If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 6, 9:56*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Award or not, the controller didn't save that pilot. B/S! You are wrong as usual, the controller DID, DID may I repeat DID save that pilot's life! Would he have gotten down safely without the controller? Probably not! You are talking out of your backside! You know nothing about the real world of flight, you don't fly, you probably never will, and nothing that proceeds from your trap should be taken with any amount of sincerity whatsoever. Ricky |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:22:01 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Of course Mx makes a judgment without being there. Why do you possibly care? What shortcoming in your life, what void, does he fill? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 13, 4:11*pm, "Jay \"Little Napoleon\" Severson"
wrote: On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:22:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: Of course Mx makes a judgment without being there. Why do you possibly care? What shortcoming in your life, what void, does he fill? The answer to your question is fortunately none :-) His judgment is clearly a credibility issue especially when he claims the ATC controller was breaking rules. He still hasn't showed me the reference when I asked him to point the page in the reference he provided to Jim that idle chat is prohibited on the frequency. Gee I wonder why..... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 15, 2:53*pm, "Jay \"Little Napoleon\" Severson"
wrote: Because he's a troll who gets off on ruining newsgroups and sucking in ppl like you to accomplish his means?- Hide quoted text - Can't argue that.... Unfortunately I did take the bait hook line and sinker. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 16, 8:57*am, " wrote:
On Mar 15, 2:53*pm, "Jay \"Little Napoleon\" Severson" wrote: Because he's a troll who gets off on ruining newsgroups and sucking in ppl like you to accomplish his means?- Hide quoted text - Can't argue that.... Unfortunately I did take the bait hook line and sinker. But then if you just let idiots post half arsed claims about aviation some-one out there will think that (because there is no reply) that the idiot has a point. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 15, 3:07*pm, george wrote:
But then if you just let idiots post half arsed claims about aviation some-one out there will think that (because there is no reply) that the idiot has a point. This is true too! :-) I guess the hard thing is to finding that right balance without feeding the Mx troll. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
"george" wrote But then if you just let idiots post half arsed claims about aviation some-one out there will think that (because there is no reply) that the idiot has a point. ***************** My reply on how to handle that problem is a boilerplate statement that does not acknowledge the poster as being worth a direct argument. Reply with something like: The poster, Mxsmaniac that wrote the above is not a pilot, and has been proven to be a troll that is only posting here to stir up trouble and destroy this newsgroup. He frequently posts information that is partially or totally false, so his posts should not be believed. Others would be best advised to not engage with this poster, which only prolongs his disruptive presence. -- Jim in NC |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
On Mar 15, 7:07*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
Reply with something like: The poster, Mxsmaniac that wrote the above is not a pilot, and has been proven to be a troll that is only posting here to stir up trouble and destroy this newsgroup. * Ya know, Jim, I agree somewhat, but I wonder if Mx's intent is really to "destroy this newsgroup?" I could be wrong. He seems to have legitimate things to say & ask sometimes, or most of the time, but he is possibly one with a mental deficiency of sorts, which may lead to his annoying comments here. I don't get the impression that he's trying to purposefully be disruptive, but he is anyway. I do agree, however, that a blanket statement such as your's is wisdom, especially for one who may be inclined to take what he says with any amount of sincerity. Ricky |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On air conversation about JFK controller - Video
george wrote:
But then if you just let idiots post half arsed claims about aviation some-one out there will think that (because there is no reply) that the idiot has a point. No, you completely ignore them, and they will eventually go away for lack of attention. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flying brothers [10 of 26] "1909 Signal Corps Flyer. Orville Wright is gesturing while in conversation with Lt. Frank Lahm.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | no name | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 22nd 09 06:37 AM |
Amazing Conversation on your Site | PolZegerully | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | December 16th 06 04:45 PM |
FYI per our conversation. | Phineas Pinkham | Military Aviation | 0 | September 8th 03 09:53 PM |