If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian Colwell" wrote in message news:IJ8vc.640777$oR5.204800@pd7tw3no... Of course the UK had ground based rocket AA defense systems. Not sure how effective they were ! but to see and hear them was pretty impressive :-)) Which was their major value as I recall. They were pretty much phased out in 1941 which is a pretty good indicator. The Wire-Barrage Rocket Projectile was also fitted to naval vessels in the early part of the war. Most were removed when it was realised that not only were they ineffective but the poor stability of the projectiles and warheads made them a hazard to the ships on which they were mounted. Keith ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"John Mullen" wrote in message ...
"Taki Kogoma" wrote in message ... On 1 Jun 2004 15:21:56 +0100, (ANDREW ROBERT BREEN) allegedly declared to rec.aviation.military... In article , Prowlus wrote: Does anyone know why the allies didn't consider using their air lauched rockets as air-to-air weapons during the war when the jets started appearing? I thought it would have been a good idea to ward off any attack from ME-262s or me-163s which were too fast to attack with guns. The VVS was using air-air rockets against the Japanese over Manchuria in 1938 or so. They made quite extensive use of them in the early part of the war against Germany (before giving them up as ineffective, iSTR). Compared with the allies (well, the Russians) the germans were very slow in trying air-to-air rockets. And the nature of the intended targets (relatively large and slow bomber formations rather than small, fast, and nimble fighters, jabos, etc.) made the german AA rocket a viable option at that point in the war. The Luftwaffe did of course use AA rockets against US and UK bombers in thelatter stages of the war. The Me-262 was certainly equipped to fire them. John They, the 55mm R4M were excedingly effective. 1 in 24 hit and destroyed its target and as an Me 262 carried 24 of them they had a success rate of almost 100% when using this weapon. The Me 262 had a EZ 42 computing gyro gun sight, and some I believe received the FuG 244 ranging radar that could via the "Elfe" computer inject the firing solution into the gun sight for the cannon and I believe unguided R4M 55mm misiles as well though I'm not sure if the FuG 244/Elfe combo was ever used in combat. Clearly a stream of such missiles if competently aimed would be effective against large bombers. I suspect post war versions of such missiles could have been fitted with proximity fuses. They Germans also had a larger missile under developement that had a shaped charge that scattered a forward focused fragmentation charge that was activated by a timer fuse set be Elfe. The timer activated 21cm Wgr 21 rockets that was launched in pairs from FW190s and Me109s were very effective untill escorts began harrasing the heavily laden aircraft. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
They, the 55mm R4M were excedingly effective. 1 in 24 hit and destroyed its target and as an Me 262 carried 24 of them they had a success rate of almost 100% when using this weapon. Not quite. There was no onboard ranging system so manually computing 800 yards was a tough thing to do with closure speeds anywhere from 300-500 MPH. I have interviewed several JG 7 pilots and two JV 44 guys - although they were MIGHTY happy with the R4M, it was no magic bullet. Remember that very very few Me 262s even had the rails for rockets. The Me 262 had a EZ 42 computing gyro gun sight, About 20% of them did, and that includes some of the KG 51 bomber variants. Most Me 262 pilots never saw an EZ 42; some that did insisted the gyro be locked as it was too radical a departure from their earlier method of gunnery. and some I believe received the FuG 244 ranging radar that could via the "Elfe" computer inject the firing solution into the gun sight for the cannon and I believe unguided R4M 55mm misiles as well though I'm not sure if the FuG 244/Elfe combo was ever used in combat. It was not. Clearly a stream of such missiles if competently aimed would be effective against large bombers. I suspect post war versions of such missiles could have been fitted with proximity fuses. The R4M was intended as a cheap shotgun and was about as simple as a rocket could be. Fitting it with prox fuses would have greatly improved it. They Germans also had a larger missile under developement that had a shaped charge that scattered a forward