If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
Hi all
This has been thrashed out before but a search didnt come up with any difinitive answers, only general observations and personal views. What opinions have you all on canopy tinting - what color and why? The tinted canopy looks better from the outside - Yep, I reckon so The tints seem to lower the temperature inside -really? -HOW? I would have thought the darker color retains more heat than a clear canopy does- am I wrong? Is there a significant difference in heat reduction from the tint, once the cockpit has cooled after launch? The lower light within the cockpit makes reading some instruments difficult, especially with age modified eyeballs - I can imagine this to be true, is it a big problem, does it outweigh any benefits? Does the color chosen improve visibility outside- for seeing haze domes, distanct CU or other aircraft? And therefore, should the color be chosen specifically for where one intends to fly? For example, the terrain over Australia is generally an entirely different color to that of rural UK or snowy area's in the European Alps or northern US, should the color be matched to these areas? Aside from reflections being reduced in the darker cockpit, an obvios benefit -especially for DG type canopies, is it mainly a glam thing that only makes the craft look better from outside? Thanks, Bagger |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
bagmaker wrote:
Does the color chosen improve visibility outside- for seeing haze domes, distanct CU or other aircraft? With a tinted canopy you are "locked in" to that particular tint. I prefer to apply my own tint where it counts the most, using sunglasses (and no tint on the canopy). When flying heat buildup shouldn't be an issue with proper cockpit venting. On the ground use a canopy cover. My .02 Regards, -Doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
On Jul 30, 11:46 pm, bagmaker
wrote: Hi all The tints seem to lower the temperature inside -really? -HOW? I would have thought the darker color retains more heat than a clear canopy does- am I wrong? Is there a significant difference in heat reduction from the tint, once the cockpit has cooled after launch? The reason canopy tints tend to be blue/green is to reduce IR (not UV) transmission into the cockpit and it is noticeable when you go from a tinted canopy to a clear one (as I have done at present) that direct sun on the face feels hotter. The tint won't significantly reduce heat buildup from the greenhouse effect from the light wavelengths that get through. Does the color chosen improve visibility outside- for seeing haze domes, distanct CU or other aircraft? And therefore, should the color be chosen specifically for where one intends to fly? For example, the terrain over Australia is generally an entirely different color to that of rural UK or snowy area's in the European Alps or northern US, should the color be matched to these areas? The tint colour is not usually amber/yellow (that would be expected to be better for haze penetration and UV protection) because the intention is to filter IR rather than blue/UV. UV is already mostly blocked by a good quality clear canopy. There is a body of opinion that a blue or green canopy will reduce haze penetration (which it should do in theory) but a few years ago I reported on RAS trials that my syndicate partner and I made in a blue tinted canopy Duo comparing looking through the canopy versus the clear view panel while wearing a variety of coloured sunglasses. We could find no subjective reduction in haze penetration. John Galloway Thanks, Bagger -- bagmaker |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
Couple of points.
Light scatters more at the higher wavelengths, ie blue. This is why the orange colored "blue blockers" improve visibility. They block the scattered light from haze, dust, etc. If you want this effect, you'd need your canopy tinted the same reddish color of the "blue blocker" sunglasses. If the canopy is tinted, the canopy itself should absorb more light. Because some of the light is blocked and not able to pass through to the cockpit interior there should be a reduction in temperature in the cockpit. I suspect that this would not yield a significant difference in cockpit temperature. One potential downside is that if more light is absorbed by the canopy, you could potentially experience issues with the canopy not wanting to close nicely on a hot day due to the additional thermal expansion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
. *When flying heat buildup shouldn't be an
issue with proper cockpit venting. *On the ground use a canopy cover. My .02 Regards, -Doug Never flown a glider in Arizona, I bet! Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
bagmaker wrote:
Hi all Aside from reflections being reduced in the darker cockpit, an obvio benefit -especially for DG type canopies, is it mainly a glam thin that only makes the craft look better from outside? -- bagmaker I've flown clear and kinda brown tinted. It was cooler in the tinted one. I wear sunglasses so I'm not sure I remember how the tints affected visibility. it was just cooler inside -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...aring/200807/1 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
There were a few assumptions made in the original post that were
