If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
On 2008-04-02, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
"Brought into Florida" is awfully broad. It's really not. Virtually every state that has a Sales tax has a Use tax. It is so that if you live or have an ongoing connection with a state you can't get around paying the sales tax buy purchasing an item in another state. Oh, I understand full well the intent of the tax. Minnesota has one, and I'll be paying it on the Zodiac. (6.5% of the full purchase price, ouch!) Now I will admit that the way the Florida law and tax regulation is written in regards to aircraft is **** poor. It's the letter of the law that counts. But the spirit behind the law is not to charge for Use of their airspace. Actually, the Minnesota use tax *does* intend to charge for use of the airports and airspace: it's due if an aircraft uses either for more than 60 days out of the first year. Fortunately, they do only charge it for Minnesota owners. (The provision is for cases where a Minnesota owner bases the aircraft in another state; I could do that, for example, living as close to Iowa as I do.) There is no true example of say a pilot from Arkansas purchasing a plane in FL or Arkansas and then that pilot taking a vacation to FL and getting taxed. There's gotta be fire under the smoke; EAA wouldn't be publishing this one right before Sun n Fun if there weren't some basis for it. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (ordered 17 March, delivery 2 June) |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
Jay Maynard wrote:
On 2008-04-02, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: "Brought into Florida" is awfully broad. It's really not. Virtually every state that has a Sales tax has a Use tax. It is so that if you live or have an ongoing connection with a state you can't get around paying the sales tax buy purchasing an item in another state. Oh, I understand full well the intent of the tax. Minnesota has one, and I'll be paying it on the Zodiac. (6.5% of the full purchase price, ouch!) Now I will admit that the way the Florida law and tax regulation is written in regards to aircraft is **** poor. It's the letter of the law that counts. But not only Florida's law counts. There are Federal Constitutional issues here that negate a state from taxing a citizen from another state in the only way this is going to effect you or I. But the spirit behind the law is not to charge for Use of their airspace. Actually, the Minnesota use tax *does* intend to charge for use of the airports and airspace: it's due if an aircraft uses either for more than 60 days out of the first year. Fortunately, they do only charge it for Minnesota owners. (The provision is for cases where a Minnesota owner bases the aircraft in another state; I could do that, for example, living as close to Iowa as I do.) There is no true example of say a pilot from Arkansas purchasing a plane in FL or Arkansas and then that pilot taking a vacation to FL and getting taxed. There's gotta be fire under the smoke; EAA wouldn't be publishing this one right before Sun n Fun if there weren't some basis for it. CYA all around. Never bad idea. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
"Tim Ward" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... WJRFlyBoy wrote in : On 1 Apr 2008 14:53:01 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What your not getting is that there is reality and perception, zooms trying to create the perception that if you go to SnF you'll get taxed when the reality is a lot different I have shown several times and in several posts that Florida has the legal, statutory right to tax your plane under the conditions outlined in this thread. That they have taken exactly that action. I simply do not understand why it is that you can't get this concept through your head. Look, would you guys, all of you, please go do a short course on argumnt? Bertie You want room 3A, just along the hall. It's being hit on the head lessons in here. I should have expected that. ( Good set up for your next Python gag!) Bertie |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... WJRFlyBoy wrote in : On 1 Apr 2008 14:53:01 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What your not getting is that there is reality and perception, zooms trying to create the perception that if you go to SnF you'll get taxed when the reality is a lot different I have shown several times and in several posts that Florida has the legal, statutory right to tax your plane under the conditions outlined in this thread. That they have taken exactly that action. I simply do not understand why it is that you can't get this concept through your head. Look, would you guys, all of you, please go do a short course on argumnt? Bertie You want room 3A, just along the hall. It's being hit on the head lessons in here. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:01:59 -0400, Kyle Boatright wrote:
"WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... On 1 Apr 2008 14:53:01 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: What your not getting is that there is reality and perception, zooms trying to create the perception that if you go to SnF you'll get taxed when the reality is a lot different I have shown several times and in several posts that Florida has the legal, statutory right to tax your plane under the conditions outlined in this thread. That they have taken exactly that action. I simply do not understand why it is that you can't get this concept through your head. There is a very limited set of circumstances in which Florida will tax an aircraft. The ANN articles implied that the circumstances are far broader than they are in reality. Typical of the annual "Torpedo SnF " hatchet job articles, the story in ANN didn't have a byline, didn't offer enough facts to paint the entire picture, and was timed to cause harm to SnF. Other than that, it was a fine article. KB No disagreement with any of this, Kyle. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:20:48 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Oh, I understand full well the intent of the tax. Minnesota has one, and I'll be paying it on the Zodiac. (6.5% of the full purchase price, ouch!) Now I will admit that the way the Florida law and tax regulation is written in regards to aircraft is **** poor. It's the letter of the law that counts. But not only Florida's law counts. There are Federal Constitutional issues here that negate a state from taxing a citizen from another state in the only way this is going to effect you or I. So you get the privilege of paying the use tax *and* expending the $$$ suing the State Of Florida for violating constitutional law? This is good? |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Florida Residency Not Florida Landing Creates Use Taxability (was: Cirrus Owner Tell His Story)
