A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Raise your useful load without an STC...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 07, 08:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?

Hilton



  #2  
Old August 2nd 07, 10:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tom L.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:34:53 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:

1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?

Hilton


It's valid, or at least more accurate that the traditional 6 lbs/gal.

Fuel specific density probably varies between manufacturers, but is
usually specified as 0.7 or 0.71, which is about 5.84 lbs/gal.

You need to carry a lot of fuel for this difference to amount to
anything useful.
I'll keep using the more conservative "6", ... and start dieting

- Tom
  #3  
Old August 2nd 07, 11:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

Hilton wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?


Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so.

Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is
what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago
to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take
time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if
more impractical for their pilots.


Matt
  #4  
Old August 2nd 07, 01:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Theune
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 159
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

Matt Whiting wrote:
Hilton wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual
6 lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?


Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so.

Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is
what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago
to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take
time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if
more impractical for their pilots.


Matt

For 50 gallons of fuel the difference is 9 pounds. Not much of a
difference as most peoples weight can change 4 pounds in a day based on
time of day and water in/out
  #5  
Old August 2nd 07, 01:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

Matt,

According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C".
Not sure how 'correct' this is.

Hilton


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
news
Hilton wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?


Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so.

Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is what
it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago to
simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take time
to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if more
impractical for their pilots.


Matt



  #6  
Old August 2nd 07, 05:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

On Aug 2, 8:54 am, "Hilton" wrote:
Matt,

According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C".
Not sure how 'correct' this is.


One of the material data sheets at Shell's website says their 100LL is
0.718 kg/L at 15 C.
http://www.shell.com/static/au-en/do..._100ll_pds.pdf

0.72 kg/L is 6.02 lb/US gallon.

I guess it depends on how "exact" you want your calcs to be. I mean,
come on, do you actually weigh yourself before you do each and every
w&b calc?

  #7  
Old August 2nd 07, 10:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Cubdriver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 253
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:23:23 GMT, Tom L.
wrote:

You need to carry a lot of fuel for this difference to amount to
anything useful.


In the Cub, it would allow me to gain 2 pounds, or not to lose 2
pounds, as the case might be.

Every little bit helps!

Blue skies! -- Dan Ford

Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942
from HarperCollins on August 21 www.flyingtigersbook.com
  #8  
Old August 2nd 07, 11:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

John Theune wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote:
Hilton wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the
usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?


Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so.

Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is
what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago
to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't
take time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct,
if more impractical for their pilots.


Matt

For 50 gallons of fuel the difference is 9 pounds. Not much of a
difference as most peoples weight can change 4 pounds in a day based on
time of day and water in/out


I didn't say it made much of a difference, just that it is valid.

Matt
  #9  
Old August 2nd 07, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

Hilton wrote:
Matt,

According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C".
Not sure how 'correct' this is.


I've seen several different values, but most are less than 6.00 lbs/gal.

According to this site, the specific gravity of ConocoPhillips 100LL is 0.7.

http://www.conocophillips.co.uk/NR/r...D7/0/msds6.pdf



According to this site, the density of water at 15.5C is 8.33727 lbs/gal.

http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/se...r-density.html



Multiplying that by 0.7 yields: 5.836 lb/gal for the 100LL.

I can't vouch for the calculator site, but I trust the ConocoPhillips
MSDS much more than anything on Wikipedia, which is about the least
reliable source on the internet in my experience.

Matt
  #10  
Old August 3rd 07, 12:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 517
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:08:46 -0400, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT
net wrote:


Every little bit helps!


That's why most FBOs have public bathrooms.

"All passengers must "evacuate" before boarding." G
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server over-load Jim Macklin Instrument Flight Rules 6 August 17th 06 01:48 AM
New 182T, where's the useful load?? Robert M. Gary Piloting 10 April 27th 06 06:48 PM
Bush went to war to raise oil prices. Garamondextended Military Aviation 6 May 29th 04 02:24 AM
Load supervisers jfp Piloting 0 April 13th 04 04:25 PM
Load supervisers jfp General Aviation 0 April 13th 04 04:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.