If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug" wrote in message
This isn't meant to be a scientific experiment or to become information used instead of any government research or guidelines. OK? I think you are missing the point Happy Dog... Frying eyeballs at 3500ft with a 5mw device is not the question. That's the claim. I suspect the terrorists want to verify their ability to point a higher powered, possibly useful weapon. Like a cheap hunting rifle? You "suspect"? Any evidence that "the terrorists want to verify their ability to point a higher powered, possibly useful weapon"? "The terrorists"? Are you stupid? Clinically paranoid? Pick one. GA has been bent over and ****ed for the last four years for absolutely no defensible reason. The laser incidents are a perfect example. You got some evidence to the contrary? Produce or shut up. Homeland insecurity doesn't give **** one about us beyond Boyer. (You a member?) In the meantime: The whole thing is crap. It's homeopathic psoriasis-curing crap. Multi-level marketing crap. Girls waiting for your call crap. Flying yourself is cheaper than driving crap. Flying yourself is cheaper than flying commercial crap. PPL for 3000.00 crap. ATP and a career for 10,000.00 crap. Flight schools that actually make money that promoting the previous crap crap. You can get insurance to fly your GIII anywhere for less than first class tickets for you and your family every week crap. Parachutes that statistically change the GA accident rate crap. Parachutes that won't save you better than a Vso, Vg, *whatever* crash at night crap. Twin eninges will save your life crap. Twin engines will, engine failure over cold water, (holy christ, *that's* a sobering thought) due to the statistical improbablility of having to swim not make it worth it to own one if you can afford it crap. Pilot error crap. Investigator error crap. Ground crew fueling ****up crap. Fuel transfer mismanagement crap. Ten, or twenty, tank drains will save you crap. Somebody *elses* fault crap. I would have put it down on the fairway crap. I have no opinion about that crap. Gear up landing because ATC rushed me crap. Night flying (over 100 hrs) isn't IFR flying crap. Alternative to regular exercise "xxx" to get your mill to TBO crap. Graphic in-cockpit display of IFR approaches will save your life crap. Navigating NYC Terminal Air Space with just a map crap. Flying is safer than driving your car crap. Planes, boats and hookers (guys OR girls) are a good investment crap. ARRRGHHHH. NOW you've done it! From sci.physics, Uncle raileth: It is the worst kind of pandering magnetic hernia truss multi- level marketing to make you rich beyond your wildest dreams by tomorrow without so much as a lick of personal inconvenience crap. It is Lotto crap, Publisher's Clearinghouse crap, Home Shopping Network crap, infomercial crap, Bre-X crap, hollow Earth crap, flat Earth crap, Heaven's Gate crap, Chariots of the Gods crap, quartz crystal crap, teleevangelical crap, thinner thighs in 30 days crap, other-ablement crap, Virgin Mary on a taco crap, Elvis on a taco crap, War on Drugs crap, War on Poverty crap, night basketball crap, eat oat bran crap, breast enlargement cream crap, buy the Brooklyn Bridge at only a tiny fraction of its true value crap, 1000-year old ginseng crap, 5000 yogic floaters to cleanse the world crap, free energy crap, anti- gravity crap, hot young girls waiting for your call crap, psychics hot line crap, never change your engine oil again crap, interpret your dreams crap, sure-fire horse betting crap, Superman squeezing a lump of coal into a blue white and perfect fully faceted 290 carat diamond crap... .... Peace Dividend crap, Bosnian/Somali/Northern Ireland/Iraqi pacification crap, peace in our time crap, Pacem in Terris crap, Limits to Growth crap, Whip Inflation Now crap, I am not a crook crap, nukular engineer crap, I didn't inhale crap, Health Care Crisis crap, Department of Energy crap, marijuana will kill you crap, chastity crap, tobacco isn't addictive crap, burning tobacco isn't carcinogenic crap, children kidnapped over the Internet and sold into hebephile pornography crap... ....MBA crap, human factors engineering crap, social engineering crap, Project Head Start crap, thousand points of light crap, compassion crap, nurturance crap, sensitivity counseling crap, Special Olympics crap, learning disablement crap, Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity/diversity crap, multiculturalism crap, multilingualism crap, Kwanzaa crap, Days of Rage crap, Nobel Prize in Literature crap, automotive airbags crap, commuter lane crap, the E*L*E*C*T*R*I*C car crap, recycled post-consumer waste crap, low volume flush toilet crap, fuel from biomass crap... ....Workers' Paradise crap, Democratic Republic of [you name it] crap, New Soviet Man crap, Save the Earth crap, Furbish lousewort crap, clothe animals to hide their genitalia crap, N-rays crap, Krebiozen crap, amygdalin crap, smart drugs crap, coffee enemas to cure cancer crap, cosmic consciousness crap, orgone energy crap, aura crap, astral plane crap, astrology crap, ouija board crap... Crap, crap, crap. LOVE Usenet! moo |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What a load of crap.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Mr. H. Dog,
