If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
It's certainly a matter of perception and everyone thinks about
it differently. My feeling is it's a combination of both. I start with slight pitch changes and adjust the throttle accordingly. If you're timing your ILS approaches you'd want to maintain a constant speed. "Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... Hmm, I was taught to use the throttle to stay on glideslope, not the elevator. I find using the throttle results in more controllability. Roy Smith wrote: I s'pose. But you really shouldn't be playing with the throttle constantly either. Somewhere along the line I picked up adding "DFWTP" to my ILS checklist. DFWTP at GS intercept, GUMPS at DH. It stands for "Don't F*** With The Power". -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
I used to do it with elevator, till an instructor on one of the refresher
courses I took showed me how much better power worked for my airplane (a cherokee six). I can keep the needle centered much better with small changes in power than I can with the elevator. SO what I mean by controllability, is the ability to keep the needle pegged. Peter Duniho wrote:-- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Using the throttle will keep the speed constant. Using pitch will change the
airspeed, albiet only slightly for the small pitch changes associated with flying an approach. Likewise, I use only throttle on a non-precision approach because it keeps the airspeed constant (plus I know how much MP reduction is required for a specific descent rate) Roger Tracy wrote: It's certainly a matter of perception and everyone thinks about it differently. My feeling is it's a combination of both. I start with slight pitch changes and adjust the throttle accordingly. If you're timing your ILS approaches you'd want to maintain a constant speed. "Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... Hmm, I was taught to use the throttle to stay on glideslope, not the elevator. I find using the throttle results in more controllability. Roy Smith wrote: I s'pose. But you really shouldn't be playing with the throttle constantly either. Somewhere along the line I picked up adding "DFWTP" to my ILS checklist. DFWTP at GS intercept, GUMPS at DH. It stands for "Don't F*** With The Power". -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... Hmm, I was taught to use the throttle to stay on glideslope, not the elevator. I find using the throttle results in more controllability. A little late to the thread, aren't you? That was over a month ago. Anyway... Your comment points to a classic debate, of course. Likely that no person on one side will be convinced to change their methods. However, suffice to say there are plenty of us that find that elevator is a more responsive and useful way to adjust glideslope during an instrument approach. You're above L/Dmax (so pitch changes do "what you expect"), and the result of a pitch change is somewhat more uniform from airplane to airplane (power changes can produce radically different results from airplane to airplane, depending on drag, weight, and type of powerplant). Yes, but you typically also want to maintain a given airspeed while on the approach. Using small throttle adjustments allows you to track the glide path while maintaining a uniform airspeed. Using the elevator won't do that. I always trim to the desired approach speed and then make small throttle adjustments to track the GS ... of course, if you have dramatic wind shear, then you may need large throttle and elevator inputs. Either throttle or pitch can be used for the same purpose, with approximately the same effect. All that said, IMHO if you're going to say something like "I find using the throttle results in more controllability", you ought to define what "controllability" means. Making glideslope changes with pitch instead certainly doesn't cause the airplane to go out of control, so it's not really clear what difference you're talking about. It does allow you to keep better control of the airspeed. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LSA Approach speeds | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | February 3rd 04 05:38 PM |
How much protection on approach? | Michael | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 05:58 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |