If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
BDS writes:
Well, then that conflicts with what another poster said which I believe was that MSFS allowed you to yaw the nose without any heading change. Yes, it does. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Newps writes:
You still haven't listed one time when the rudder does not change flight path. A forward slip. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
"Barney Rubble" wrote in
: How do you know that they aren't just agreeing with you in the hope that you will go away? Seems much more plausible based on your current performance. Only way the troll will go away is for us not to answer him..... Allen |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Newps writes:
There is never a case where it doesn't change flight path. Landing in a crosswind. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Mark Hansen writes:
It is changing the flight path the aircraft would have taken had you not applied the rudder. It is also maintaining the flight path that you originally intended. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Nomen Nescio writes:
Won't work that way. The wing leveler won't keep the wings level in that situation. You are telling me things that are manifestly untrue when I actually try them, which wastes my time. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Alexey Goldin writes:
If this statement about MSFS behavior is true, it is impossible to simulate soaring flight in MSFS. I have no experience with MSFS --- is this the case? Never mind simulated flying under cumulonimbus or in virga --- exactly the case where you do not want to do it for real... MSFS includes a glider. I have no glider experience so I cannot comment on its realism. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Sam Spade writes:
In the context of aviation the purpose of simulation is to faithfully duplicate the aircraft flight deck, panels and systems, motion, and outside visual references so that pilot qualification in the simulator translates into pilot qualification in the aircraft. No. Simulation reproduces specific aspects of the real world with specific levels of accuracy and realism. No simulation reproduces everything perfectly. Some simulators reproduce certain things perfectly. There is no one size that fits all, nor is it necessary for all simulators to reproduce everything. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
Paul kgyy writes:
If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. I didn't know it was possible to do that. I haven't flown in a long time. I'm surprised nobody has forbidden it as "useful to terrorists." -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
Not often. For the most, visual approaches are used over ILS approaches. When cleared for the visual approach, you won't be using autoland, as you won't be on an ILS approach, regardless of if you join the localizer and track it. You're still on the visual approach. That just isn't so. Jet aircraft are required to remain on, or above, the ILS G/S whether on an ILS approach or on a visual approach. At the company I worked for, failure to tune and identify the ILS for a visual approach to an ILS runway was a check-ride bust. As to autoland, most of them are down in good weather for proficiency and to maintain certification of the airborne equipment. Autolands can (and are) even be practiced on visual approaches provided the ILS is intercepted prior to the PFAF. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|