A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What happened on this ILS approach?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 26th 05, 06:16 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Doug wrote:

Not being descended soon enough is one of the biggest complaints the
airline captains have on Approach. ATC seems to think we have a
helicopter out there.


Some of the pilots at the carrier I used to work for had a standard speech
for center or TRACON controllers when they rode the jump seat on "fam"
trips: The captain would place his hand on the speed brake handle and say,
"This is to correct my mistakes, not your's."

Cute, but I don't think it did much good.

With a light piston, it seems to me the old rule about not dropping below
15 inches of manifold pressure (except on short final) was a pretty sound
rule, IMC or VMC.

  #22  
Old July 26th 05, 08:06 PM
max
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sounds like you couldn't do much more to make it happen. My first
thought would have been, as soon as the localizer needle started coming
in, begin as fast a decent as possible to 2300 to see if I could get
there before the FAF. I guess that's basically what you did...

Peter R. wrote:

As ATC turned me to intercept the localizer I noticed that I was already
above the glideslope. Upon aligning with the localizer and still a mile or
two prior to the OM, the glideslope needle fell to to the bottom of the
scale. I began about a 750 fpm descent at about 100 kts to see if there
was any movement in the glideslope needle, but to no avail; it remained
pegged.


  #23  
Old July 26th 05, 09:06 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Best one to use I've heard is "If I don't get lower soon, I will exceed
my maximum descent profile, need lower NOW!"

Then "Matter of fact, we just exceeded it."

  #24  
Old July 31st 05, 05:38 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...

Some of the pilots at the carrier I used to work for had a standard speech
for center or TRACON controllers when they rode the jump seat on "fam"
trips: The captain would place his hand on the speed brake handle and
say,
"This is to correct my mistakes, not your's."

Cute, but I don't think it did much good.


It appears then that some are hesitant to use it to correct their mistakes.
In my experience aircraft are too high because they failed to descend in
time on a discretionary clearance far more often than because ATC didn't
clear them down in time.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Wow - heard on the air... (long) Nathan Young Piloting 68 July 25th 05 06:51 PM
Our first IFR cross-country trip: NY-MI-IL-MI-NY Longworth Piloting 16 July 15th 05 08:12 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.