A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An odd thing about CAD...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 25th 05, 12:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An odd thing about CAD...

(aside from blank messages :-)

I use DeltaCAD, a simple 2D replacement for the traditional T-square
and triangles, to make patterns for parts, from a 56" rib to itty-bitty
things for home-made clocks, tiny steam engines and similar stuff. And
I talk about it, too. If you hope to share information at a distance
you need good drawings and a simple CAD program is miles ahead of
old-fashioned drafting.

That produces a lot of mail, almost all of it from guys telling me why
they DON'T use CAD, or at least, not DeltaCAD. Such as the message I
received last night in which the feller explained that the reason he
didn't like DeltaCAD -- and only had it so he could print out my
drawings of VW conversion parts -- was because he was accustomed to
working in fractional inches.

"In the time it takes me to convert 27/64ths to decimal and get it
typed in," he wrote, "I could have drawn it a dozen times with a
drafting scale."

I had to think about that for a while. A private answer would have
been more polite but if one person thinks DeltaCAD can't handle
fractional inputs then others might, too. And the truth is, it handles
them just fine. Want a line 27/32nds in length? Then select the LINE
function, indicate the point of oirgin with your pointer and type in
27/32.

One and nine-sixteenths? Then type in 1 (space) 9/16. Two feet, three
and three-sixteens would be entered as 2'3 3/16.

I can appreciate the feelings some guys have when they're faced with
converting a 1920's drawing into a digital format. Back then,
everything was in fractions of an inch and American Wire Gauge, neither
of which is in common usage today. But DeltaCAD, with which I have no
relationship other than as a satisfied customer, really IS handier than
your T-square, triangles and drafting scale. The odd thing is that so
few guys my age think so and I really can't understand why. The
complete manual is only 218 pages long and most of that is white-space.
In fact, compared to other CAD software DeltaCAD is so simple most
guys start turning out usable drawings without ever reading the manual.

-R.S.Hoover

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance Owning 0 November 22nd 05 02:13 PM
A Sure Thing [email protected] Soaring 5 January 8th 05 12:16 AM
The Most Beautiful Thing Ever Grantland Military Aviation 37 October 28th 03 05:10 AM
Is a static port a precision thing? Larry Smith Home Built 8 August 12th 03 10:26 PM
SUV thing Fastglasair Home Built 4 July 12th 03 05:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.