DG-200 Life limit?

Hi guys,

Anyone know if there is a lfie limit on the DG-200?

Gregg

At 12:27 12 September 2010, Gregg Leslie wrote:

Anyone know if there is a lfie limit on the DG-200?


The current life is 12,000 hours.

Extended by TN 323-15 in 2007

http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/Data/TN...20TN323-15.pdf


Nick H

On Sep 12, 12:34*pm, "
wrote:
On Sep 12, 5:27*am, Gregg Leslie wrote:

Hi guys,

Anyone know if there is a lfie limit on the DG-200?

Gregg

1 year unless you pay DG for a new set of manuals every year

Al

Word from a DG owner last weekend is that EASA has nixed the new cover
page each year scam.
UH

On Sep 13, 3:25*pm, "
wrote:
On Sep 13, 5:14*am, wrote:



On Sep 12, 12:34*pm, "
wrote:

On Sep 12, 5:27*am, Gregg Leslie wrote:

Hi guys,

Anyone know if there is a lfie limit on the DG-200?

Gregg

1 year unless you pay DG for a new set of manuals every year

Al

Word from a DG owner last weekend is that EASA has nixed the new cover
page each year scam.
UH

Thats great news...

Al

Although people were not totally pleased with how DG handled the DG300
wing problem (some thought they should send everyone a new set of
wings) they did spend the money to figure out a workable solution.
Right now I suspect L-13 owners would be happy to pay a yearly fee in
order to get their planes back.

On Sep 13, 5:14*am, cernauta wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:34:51 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
1 year unless you pay DG for a new set of manuals every year

According to the following EASA document (the Type Certificate Data
Sheet), in Europe the old manuals are as valid as the new ones.

seehttp://www.easa.europa.eu/certification/type-certificates/docs/aircra....

Aldo

The US FAA answered the same thing. They sent out a policy letter
about 2 weeks ago.
What ever inspection criteria and manuals were in effect when
purchased, are what is required.
Not accounting for any ADs that the FAA would publish.

On Sep 13, 6:32*pm, BTiz wrote:
On Sep 13, 5:14*am, cernauta wrote:

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:34:51 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
1 year unless you pay DG for a new set of manuals every year

According to the following EASA document (the Type Certificate Data
Sheet), in Europe the old manuals are as valid as the new ones.

seehttp://www.easa.europa.eu/certification/type-certificates/docs/aircra...

Aldo

The US FAA answered the same thing. They sent out a policy letter
about 2 weeks ago.
What ever inspection criteria and manuals were in effect when
purchased, are what is required.
Not accounting for any ADs that the FAA would publish.

Didn't Herr Weber also mention not selling parts* to those who didn't
pay the annual fee?

*not that they've show that they can actually deliver anything other
than common hardware for say, an LS4.

Tried to find this policy letter on faa.gov, but no luck. Link, anyone?

Thanks,
Lars Peder


"BTiz" wrote in message
...
On Sep 13, 5:14 am, cernauta wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:34:51 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
1 year unless you pay DG for a new set of manuals every year

According to the following EASA document (the Type Certificate Data
Sheet), in Europe the old manuals are as valid as the new ones.

seehttp://www.easa.europa.eu/certification/type-certificates/docs/aircra...

Aldo

The US FAA answered the same thing. They sent out a policy letter
about 2 weeks ago.
What ever inspection criteria and manuals were in effect when
purchased, are what is required.
Not accounting for any ADs that the FAA would publish.