There is some debate wheter or not these lasers do any harm. Another rumour is that fast spinning objects are invulnerable to high power lasers. Well, combine those two. You are going to use a low power one so the spinning does have to be very fast. I think the roll rate of a plane will be enough. So, roll your plane as fast as possible on final approach and see what happens(Do not forget to level wings just before touch down) Present your findings to the FAA. Maybe they make it a rule that everybody has to roll their planes on final because it is much safer in case of a terrorist attack with laser pointers. -Kees |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Happy Dog wrote:
... Are you stupid? Clinically paranoid? Pick one. GA has been bent over and ****ed for the last four years for absolutely no defensible reason. ...six thousand word pointless rant removed... Dear M. Happy Dog, Re your rather sharp concerns about paranoia: As soon as practicable, take a look at www.buying-medication.com/Prosac.htm. Also, you should equip yourself with a tin foil hat which should increase your sculls albedo in addition to protecting you from FAA/CIA scanning. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:11:33 -0500, "Happy Dog"
wrote in :: The whole thing is crap. You're obviously THE crap expert, and a credit to the public image of airmen everywhere. :-) But then, I wouldn't expect anything less from an anonymous usenet poster. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:53:03 +0000, 10Squared
wrote in :: Laser device in question has a rated power of 5 mW. Actually, some are available with over 10 times that power: http://www.wickedlasers.com/products.php However, as you assert, they are probably still incapable of inflicting retinal damage at the distances involved when aimed at an aircraft in flight. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in 1. Acquire a standard optometrist eye chart. [A television resolution chart would be a good substitute] 2. Before each exposure, determine visual acuity. 3. After each exposure, repeat acuity test 4. Start at a lower exposure duration and work up. [This may require performing the test(s) on separate nights] 5. Do the whole thing during the day, facing away from the sun. 6. Chart your work Hmmm, before step 1, check your medical insurance and have an optometrist or opthomalogist do a retinal scan, before and after. Apart from the retinal scan, pointless. The claim is that tiny lasers can blind pilots. It's bull****. There isn't even a valid theory behind it. My work is just entertainment. Truth be told, I agree that the hysteria regarding the lasers, as you succinctly put it in a later post, is a load of it. My suggestions in the list were to give your test some data points that, while not scientific, would show trends, if any. What you end up with may be publishable. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:53:03 +0000, 10Squared wrote in :: Laser device in question has a rated power of 5 mW. Actually, some are available with over 10 times that power: http://www.wickedlasers.com/products.php However, as you assert, they are probably still incapable of inflicting retinal damage at the distances involved when aimed at an aircraft in flight. OK, let's see what happens with their most wicked laser. I see the Extreme Phoenix with a power rating of 500mW. The quoted beam divergence is 1.2 mrad. Assuming a distance of 1 km, a = 1.2 mrad tan a = x / 1 * 10^3 x = 10^3 * m * x tan a tan a =~ a x = 1.2 * 10^3 * 10^-3 * m = 1.2 meters To be conservative, let's use the beam divergence of only .5 mrad, or .5 meters at 1 km: ..5 m = 50 cm p = 500 mW / (3.141 * 25 * 25 * cm^2) Your 500 mW laser has a power of about .25 mW/cm^2 at 1 km. Again, much less than the MPE for constant exposure. That brings up another point: Who is going to stare at a laser? Brief exposure is uncomfortable and will cause you to look away quickly, so MPE equation #2 is probably the one that applies. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
moo wrote in message oups.com... Dear Mr. H. Dog, There is some debate wheter or not these lasers do any harm. Another rumour is that fast spinning objects are invulnerable to high power lasers. Well, combine those two. You are going to use a low power one so the spinning does have to be very fast. I think the roll rate of a plane will be enough. So, roll your plane as fast as possible on final approach and see what happens(Do not forget to level wings just before touch down) Present your findings to the FAA. Maybe they make it a rule that everybody has to roll their planes on final because it is much safer in case of a terrorist attack with laser pointers. -Kees |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Dighera"
wrote in :: The whole thing is crap. You're obviously THE crap expert, and a credit to the public image of airmen everywhere. :-) But then, I wouldn't expect anything less from an anonymous usenet poster. Hardly anonymous. I post from my ISP. HD is a registered name. It's even on my Visa. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Piloting | 19 | September 10th 04 04:53 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |