If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
"Cessna Seventy-three Charlie Quebec is departing runway 25 at Grass Valley
on a 2300 mile final for runway 9 Oshkosh." {;-) Jim "Allen" wrote in message ... Which does nothing to define what "final approach" is. If you are aligned with the runway and intending to land does final begin 5 miles from the threshold? 10 miles? 15 miles? 50 miles? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
On May 10, 1:46 pm, John Godwin wrote:
wrote roups.com: Landing. Aircraft while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force and aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed... ... and I believe that the AIM defines "Final Approach" as: A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline from the base leg to the runway. -- "FINAL APPROACH -- ICAO. That part of an instrument approach procedure which commences at the specified final approach fix or point, or where such fix or point is not specified: a. At the end of the last procedure turn, base turn or inbound turn or a racetrack procedure, if specified b. At the point of interception of the last track specified in the approach procedure; and ends at a point in the vicinity of an aerodrome from which: 1. A landing can be made; or 2. A missed approach procedure is initiated. FINAL APPROACH -- IFR. The flight path of an aircraft which is inbound to an airport on a final instrument approach course, beginning at the final approach fix or point and extending to the airport or the point where a circle-to-land maneuver or missed approach is executed." From that definition, "final approach" would be from the marker inbound on an ILS, or wherever the arriving traffic happens to get lined up with the final approach course. I'm sure you're aware that traffic arriving IFR is often vectored onto 5-10 mile final, so that "base leg" may have been flown, just 10 miles from where you're used to turning base-final. Faster, high performance aircraft often take time to slow down and transition from the terminal phase to approach and landing. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 1:46 pm, John Godwin wrote: wrote roups.com: Landing. Aircraft while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force and aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed... ... and I believe that the AIM defines "Final Approach" as: A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline from the base leg to the runway. -- "FINAL APPROACH -- ICAO. That part of an instrument approach procedure which commences at the specified final approach fix or point, or where such fix or point is not specified: a. At the end of the last procedure turn, base turn or inbound turn or a racetrack procedure, if specified b. At the point of interception of the last track specified in the approach procedure; and ends at a point in the vicinity of an aerodrome from which: 1. A landing can be made; or 2. A missed approach procedure is initiated. FINAL APPROACH -- IFR. The flight path of an aircraft which is inbound to an airport on a final instrument approach course, beginning at the final approach fix or point and extending to the airport or the point where a circle-to-land maneuver or missed approach is executed." From that definition, "final approach" would be from the marker inbound on an ILS, or wherever the arriving traffic happens to get lined up with the final approach course. I'm sure you're aware that traffic arriving IFR is often vectored onto 5-10 mile final, so that "base leg" may have been flown, just 10 miles from where you're used to turning base-final. Faster, high performance aircraft often take time to slow down and transition from the terminal phase to approach and landing. So you are saying that 10 miles is where final approach begins? The AIM says you should complete your turn to final at least 1/4 mile from the runway; it does not specify a maximum distance. It also defines "final" as the term commonly used to mean that an aircraft is on the final approach course or is aligned with a landing area. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
("Steven P. McNicoll" swrote)
If you're able to run from a shark you're on land and there's no need to run at all. Let alone searching for a shark's ass, to kick. Mont-black-in-the-water-everyone |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
"Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Steven P. McNicoll" swrote) If you're able to run from a shark you're on land and there's no need to run at all. Let alone searching for a shark's ass, to kick. They must have one. Otherwise they'd just eat all day and night and keep getting bigger and bigger wouldn't they? :-)) Dudley Henriques |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
On May 10, 3:20 pm, "Allen" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 1:46 pm, John Godwin wrote: wrote roups.com: Landing. Aircraft while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force and aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed... ... and I believe that the AIM defines "Final Approach" as: A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline from the base leg to the runway. -- "FINAL APPROACH -- ICAO. That part of an instrument approach procedure which commences at the specified final approach fix or point, or where such fix or point is not specified: a. At the end of the last procedure turn, base turn or inbound turn or a racetrack procedure, if specified b. At the point of interception of the last track specified in the approach procedure; and ends at a point in the vicinity of an aerodrome from which: 1. A landing can be made; or 2. A missed approach procedure is initiated. FINAL APPROACH -- IFR. The flight path of an aircraft which is inbound to an airport on a final instrument approach course, beginning at the final approach fix or point and extending to the airport or the point where a circle-to-land maneuver or missed approach is executed." From that definition, "final approach" would be from the marker inbound on an ILS, or wherever the arriving traffic happens to get lined up with the final approach course. I'm sure you're aware that traffic arriving IFR is often vectored onto 5-10 mile final, so that "base leg" may have been flown, just 10 miles from where you're used to turning base-final. Faster, high performance aircraft often take time to slow down and transition from the terminal phase to approach and landing. So you are saying that 10 miles is where final approach begins? The AIM says you should complete your turn to final at least 1/4 mile from the runway; it does not specify a maximum distance. It also defines "final" as the term commonly used to mean that an aircraft is on the final approach course or is aligned with a landing area. I'm saying the official definition of "final approach" is vague with regards to distance from the end of the runway. Realisticly, I would argue that "final approach" would begin at the point you can see the runway. Outside of that, I'd call distance and intention; ie- "Twin Cessna 3AB, 15 to the west, straight in runway 9.... Twin Cessna 3AB, 10 mile final, runway 9" etc. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
"Montblack" wrote: Let alone searching for a shark's ass, to kick. They must have one. Otherwise they'd just eat all day and night and keep getting bigger and bigger wouldn't they? :-)) Really, no ****? ;-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . "Dudley Henriques" wrote: "Montblack" wrote: Let alone searching for a shark's ass, to kick. They must have one. Otherwise they'd just eat all day and night and keep getting bigger and bigger wouldn't they? :-)) Really, no ****? ;-) OUCH!!! What's REALLY troublesome to me about this is that I have to reason to myself how 50 odd (and odd is indeed appropriate here :-) years in professional aviation has finally come down for me to this thread. :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Dudley Henriques |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
PSA: Don't be rude on the radio
wrote in message ups.com... On May 10, 3:20 pm, "Allen" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 1:46 pm, John Godwin wrote: wrote roups.com: Landing. Aircraft while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force and aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed... ... and I believe that the AIM defines "Final Approach" as: A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline from the base leg to the runway. -- "FINAL APPROACH -- ICAO. That part of an instrument approach procedure which commences at the specified final approach fix or point, or where such fix or point is not specified: a. At the end of the last procedure turn, base turn or inbound turn or a racetrack procedure, if specified b. At the point of interception of the last track specified in the approach procedure; and ends at a point in the vicinity of an aerodrome from which: 1. A landing can be made; or 2. A missed approach procedure is initiated. FINAL APPROACH -- IFR. The flight path of an aircraft which is inbound to an airport on a final instrument approach course, beginning at the final approach fix or point and extending to the airport or the point where a circle-to-land maneuver or missed approach is executed." From that definition, "final approach" would be from the marker inbound on an ILS, or wherever the arriving traffic happens to get lined up with the final approach course. I'm sure you're aware that traffic arriving IFR is often vectored onto 5-10 mile final, so that "base leg" may have been flown, just 10 miles from where you're used to turning base-final. Faster, high performance aircraft often take time to slow down and transition from the terminal phase to approach and landing. So you are saying that 10 miles is where final approach begins? The AIM says you should complete your turn to final at least 1/4 mile from the runway; it does not specify a maximum distance. It also defines "final" as the term commonly used to mean that an aircraft is on the final approach course or is aligned with a landing area. I'm saying the official definition of "final approach" is vague with regards to distance from the end of the runway. Realisticly, I would argue that "final approach" would begin at the point you can see the runway. Outside of that, I'd call distance and intention; ie- "Twin Cessna 3AB, 15 to the west, straight in runway 9.... Twin Cessna 3AB, 10 mile final, runway 9" etc. No, I am with you on this! I just think there should be some (even if it is arbitrary number pulled from a hat) distance to define when you are on "final". What if you are approaching an airport from the wrong side and make a right-hand turn to align with a runway with a left-hand traffic pattern. There should be some distance from the airport you could do this and then make a "straight-in" approach without violating any regs or the AIM. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Don't be rude on the radio
"buttman" wrote in message oups.com... On May 10, 10:20 am, "Peter Dohm" wrote: Lemme get this straight! You are in instructor, which means you are instrument rated, which means that you should know that outer markers are typically at least five miles from the landing zone--so, if you can not recall for a specific airport, you can still guess five miles. In addition, you did not bother to maintain familiarity with the procedures at an airport where you typically instruct, you failed to understant that the Cirrus had travelled a substantial (probably between a third and a half) of the distance to the runway, and then you turned in front of known traffic which you did not see. First off, I never said I did nothing wrong. I know I made a mistake by turning in front of him. We all make mistakes, whether you're an instructor or not. THE WHOLE POINT of the post was that the Cirrus guy had to act like a pumpus ass. Sounds like a typical childish response (ie, making excuses). The only pompous ass here is yourself. -- Matt Barrow Performace Homes, LLC. Colorado Springs, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Radio | Clint | Soaring | 0 | January 17th 06 11:01 AM |
Talk About A Rude Company, | NW_PILOT | Owning | 48 | December 25th 04 10:51 PM |
Talk About A Rude Company, | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 44 | December 24th 04 03:30 AM |
Have you been to an airport where the people in the tower are consitently rude? | LowApproach_SoCal | Piloting | 15 | August 23rd 04 04:19 AM |
FA OLD AIRCRAFT RADIO TRANSMITTER STANDARD RADIO | Ron | Restoration | 0 | October 26th 03 12:02 AM |