Challenging instrument approaches?

I'm looking for challenging instrument approaches in the United States

Try MJX's ILS 6 approach. Try and fly the full proceedure (no vectors). It
has an interesting bend at the proceedure turn that is sure to disorient
some...of course I have never had a problem. (yeah right)...

Kobra


that I can have my students fly on the simulator.

I'd be interested in hearing your suggestions. Any type of IAP is
welcome as long as it makes the pilot work a little bit.

Tia

Richard Kowalski

wrote
I'm looking for challenging instrument approaches in the United States
that I can have my students fly on the simulator.

I'd be interested in hearing your suggestions. Any type of IAP is
welcome as long as it makes the pilot work a little bit.

If your simulator supports circling, try the NDB-F at EYQ. Configure
the winds to strongly favor rwy 9, set the vis to the minimum 1 mile,
and note the circling restriction. Fun.

Michael

In article ,
(Michael) wrote:

wrote
I'm looking for challenging instrument approaches in the United States
that I can have my students fly on the simulator.

I'd be interested in hearing your suggestions. Any type of IAP is
welcome as long as it makes the pilot work a little bit.

If your simulator supports circling, try the NDB-F at EYQ. Configure
the winds to strongly favor rwy 9, set the vis to the minimum 1 mile,
and note the circling restriction. Fun.

Michael

Wow. I've never seen an airport with 12 departures and only 2
approaches. Must be a heck of a place if so many more people want to
get out of there then get there in the first place :-)

Anyone able to get approach procedures for Greenland airports? I believe
there are some interesting ones there.


"Michael" wrote in message
om...
wrote
I'm looking for challenging instrument approaches in the United States
that I can have my students fly on the simulator.

I'd be interested in hearing your suggestions. Any type of IAP is
welcome as long as it makes the pilot work a little bit.

If your simulator supports circling, try the NDB-F at EYQ. Configure
the winds to strongly favor rwy 9, set the vis to the minimum 1 mile,
and note the circling restriction. Fun.

Michael

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:02:07 -0500, Saryon
wrote:

There's always the ever-popular KASE VOR/DME or GPS-C......

Yep. Already have that one!

Richard

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:51:34 GMT, "Art" wrote:


I always like the VOR or GPS RWY1 3R or L at KJFK.


If I understand this approach correctly, you can continue in if you
have the minimums AND the lead in lights are visible...

Am I correct, you DO NOT have to have the runway environment in sight,
just the Lead Ins?

Thx

Richard Kowalski

VOR/DME or GPS-C into ASE is fun. Dual VHF required and missed is to a
back-course. 7 degree GS is also fun for the un-initiated. The Roaring Fork
visual for this place looks like it would be a helluva ride coming in from
the South. "Radar Required - Mins 6000 and 10."

http://www.myairplane.com/databases/.../ASE_vd_gC.pdf



--
Jim Carter
Seen on a bumper sticker:
If you can read this, thank a teacher
If you can read this in English, thank a soldier.