A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Low flight and wildlife



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 17th 07, 07:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Low flight and wildlife

I see on a sectional chart a box that says "The Islands, Rocks, and Reefs
along the Pacific Coast-Line from 42°00'N to 46°00'N are National Wildlife
Refuges. Low flights may disturb wildlife resulting in a violation of Federal
law."

Unfortunately, the chart doesn't say what constitutes "low flight." What
altitudes do they have in mind?

Also, when there are areas that say "Pilots are requested to maintain a
minimum altitude of xxxx' AGL ..." just how strong a "request" is it? What
happens if you fail to heed the request?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old April 17th 07, 08:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
rq3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Low flight and wildlife



Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?


Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.

Rip
  #3  
Old April 17th 07, 08:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Jim Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 437
Default Low flight and wildlife

Mxsmanic wrote:
I see on a sectional chart a box that says "The Islands, Rocks, and Reefs
along the Pacific Coast-Line from 42°00'N to 46°00'N are National Wildlife
Refuges. Low flights may disturb wildlife resulting in a violation of Federal
law."

Unfortunately, the chart doesn't say what constitutes "low flight." What
altitudes do they have in mind?

Also, when there are areas that say "Pilots are requested to maintain a
minimum altitude of xxxx' AGL ..." just how strong a "request" is it? What
happens if you fail to heed the request?


2000' AGL


  #4  
Old April 17th 07, 08:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Paul kgyy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 283
Default Low flight and wildlife

On Apr 17, 2:04 pm, rq3 wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?


Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.

Rip


Give him a break - he did buy a sectional :-)

  #5  
Old April 17th 07, 08:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Low flight and wildlife

On Apr 17, 3:04 pm, rq3 wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?


Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.


Hahaha! What an ORIGINAL joke !! A real kneeslapper !!
Yessirreebob... you sure know how to come up some zingers, boy I can
tell ya.

Hint: don't quite your day job yet.

  #6  
Old April 17th 07, 09:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
rq3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Low flight and wildlife

Great. Now all he has to do is invest the time to study his new
sectional BEFORE he starts in with his inane questions.

Rip

Paul kgyy wrote:
On Apr 17, 2:04 pm, rq3 wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?

Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.

Rip


Give him a break - he did buy a sectional :-)

  #7  
Old April 17th 07, 09:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
rq3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Low flight and wildlife

Kev, sarcasm isn't necessarily meant to be humorous. Your own post is a
terrific example. But thanks for the tip.

Rip

Kev wrote:
On Apr 17, 3:04 pm, rq3 wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?

Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.


Hahaha! What an ORIGINAL joke !! A real kneeslapper !!
Yessirreebob... you sure know how to come up some zingers, boy I can
tell ya.

Hint: don't quite your day job yet.

  #8  
Old April 17th 07, 11:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Low flight and wildlife

it is on the cover of the sectional

"Paul kgyy" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 17, 2:04 pm, rq3 wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
What happens if you fail to heed the request?


Absolutely nothing. The wildlife on the Pacific Coast can't hear your
Microsoft game located in Paris, France.

Rip


Give him a break - he did buy a sectional :-)



  #9  
Old April 17th 07, 11:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
muff528
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 304
Default Low flight and wildlife


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
I see on a sectional chart a box that says "The Islands, Rocks, and Reefs
along the Pacific Coast-Line from 42°00'N to 46°00'N are National Wildlife
Refuges. Low flights may disturb wildlife resulting in a violation of
Federal
law."


Something should be done about wildlife breaking federal law.


Unfortunately, the chart doesn't say what constitutes "low flight." What
altitudes do they have in mind?


Low enough to scare the animals.


Also, when there are areas that say "Pilots are requested to maintain a
minimum altitude of xxxx' AGL ..." just how strong a "request" is it?


Stronger than a UN mandate but not as strong as a non-binding resolution.
Somewhere between a "double-dog dare" and forced community service.

What
happens if you fail to heed the request?


The wildlife gets disturbed.


--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.


Sorry..... couldn't help but inject a little corny humor since I don't know
any legitimate answers to these questions. :-)

Don't take offense mx, I'm "strongly" on your side. ;-)

BSBCU, TP


  #10  
Old April 18th 07, 12:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 896
Default Low flight and wildlife

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

I see on a sectional chart a box that says "The Islands, Rocks, and
Reefs along the Pacific Coast-Line from 42°00'N to 46°00'N are
National Wildlife Refuges. Low flights may disturb wildlife resulting
in a violation of Federal law."

Unfortunately, the chart doesn't say what constitutes "low flight."
What altitudes do they have in mind?


S\Doesn't matter,. You'll never fly over them.



Berti e
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single Seat Aircraft: Flight Reviews and Flight Tests Robert M. Gary Piloting 1 August 17th 05 11:17 PM
NEW FLIGHT SCHOOL - Best in Flight Aviation Academy - Morristown,New Jersey Dave Vioreanu Owning 0 April 22nd 05 02:55 AM
NEW FLIGHT SCHOOL - Best in Flight Aviation Academy - Morristown,New Jersey Dave Vioreanu Piloting 0 April 22nd 05 02:55 AM
NEW FLIGHT SCHOOL - Best in Flight Aviation Academy - Morristown, New Jersey Guy Elden Jr Piloting 0 April 21st 05 04:37 PM
Does anybody know a link to a real picture of the X-43 in flight sans Pegasus or better yet a video clip of the flight? Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 0 April 3rd 04 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.