![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, typical government approach of throwing the baby out with the bath
water. The problem wasn't spin training per se, it was instructors not proficient in how to conduct spin training. So, rather than address that root problem, the Feds simply removed the requirement and discouraged the practice entirely. Ok, looking back on most peoples responses here, this seems to be the concensus - rather then ensure that those who are training the spins to begin with are sufficiently trained themselves, and flying aircraft suitable for spin training, the requirement was just removed in the USA. IMHO, a bad move, and a band-aid solution. Like I mentioned, I can say one thing for sure - the spin training I took as a student here in Canada made me know what to expect, and how to handle it. I "read" about spins in the POH and my traning manuals for the week before I actually flew the lesson. Yep, I had everthing I should have "needed" to know in my head. However, I quickly learned after my first actual spin that the real thing is different then reading about it. There was no doubt the training helped, as after a few spins (within 10 to 20 minutes), I was able to recover rapdily after the incipient stage, often loosing only minimal alittude. In a base turning final situation, after accomplishing the spin training, I'm sure the possibility of recovering is much greater for me, vs. someone who only ever read about it, but never did a spin in practice. The fact that there was such a large number of spin training related accidents in the USA makes me wonder if perhaps alot of instructors are just not quite up to their task? My comments are in no way meant to be personal or insulting to any instructors here, but is this a possibilty? Is this a problem with instructor ratings perhaps being easier, or a little "too" easy to obtain in the USA, versus other countries? With spins being mandatory here, the instructors handle it like any other lesson, and there doesn't seem to be any worry about it being a "dangerous" lesson in any regard. Pretty much every week in the peak seasons, there is some student doing spins in the training area. At least here, it's dealt with as just another checkmark in the training logbook.. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have (or when I was flying) had a exercise entering fully developed
stalls where you were in a takeoff configuration. partial power, full flap and high nose position to maintain altitude. This execise is sufficient for sport pilots to recognise the onset of a spin. But learning to fly DH82's spin training and air restarts were mandatory :-)) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been
the most popular way to screw up? i understand the drill and i'm having trouble picturing how to mess up that badly in the typical training cessana starting at maybe 2500' agl. now that i've got my tailwheel endorsment, spin training is next (after i gather a few more aluminum cans from beside the highway for the fliyin fund!). dan |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() houstondan wrote: general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been the most popular way to screw up? i understand the drill and i'm having trouble picturing how to mess up that badly in the typical training cessana starting at maybe 2500' agl. Using Aileron instead of rudder to pick the wing up after the wingdrop will make the rest of your day quite boring :-) now that i've got my tailwheel endorsment, spin training is next (after i gather a few more aluminum cans from beside the highway for the fliyin fund!). Why is it that the good things cost the most ? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmm....
I will wait for this answer as well Dan.. We were taught to start all spins at 5000 ft +...never below.. I spin our 172 regularly just to stay sharp at recovery, and besides that, it's great fun! I wonder what I would have to screw up to make the "smoking hole" from 5 K, in such a gentle manouver as a spin.... Oh, and if anybody here has NOT done one.. - you don't get "tossed around" inside the aircraft. - It is gentle on the aircraft... - Is a non issue with modern gyros -The g's on recovery seldom exceed 1.5 G's... - The attitude is VERY unusual,- the windscreen is totally full of "ground" , and it's rotating, and it REALLY gets your attention! I believe it is a good idea to do enough of them to eliminate the "surprise" factor, and have the "automatic reflexes" of recovery kick into gear early. There is about 2 - 3 seconds of "oh ****" in your 1st spin that could kill you close to the ground.... IMHO one should "train out" those first 2-3 seconds and give your self and passengers a far better chance of survival.. YMMV! Dave On 2 Apr 2005 16:55:54 -0800, "houstondan" wrote: general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been the most popular way to screw up? i understand the drill and i'm having trouble picturing how to mess up that badly in the typical training cessana starting at maybe 2500' agl. now that i've got my tailwheel endorsment, spin training is next (after i gather a few more aluminum cans from beside the highway for the fliyin fund!). dan |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