focused fragmentation charge that was activated by a timer fuse set be Elfe. The X-4 can be properly seen as the grandfather of modern Air to Air missiles. As usual, the LW waited too long... The timer activated 21cm Wgr 21 rockets that was launched in pairs from FW190s and Me109s were very effective untill escorts began harrasing the heavily laden aircraft. That was almost immediately after they were placed into service. LW pilots *detested* the Wgr 21s as overweight, parabolic albatrosses hanging from their necks. One Gruppenkommandeur was ordered to evaluate these rockets in combat - he refused to order anyone else in his unit to use them after it was clear that the added weight would make the shooting platform a sitting duck. Major Klaus Haberlen then flew the mission himself, and nearly died in the failed attempt to bring down a bomber with them. Filing his report with OKdLW, the GruppeKdr failed to realize that the Wgr 21 was *supposed* to work; Goering found out that Haberlen "dissed" the weapon system and had him sacked on the spot, then ordered his replacement to carry on with the near-suicidal missions. Popular, the Wgr 21 was not. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR An LZ is a place you want to land, not stay. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Keith Willshaw keithnospam@kwillshaw
..demon.co.uk writes "Brian Colwell" wrote in message news:IJ8vc.640777$oR5.204800@pd7tw3no... Of course the UK had ground based rocket AA defense systems. Not sure how effective they were ! but to see and hear them was pretty impressive :-)) Which was their major value as I recall. They were pretty much phased out in 1941 which is a pretty good indicator. The Wire-Barrage Rocket Projectile was also fitted to naval vessels in the early part of the war. Most were removed when it was realised that not only were they ineffective but the poor stability of the projectiles and warheads made them a hazard to the ships on which they were mounted. Keith To quote the late, great, Roger Bacon... 'The first generation of air-to-air missiles could not hit anything, apart from, occasionally, the launching aircraft. The second generation of air-to-air missiles could hit the target, but only with the targets extreme co-operation. The third generation of air-to-air missiles - whoosh, zap, aarrgh!' Cheers, Dave -- Dave Eadsforth |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Most Me 262 pilots never saw an EZ 42; some that did insisted the gyro be
locked as it was too radical a departure from their earlier method of gunnery. A lack of training opportunity? I recall an interview with Galland. He said that what made the Mustang effective was its Gyro sight. They had more attack options than the Luftwaffe pilots and he regarded this as decisive. Presumably the experten were ambush predators and this allowed for more effective ambushes. Oddly, it seemed the other way - nachwuchs adapted to the EZ rather quickly - it was the old hands that seemed to feel the gyro was unnecessary and at times even confusing. I thought it was funny the way they introduced the EZ 42 into Me 262 service: one day, the jet bomber pilots of KG 51 at Neuberg heard an old familiar sound - over the trees comes a tiny Bü 181. After it lands, the pilots are assembled and given a class on the new gunsite (ooohs and aaahs all around), then the instructor, a non-Luftwaffe pilot, took them out one by one in the Bücker, with this incongruous gunsite set in the dash. After a couple days teaching the pilots, the first EZ 42s were mounted in their Me 262 Jabos, leaving a lot of these former Ju 88 bomber pilots scratching their heads! It was very common within the Gruppe to 'play' with it for a while, then lock it down to act as a normal Revi gunsite. Old habits die hard, I guess! They Germans also had a larger missile under developement that had a shaped charge that scattered a forward focused fragmentation charge that was activated by a timer fuse set be Elfe. The X-4 can be properly seen as the grandfather of modern Air to Air missiles. As usual, the LW waited too long... I refer to another missile the R100 BS. I about fell off my chair when I saw one of these for sale on Ebay three years ago. Same guy sold a Föhn, and later and R4M. The Föhn sold for $22 - I just slapped my head over missing that one. The R4M and R100 went for astronomical prices; I assumed they came out of some museum somewhere. Developed by Rheinmetall Borsig. It was a 100mm x 67 inch (thats