probably wrong and most of them have been corrected in later postings. I've been involved in lighting and perception for 25 years (see brianhoodlightingdesign.com for more about that) and can offer some more opinions. From the original post: "I would have thought the darker color retains more heat than a clear canopy" was responded to with- 'The reason canopy tints tend to be blue/green is to reduce IR (not UV) transmission into the cockpit and it is noticeable when you go from a tinted canopy to a clear one (as I have done at present) that direct sun on the face feels hotter. The tint won't significantly reduce heat buildup from the greenhouse effect from the light wavelengths that get through.' This is mostly correct in my view. First, UV filters made of plastic tend to be clear while glass UV filters are slightly yellow, but this has more to do with other factors. UV is by definition not a visible spectrum so there is no reason for tint to affect UV transmission. On the other hand, sunlight that is absorbed by a dark canopy (down- converted to heat in the plastic) would then be cooled by cool air (if present) passing over the canopy so there could be some benefit there, plus radiant heat (clear canopy) is much more efficient at heating you than convective (tinted canopy). In my opinion, tinted is better in this respect. From the original post: "The lower light within the cockpit makes reading some instruments difficult, especially with age modified eyeballs - I can imagine this to be true, is it a big problem, does it outweigh any benefits?" I have to disagree with this. I can't think of any case where the light levels in the cockpit would fall so low as to prevent easy viewing of the ASI or altimeter. If you use a PDA it will be much more visible under a tinted canopy because the contrast ratio (contrast ratio is a much more important factor than total luminance) is so much less. The ability of the eye to respond to the very different amounts of light as it is directed first at a diffuse sky dome and then back to a dim PDA is the difficult visual task here. In my opinion, tinted is better in this respect. Finally, From the original post: " no definitive answers, only general observations and personal views" there will be no definitive answers, because in the end very little is known about light and how it works on a basic level. That light is photons that go 186,000mps is a nice theory that is popular but is contradicted by a lot of other known facts. More to the point, the old theories of how the eye and brain detect and respond to light via rods and cones has been quite upset by the research into non-visual photoreceptors or 'Intrinsically photoreceptive retinal ganglion cells'. If that is of any interest google 'melanopsin' and go from there. It's all quite fascinating really, and some of it relates directly to this question. Brian On Jul 30, 3:46 pm, bagmaker wrote: Hi all This has been thrashed out before but a search didnt come up with any difinitive answers, only general observations and personal views. What opinions have you all on canopy tinting - what color and why? The tinted canopy looks better from the outside - Yep, I reckon so |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
Hi Guys.
I manufacture transparencies I really believe in changing sunglasses to match conditions. First, I hate the idea that you can't lighten a canopy on a murky day. Second, I feel that tinted canopies are a hit and miss quality issue. Think for a minute about how the canopies are made. A flat piece of material is stretched either by free blowing or in contact with a tool surface. This produces areas of flow that make the canopy thinner in some places than others. The non-uniform thickness means some places are darker than others as tint values are depth dependant. If you are getting roasted in Arizona, stick a piece of dark green cling film tinting to the inside of the canopy above your head. You dont spend a lot of time looking straight up so the abrupt change from light to dark will not matter, and the temps will still drop dramatically.. Scott Correa Spektr Products. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
Having flown with a variety of tinted/non-tinted canopies, I would say that
on an average soaring day they seem to make very little difference to vision and/or heating. In very low light levels (twilight/dark) I'd prefer to be under a clear lid but practically it wouldn't make a huge difference. IMHO you're probably better off with a clear canopy + cover + a decent pair of sunglasses: at least you can change/remove the sunglasses... The "Perspex" normally used for glider canopies is transparent from about 350nm and longer wavelengths, which includes part of the UVA band. There is enough energy in the photons there to cause skin/tissue damage, so although you might not visibly "burn" as much as in direct sunlight, it's not at all good for you. I'm a bit sensitive in this respect so for me high-factor sunblock is a must in a glider. You can get "UV 400" Perspex which only lets in visible light but I've never heard of a canopy being made with it (maybe I should ask!) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
canopy tint
On Aug 1, 5:55 am, Ed Downham wrote:
Having flown with a variety of tinted/non-tinted canopies, I would say that on an average soaring day they seem to make very little difference to vision and/or heating. In very low light levels (twilight/dark) I'd prefer to be under a clear lid but practically it wouldn't make a huge difference. IMHO you're probably better off with a clear canopy + cover + a decent pair of sunglasses: at least you can change/remove the sunglasses... The "Perspex" normally used for glider canopies is transparent from about 350nm and longer wavelengths, which includes part of the UVA band. There is enough energy in the photons there to cause skin/tissue damage, so although you might not visibly "burn" as much as in direct sunlight, it's not at all good for you. I'm a bit sensitive in this respect so for me high-factor sunblock is a must in a glider. You can get "UV 400" Perspex which only lets in visible light but I've never heard of a canopy being made with it (maybe I should ask!) Well, you didn't really ask, but here is is anyhow... http://www.thermotecusa.com/ Ray Poquette has been making 98% UV blocker canopies of ALL flavors for along time. Here is a link to his UV canopy chart: http://www.thermotecusa.com/ThermoTe...opy%20Info.htm -Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need 1-26E Canopy USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | March 5th 08 12:23 AM |
Canopy | Yosimite Sam | Home Built | 4 | November 21st 04 12:35 AM |
K8 Canopy | Jack Wyman | Soaring | 0 | June 9th 04 08:36 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
SGS 2-32 canopy? | Gary Boggs | Soaring | 0 | January 6th 04 11:21 PM |