houstondan wrote:
general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been the most popular way to screw up? i understand the drill and i'm having trouble picturing how to mess up that badly in the typical training cessana starting at maybe 2500' agl. now that i've got my tailwheel endorsment, spin training is next (after i gather a few more aluminum cans from beside the highway for the fliyin fund!). dan One way that was relayed to me by a crusty old instructor is to have the student freeze at the controls making it hard for the instructor to recover from the spin. Matt |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been
the most popular way to screw up? i understand the drill and i'm having trouble picturing how to mess up that badly in the typical training cessana starting at maybe 2500' agl. As someone else mentioned, using aileron instead of rudder. Admittedly, I almost did it on my first ever spin while training....it's instinctive, and it's a *hard* habit to break, especially when you are at such an unusual attitude after the wing drops and the nose suddenly is pointed towards the ground. :-) I caught myself in mid-movement of the yoke, and corrected ailerons back to neutral for the rest of the recovery, but the instinct to correct with aileron before the plane is actually flying again, and not stalled, is overwhelming. On the first one or two spins, there is definately an "oh crap" factor that causes your hands to override what your head is telling you is the "right thing" to do. My instructor suggested that I "Wedge" my elbow somewhere on the door to prevent me from physically using aileron untill I got past the actual spin, and have recovered from it. That worked for me, although after the 3rd spin (I think we did 5 or 6 in the lesson plan) I had it pretty much down, and really didn't need to do that any longer. As for 2500 AGL you quoted, that's wayyyyy low.. Our training area is about 650' asl, and we were climbing through to 4500' before each spin... It was a comfortable height, and even after recovery from 2 or 3 turns in the spin, I never felt uncomfortably low. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
houstondan wrote:
general to the group: in spin training, what seems to have been been the most popular way to screw up? The best way to make it terminal seems to be to get the loading wrong in such a way that you can't recover from the spin. According to a fellow I spoke to at the Maule factory, it is nearly impossible to recover in an MX-7 with the CG at one extreme of the envelope (he did not remember which extreme but thought it might be aft). Maule placards the aircraft "Intentional spins prohibited." Between 5 and 10 years ago, two CFIs died in a PA-28 near Solberg when the spin went flat. The last time this thread surfaced, several people said that loading is also critical in some models of C-172. George Patterson Whosoever bloweth not his own horn, the same shall remain unblown. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spin our 172 regularly just to stay sharp at recovery, and besides
that, it's great fun! Curious why are you doing spins in a 172? Your own plane? Besides it not being allowed unless you are in the Utility W&B envelope, from everything I've read and understand the 172 is not a great plane for spin training regardless. The flightschool I'm at won't allow spin training in their 172's regardless of W&B within utility... 152's are mandatory when that portion of the curriculum arrives. - you don't get "tossed around" inside the aircraft. True, although I wouldn't leave my kneeboard or a pen loose in the cockpit during spins, regardless. - It is gentle on the aircraft... Well, I could debate that one.. - Is a non issue with modern gyros From everything I've read, true. -The g's on recovery seldom exceed 1.5 G's... Again, from student to student that could change.. With a good recovery and plenty of alt, that sounds about right.. I'd be surprised if I pulled more then 1.5 on the recovery...however, my CFI has apparently had some "not so pretty" recoveries that resulted in not so pretty recoveries, which probably exceeded 1.5g by a sizable margin. - The attitude is VERY unusual,- the windscreen is totally full of "ground" , and it's rotating, and it REALLY gets your attention! I believe it is a good idea to do enough of them to eliminate the "surprise" factor, and have the "automatic reflexes" of recovery kick into gear early. Yep! My exact resoning behind the fact that I feel spin training should still be mandatory. There is about 2 - 3 seconds of "oh ****" in your 1st spin that could kill you close to the ground.... Yep! :-) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message ...
I wonder what I would have to screw up to make the "smoking hole" from 5 K, in such a gentle manouver as a spin.... Switch aircraft and try it in an AA1... That'll get your attention, I suspect... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |