800, (Alberto Panno-Peano) wrote: I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! That's nice. Doesn't even produce a twitch of the trollometer needle. I don't reckon this one has a bridge yet. Perhaps a culvert. Or a drain. -- Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/ "Time has stopped, says the Black Lion clock and eternity has begun" (Dylan Thomas) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
robert arndt wrote:
The new Zeppelin and plans for even larger types from around the world arouse great interest but lack suitable funding. It WOULD be absolutely amazing to fly in an 800+ ft long Zeppelin across the Atlantic. That IMO is comparable to those that flew on the Concorde. Especially traveling at mach 2! Is there no end to advanced German technical achievement? SMH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Closeup examination of the Dr.1 at Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome indicates
that its main airfoils had far less wire bracing than any Sopwith design (can't recall if Rhinebeck has a Camel or not at the moment). Were the differences in parasitic drag enough to cause difference in max attainable speed? Memory suggests that Rhinebeck's airframes are as faithful to original as can be found anywhere. James Linn wrote: "Alberto Panno-Peano" wrote in message om... I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! Saw an interesting documentary on Discovery channel called Great Military Clashes. The episode focused on WWI, and started with the German Howitzer versus the British 18 pounder field gun. The second half was the Fokker triplane versus Sopwith Camel. In the end it came down to speed - the drag of three wings of the triplane limited the designs speed. It had an advantage in climb and turning, but speed is life. The wings also made take off and landing difficult as they blocked the view of the runway. The red baron was a superb pilot who could make the most of his airplane. Interestingly enough they speculated that the Fokker was inspired by an earlier Sopwith Triplane, which didn't have as man vices in the visibility department. But it was abandoned in favour of the biplane because of speed. James Linn |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"sddso" wrote in message ... Closeup examination of the Dr.1 at Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome indicates that its main airfoils had far less wire bracing than any Sopwith design (can't recall if Rhinebeck has a Camel or not at the moment). Were the differences in parasitic drag enough to cause difference in max attainable speed? Memory suggests that Rhinebeck's airframes are as faithful to original as can be found anywhere. As discussed in the program, the wires did make the Sopwith more vulnerable to enemy fire. But the limiting factor in the design was the drag of three wings. Sopwith had realised this and not gone into big production with their triplane. Saw yesterday the same show regarding battle of Britain, and the same visibility situations existed to an extent. The ME 109 had a blind spot above the pilots head(fixed on later versions), where as the Spitfire had excellent visibility. The show basically had the contest as dead even - they preferred fuel injection to the Spits carbs, and the ME-109's cannons(did an experiment with aircraft aluminum at 200 yards, showing the big difference), but penalised the 109 on visibility and range. James Linn |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote:
"Alberto Panno-Peano" wrote in message . com... I think Biplanes and Triplanes were the best planes ever made. I think the Red Baron could beat any plane of today with his triplane ! I even think that Zeppelins are better than most modern planes ! Score on Trollmeter 1/10 - Very Poor Effort Keith C'mon Keith!...he's just starting out, cut him some slack here!... -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|