If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Turbine to RC transition
I'm not really having a problem with it, I just posted originally because I
saw an easy cheap way to make the lil buggers easier to fly. The other reason I mentioned my circuit is because there was that fella in here with helicopter controls rigged to the remote control device. Now that I have a little experience with the RC thing I can honestly say that his device would be of little practical value in learning to fly a real one because of the reversed control issue. The reason I say that is that unless you totally disconnect the yaw gyro of the RC and keep the helicopter's tail pointed at the pilot the experience would share very little in common with a real helicopter, and might even give you some pretty bad habits that would have to be unlearned. If you used a circuit like I describe, and disconnect the yaw gyro it would be a lot more like flying a real one. The only thing I dont think can really be fixed about the heli-seat-controller is the fact that the mass of an RC ship is so much less and the controls are so much more quick and forgiving in the RC. It's much harder to get behind the power-plant and rotor system in the little RC, if you behaved similarly in a big chopper you'd overtorque it or get a mast bump. You might be able to remedy this by putting some fancy software between the controller and the RC machine though. One thing about it that just can't be replicated no matter how hard you tried is that a good portion of hovering flight is done through your proprioceptive system (aka your ass). I can feel tiny lil G's in my body that I use unconciously use to correct drift, yaw, and height. The reason I know this is that I have a damn hard time hovering IGE in Bell's flight training device when I go for recurrency. The only thing unrealistic about their simulator is that its not full motion, and you have to fly totally with your eyes. Because its not a full motion sim, the things its best suited at training are systems failures and IFR/IMC stuff. They don't ever try to teach any flight technique in theirs. Bart "Steve R" wrote in message news:EBGag.33475 I had the same problem when I was at your stage. Straight nose-in wasn't an issue. That 135 degree point was a total PITA. About the best explanation I can give is that the model is oriented right at that point where your brain is trying to decide whether to control it's in normal or nose-in mode. I remember when I first learned nose-in, I figured that I could start doing smooth pirouettes now because that was I skill I always wanted to master. Only to find out that, while I could comfortably fly tail or nose-in, transitioning between the two, smoothly, was another matter. Hang in there, it will come! :-) Fly Safe, Steve R. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MINI 500, Rinke, Turbine, Helicopter for sale, Helicopter, Revolution, Turbine Power | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 28th 09 07:50 PM |
Rick Stitt, Joe Rinke, Rinke Aerospace, BJ Schram, Mini 500, Turbine, Helicopter, Kit | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 24th 04 01:15 AM |
Mini 500, Helicycle, Turbine, Joe Rinke, Rinke Aerospace, Rick Stitt, Conversion, Kit | TurbineMini Richard | Rotorcraft | 0 | January 15th 04 11:48 PM |
TRUTH OF THE MINI-500 TURBINE CONVERSION | Dennis Chitwood | Rotorcraft | 10 | January 7th 04 05:33 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |