Air to ground towing

Sure here -



"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 08:39:29 -0500, "Paul" wrote:

This was pretty common in Vietnam...

Today Army Helicopters are forbidden to do it.

Yes, but civilian versions do it. Columbia helicopters did something
interesting with one of theirs
http://www.colheli.com/colheli.html and click on the "news and events"
item and scroll down to "hover barge photo"
------------------------------------------
NO, use John Mee3 at comcast dot net (remove the spaces and do the
obvious with the "dot" and the "at"

the original pic never made it to my server.... could someone pls repost?

redc1c4,
TIA!
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

"adelsonsl" wrote in message
...
CAN YOU SIZE THESE DOWN PLEASE
"Paul" wrote in message
...
This was pretty common in Vietnam...

Today Army Helicopters are forbidden to do it.

"adelsonsl" wrote in message
...
CAN YOU SIZE THESE DOWN PLEASE
"Paul" wrote in message
...
This was pretty common in Vietnam...

Today Army Helicopters are forbidden to do it.

Why such ridiculously huge file sizes? Irfanview is a good freebie if you
need to manipulate file sizes and compressions for images.

HTH
Pop`


Paul wrote:
Sure here -



"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 08:39:29 -0500, "Paul"
wrote:
This was pretty common in Vietnam...

Today Army Helicopters are forbidden to do it.

Yes, but civilian versions do it. Columbia helicopters did something
interesting with one of theirs
http://www.colheli.com/colheli.html and click on the "news and
events" item and scroll down to "hover barge photo"
------------------------------------------
NO, use John Mee3 at comcast dot net (remove the spaces and do the
obvious with the "dot" and the "at"

the original pic never made it to my server.... could someone pls
repost? redc1c4,
TIA!
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

Paul wrote:
Sure here -




Great pics Paul, you shouldn't feel discouraged by some of the responses
here - although your pics were unusually large.


Just another tip on technique, when you're reposting an image - it's handy
to put the word "repost" or similar in the subject line - otherwise people
will download the identical image again.


Are they your pics, do you have more ?


There's a couple of ex-113 jockeys here and speaking for myself, I really
enjoy seeing unusual pics of them. Generally speaking, ANY on-topic
pic of a '113 is unusual in an aviation newsgroup. Like a pig, it's an
unlikely bird.



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

Chuck (in SC) wrote:

Great job.. Nice color correction..
Chuck (in SC)



Thanks Chuck, it's hard to guess the actual shade of green the carriers
were, mine was always dust coloured.



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

"Dave Kearton" wrote in message
...
Paul wrote:
Sure here -




Great pics Paul, you shouldn't feel discouraged by some of the responses
here - although your pics were unusually large.


Just another tip on technique, when you're reposting an image - it's
handy
to put the word "repost" or similar in the subject line - otherwise people
will download the identical image again.


Are they your pics, do you have more ?


There's a couple of ex-113 jockeys here and speaking for myself, I really
enjoy seeing unusual pics of them. Generally speaking, ANY on-topic
pic of a '113 is unusual in an aviation newsgroup. Like a pig, it's an
unlikely bird.



--

Cheers

Dave Kearton



Howdy Dave,

I scanned those pictures for a friend at work, they were taken by his
cousin (one if the track drivers)
and he wanted a electronic copy of them.

I routinely work with large photo's so I guess I didn't think to resample
them and make them smaller before uploading them.

Thanks for the tips....

Paul

Paul wrote:
Howdy Dave,

I scanned those pictures for a friend at work, they were taken by
his cousin (one if the track drivers)
and he wanted a electronic copy of them.

I routinely work with large photo's so I guess I didn't think to
resample them and make them smaller before uploading them.

Thanks for the tips....

Paul


Please pass on our regards to your friend an his cousin, good first-person
pics here are like rocking-horse poop.


--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

In article , dkearton///////
@ozemail.com.au mumbled
Paul wrote:
Sure here -




Great pics Paul, you shouldn't feel discouraged by some of the responses
here - although your pics were unusually large.


Just another tip on technique, when you're reposting an image - it's handy
to put the word "repost" or similar in the subject line - otherwise people
will download the identical image again.


Are they your pics, do you have more ?


There's a couple of ex-113 jockeys here and speaking for myself, I really
enjoy seeing unusual pics of them. Generally speaking, ANY on-topic
pic of a '113 is unusual in an aviation newsgroup. Like a pig, it's an
unlikely bird.

113's make good ice coolers too....



--
Usenetsaurus n. an early pedantic internet mammal, who survived on a
diet of static text and
cascading "threads."