the mkixed data I have) that was to be fired by the oberon radar ranging system. It had a timed proximity fuse with 460 pellets that were blasted in a forward cone. They weighed 125kg and were fired from AG 140 racks. Intended for the Ar 234 with the Ez 42 gun sight and perhaps other aircraft. That Oberon was a mess - it completely filled the nose (i.e., no guns!) of the Me 262 it was fitted to - not much good in that, but then it was only a prototype. The Germans should have been able to develop such a modest sized missile with a radar proximity fuse. Prolly so, but prox fuses were never given the priority they should have had - it would have made the difference in the night war against the teiffliegers. It was not so oversized and the acceleration was not so excessive as to present insupperable shock hardening problems. It seems easier than all those complicated guidence systems for attacking a lumbering bomber flying formation. I think the optical cell-fired rockets were a good idea too. Fly under a bomber and your fighter takes its own shot, leaving you to concentrate on those little black dots diving from above. The timer activated 21cm Wgr 21 rockets that was launched in pairs from FW190s and Me109s were very effective untill escorts began harrasing the heavily laden aircraft. That was almost immediately after they were placed into service. And it was P38s Lightning not P51 Mustangs that saved the bombers from heavily armed rocket had heavy caliber armed German fighters that were unopposed. Even Stukas were having a go at the B17s. Must have been interesting to watch those pitiful old creatures trying to reach 20K! Popular, the Wgr 21 was not. Intersting story; the Wgr 21 however was unusual in having been developed by the troops themselves. Clearly to heavy. In the right hands - say, a Knoke or Glunz-type pilot, the Wgr 21 was an effective and terrifying tool, but most LW pilots felt the tubes and rockets were "going to get us killed!" v/r Gordon |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The third generation of air-to-air missiles - whoosh, zap, aarrgh!' Well said. PK edged much closer to 1.0 G |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Krztalizer" == Krztalizer writes:
The Germans should have been able to develop such a modest sized missile with a radar proximity fuse. Krztalizer Prolly so, but prox fuses were never given the Krztalizer priority they should have had - it would have made the Krztalizer difference in the night war against the teiffliegers. You mean 'Tiefflieger'? I.e. low level strafers.... at night? Could you elaborate? Obviously I missed some reading here, but are you referring to Mosquito raids or what, maybe intruders? Thanks, -- G Hassenpflug * IJN & JMSDF equipment/history fan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Krztalizer difference in the night war against the teiffliegers.
You mean 'Tiefflieger'? Yep - I manage to mangle the spelling every time, and its in many of the documents I have to translate. I.e. low level strafers.... at night? Usually used that way, but also used to describe British Main Force raiders. Could you elaborate? Obviously I missed some reading here, but are you referring to Mosquito raids or what, maybe intruders? I think prox fuses could well have done the job to counter the Mosquito - if it worked against V-1s, I can't see them having a problem with Mossies sent to Berlin on routes so routinely used that they were known to air defense forces as railway "tracks". By the same token, Sterlings lumbering along in the dark at 14,000' wouldn't be much of a challenge to an AA battery with proximity fuses. Considering the prewar Oslo letter contained an advanced proximity fuse, it appears the wartime German leadership never made it the priority it should have been. v/r Gordon |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Company Launched - Sells Rare & Unusual Airplane Parts and Accessories | Plane Pieces Inc | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 14th 04 02:14 AM |
New Company Launched - Sells Rare & Unusual Airplane Parts and Accessories | Plane Pieces Inc | Home Built | 0 | September 14th 04 02:13 AM |
F-89 rockets fail to stop Hellcat | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 02:46 PM |
Rockets used in al-Rashid hotel match "aluminum tubes" rockets | Robb McLeod | Military Aviation | 7 | October 28th 03 07:49 AM |
Student Built RV6A Officially Launched | Aubrey Adams | Home Built | 10 | October 22nd 03 01:05 AM |