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:17:16 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
There is no true example of say a pilot from Arkansas purchasing a plane in FL or Arkansas and then that pilot taking a vacation to FL and getting taxed. According to FDOR, they have and will continue to do just that. FYI, you don't have to bring the aircraft to FL either. http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/taxes/s...ft_dealer.html Under most conditions, use tax is due on aircraft brought into Florida within 6 months from the date of purchase. *However, use tax may be immediately due if any of the following conditions are met:* * The aircraft is owned by a Florida resident. * The aircraft is owned by a corporation and used by a corporate officer or director who is a Florida resident. * The aircraft is owned by a corporate entity that has an individual vested with authority to participate in the management, direction, or control of the entity's affairs who is a resident of or makes his or her permanent residence in this state. * The aircraft is owned by a person, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint adventure, association, syndicate, business trust, trust, estate, or other form of artificial entity that is not engaged in Florida in any employment, trade, business, or profession in which the aircraft will be used. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:20:48 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Oh, I understand full well the intent of the tax. Minnesota has one, and I'll be paying it on the Zodiac. (6.5% of the full purchase price, ouch!) Now I will admit that the way the Florida law and tax regulation is written in regards to aircraft is **** poor. It's the letter of the law that counts. But not only Florida's law counts. There are Federal Constitutional issues here that negate a state from taxing a citizen from another state in the only way this is going to effect you or I. So you get the privilege of paying the use tax *and* expending the $$$ suing the State Of Florida for violating constitutional law? This is good? No the point is that Florida's lawyers are well aware of the Constitutional issues and aren't violating and aren't charging you as a non-Floridian for flying to SNF. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Cirrus Owner Tell His Story
Jay Maynard wrote:
Actually, the Minnesota use tax *does* intend to charge for use of the airports and airspace: it's due if an aircraft uses either for more than 60 days out of the first year. Speaking only of use of the airspace over a state (e.g. overflight but no landing), there is a federal law I believe prohibits a state from charging any taxes or fees for such a transit: " (b) Prohibitions.--Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section and section 40117 of this title, a State, a political subdivision of a State, and any person that has purchased or leased an airport under section 47134 of this title may not levy or collect a tax, fee, head charge, or other charge on-- (1) an individual traveling in air commerce; (2) the transportation of an individual traveling in air commerce; (3) the sale of air transportation; or (4) the gross receipts from that air commerce or transportation. (c) Aircraft Taking Off or Landing in State.--A State or political subdivision of a State may levy or collect a tax on or related to a flight of a commercial aircraft or an activity or service on the aircraft only if the aircraft takes off or lands in the State or political subdivision as part of the flight." Additional context may be found here (in case I have misinterpreted the law): http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...:+49USC4011 6 |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Florida Residency Not Florida Landing Creates Use Taxability
WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:17:16 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: There is no true example of say a pilot from Arkansas purchasing a plane in FL or Arkansas and then that pilot taking a vacation to FL and getting taxed. According to FDOR, they have and will continue to do just that. FYI, you don't have to bring the aircraft to FL either. http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/taxes/s...ft_dealer.html Under most conditions, use tax is due on aircraft brought into Florida within 6 months from the date of purchase. *However, use tax may be immediately due if any of the following conditions are met:* * The aircraft is owned by a Florida resident. * The aircraft is owned by a corporation and used by a corporate officer or director who is a Florida resident. * The aircraft is owned by a corporate entity that has an individual vested with authority to participate in the management, direction, or control of the entity's affairs who is a resident of or makes his or her permanent residence in this state. * The aircraft is owned by a person, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint adventure, association, syndicate, business trust, trust, estate, or other form of artificial entity that is not engaged in Florida in any employment, trade, business, or profession in which the aircraft will be used. I think here is the problem. The you are looking at is a page designed for Florida aircraft brokers and dealers and is written in such a way as to assume that that is who is reading it. Take for example this paragraph... "Aircraft dealers and brokers must register with DOR to collect and remit sales tax prior to beginning business in this state. Most aircraft sellers must also register to collect and remit solid waste fees on sales of new tires and sales of new lead-acid batteries. You can register online; go to the Department's Internet site at www.myflorida.com/dor and click on e-Services. If you do not have Internet access, you can complete a paper Application to Collect and/or Report Tax in Florida (Form DR-1)." If you take that word for word it would make it look like an Arkansas broker or dealer would be in violation of Florida law if he doesn't register there even if the dealer had no business in FL. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just Bought A Plane? STAY OUT OF FLORIDA ! | WJRFlyBoy | Piloting | 156 | April 15th 08 12:52 PM |
Just Bought A Plane? STAY OUT OF FLORIDA ! | WJRFlyBoy | Owning | 157 | April 15th 08 12:52 PM |
Bought my first plane:-D | EridanMan | Owning | 8 | May 16th 06 08:22 PM |
bought the plane today | houstondan | Owning | 30 | April 30th 06 06:34 AM |
I just bought my 1st Plane...Thanks to the newsgroup! | WinstonCup | Owning | 24 | February 10th 04 11:46 PM |