If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
Sounds like the guy hasn't done much research.
But if the intent is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. True, in fact they did a really ****ty job. They overspeed the planes several times and had to circle around a couple times before they could even find the very large targets. In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted "hard" struments. They probably used a very simple straight forward method to address the EFIS. They probably covered it up with duck tape. They weren't trying to execute ILS approaches to mins here, they just flew (very poorly I might add) the planes into giant targets. Some have speculated they may have had Garmin 295's on them, making navigation about as difficult as eating PopTarts. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
09-11-2001 was a clear cool, calm day, a real "corker". The two
pinheads who crashed AAA 11 test drove the same flight the previous Tuesday, again in First Class. The only other passenger in First was actor James Woods who later commented on their weirdness. Who knew. Flying an EFIS Jet, it's a snap! My 13 year old can fly my F-15 ( she has Flight sim) the A-320 (of course) and the 744 (EFIS) and she is from St. Petersburg, Russia! Jeez we used to fly Bos-Dca direct, steer 245 degrees no brainer. Bush On 21 Feb 2006 11:50:19 -0800, " wrote: Robert M. Gary wrote: Sounds like the guy hasn't done much research. But if the intent is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. True, in fact they did a really ****ty job. They overspeed the planes several times and had to circle around a couple times before they could even find the very large targets. And the FDR suggested it was anything but a smooth approach. In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted "hard" struments. They probably used a very simple straight forward method to address the EFIS. They probably covered it up with duck tape. They weren't trying to execute ILS approaches to mins here, they just flew (very poorly I might add) the planes into giant targets. Some have speculated they may have had Garmin 295's on them, making navigation about as difficult as eating PopTarts. Yeah, I understand this guys point of view, but he makes alot of comments about IFR. This was not an IFR day. All they had to do was to modify the coordinates in the autopilot and let it get them close. Then merely guide it to impact in the approach. It was a clear day and you could see a long darn way. And those building stood out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
eScrew zen story | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 20th 04 07:19 AM |
Funny story about naval | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 20th 04 03:37 AM |
Funny story about piloting | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | December 20th 04 12:34 AM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |