If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:02:26 -0700, wrote: So, you guys would have probably flown to the FAF at 7,000 then descended to touchdown (300 feet) in some 5 miles. ;-) I don't have a copy of the approach at hand, and I cannot recall how I would have flown it. Clearly your supposition is ludicrous. However, I would NOT have descended from 7,000' until I was on a charted portion of the approach. If you have a copy of that approach, I would be able to give you more precise information. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) It's on alt.binaries.pictures.aviation And, I stand corrected, there was information in the plan view (that should have been in the provile view, that would have permitted descent from 7,000 11.6 miles prior to the FAF. The flight crash 2 or 3 miles prior to ROUND HILL because they descended to 1,800 prior to ROUND HILL based on their training and use of the profile view. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna 206 Pilot position....... | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 28th 05 08:27 PM |
Glad to hear the initial reports were wrong about accidents, as they usually are. | Tedstriker | Home Built | 0 | April 19th 04 02:52 AM |
3 blade prop position on 6cyl engine. | Paul Lee | Home Built | 3 | February 26th 04 12:47 AM |
LED for position lights | Jerry Springer | Home Built | 2 | August 19th 03 01:43 AM |
Wrong Brothers Air Force Party Invite | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 1 | July 20th 03 10:55 PM |