A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Photo Pilot Certificates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old September 24th 04, 07:36 PM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

However, you sound dangerous to me. Perhaps the government should make you
wear an ankle bracelet or something so that your movements can be tracked 24
hours a day. Maybe you should even be confined to your house.


I have said nothing at all about "thought control". I've been speaking strictly
about the enforcement of EXISTING US immigration laws. You are diverting from
the relevant subject and trying to make it sound as if I am FOR additional
"Big Brother" type security measures. If you will read my posts carefully you
will see that I am totally against having additional burdens placed upon
America citizens.... who's only crime appears to be that of being licensed
pilot post 9-11.



  #42  
Old September 24th 04, 07:50 PM
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:31:38 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

Betcha they just
link it to the medical certificate.



Oh no....As if they don't already have enough "non-medical" related
ways to pull your medical. Now they'll be able to revoke you if
you're not photogenic enough!

Time for some plastic surgery to get ready for this one!

z
  #43  
Old September 24th 04, 07:50 PM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


C J Campbell wrote:

Actually, you need at least three shifts, so 500,000 soldiers just watching
the border. For every soldier on the front lines, you need at least seven
others in support, so three and a half million soldiers just to watch the
Canadian border. That still does not stop people coming through legitimate
checkpoints with falsified documents or whatever. Nor does it account for
aircraft or boats. Neither does it count up the cost of the enormously long
lines at the border while confiscate everybody's fingernail clippers.


You have succeeded in taking my original comments so completely out of context
that the discussion now bears no relevance to my original post.

I will quote two sentences from my original posts and would ask you to find
anything in them that would tend to indicate I was advocating what you say
above. Words in caps are emphasis I have added assist in comprehension of
the meaning of the sentences as they were written.

"I submit that a reasonable person would conclude that a good use of a
PERCENTAGE of US forces might be to ASISTS the Border Patrol monitor and
secure these borders to a greater extent than they are today."

"I believe that a legitimate use of our military forces (and their associated
technology) would be to HELP safeguard our borders."

The military has some exclusive technology capabilities which could be used
to assist the border patrol do their jobs. This same position has been advocated
by a number of congressman and senators. I happen to agree.

  #44  
Old September 24th 04, 08:02 PM
Rutger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't have any opinion on who takes the photo. It's a
once-in-a-lifetime hassle. My FSDO is 60 miles away, reasonable trip
fo rme. I suppose it's different in Idaho?


If big brother would actually have his way, that trip to the FSDO to
get your picture taken might also turn into: Bring all your logbooks,
submit a blood sample, submit a hair sample, and please step into the
polygraph room before we can even permit you to step in front of the
camera.
  #45  
Old September 24th 04, 08:09 PM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

Most of the 9/11 terrorists were here legally.


Yes, initially. but at least half of them were subsequently found
to be in violation of the terms of their Visas.

But with the INS not enforcing anything what did it matter?

  #46  
Old September 24th 04, 08:14 PM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Martin Hotze wrote:
Blanche wrote:


Why can't we use the same approach for the new FAA ID? Same process
only now you add the existing FAA cert.




not to long ago everybody was fighting the new FAA *foto* ID. Now it seems that
everybody is OK with this and we are only discussing the way it can be handled.

Exactly. We've all pretty much given in. Now we can get ready for the next round
of additional "security" measures. It seems Mr. Weiner already has some ideas.

  #47  
Old September 24th 04, 08:44 PM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message

...


Blanche wrote:

The visa expired? The school is responsible for a) expelling the
student and b) immediately informing INS.


A visa allows one to enter the country. You do not have to leave when it

expires.
Once you're in the country, the INS tells you how long you can stay.

Further, a student visa doesn't expire as long as the student is enrolled

and making
progress towards their course of study. They've got 60 days after they

finish to
get out (or make other arrangements). So it's not that you can be

studying and have
a student visa expire, it's because you stop studying that the terms of

your entry under
that visa becomes invalid. It's actually the schools completion of the

"certificate of
eligibility" that lets you be in the country on the visa.


Yes, and I'm sure we can depend on all the university administrators in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, to duly notify John Ashcroft's Department of
Justice of every such event.

Best,
-cwk.


  #48  
Old September 25th 04, 12:51 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message

...

"Blanche" wrote in message

3) Here for tourist reasons? When I visit a foreign country, even the
hotel wants my passport. Why not here?


What do these hotels do for their own citizens? And how do you tell a
foreigner from a citizen in this country?

Actually, it's an anachronism. I haven't been asked for my passport of
late even at the borders (and sometimes not even then). The last time
I had to show my passport to a hotel was over 15 years ago and that was
in Japan.


True. But if Mr. Kontiki walks in the door, be sure to demand his passport.


  #49  
Old September 25th 04, 12:54 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"kontiki" wrote in message
...
C J Campbell wrote:

Most of the 9/11 terrorists were here legally.


Yes, initially. but at least half of them were subsequently found
to be in violation of the terms of their Visas.

But with the INS not enforcing anything what did it matter?


OK, a visa expires. The INS is notified. They go out to the alien's last
known address and he has apparently moved and left no forwarding address.
Now what?


  #50  
Old September 25th 04, 02:53 AM
Javier Henderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Martin Hotze writes:

"marcelfrancisci" wrote:

the medical
examiner is the only person that represents the FAA in all the major
countries.


the local FAA designated examiner here in our area is an Austrian citizen. Do
you think this beeing a good idea having him making the fotos and clearing them?


Our state (California) governor is also from Austria.

THEY ARE TAKING OVER!

-jav
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sport Pilot inconsistency frustrated flier Piloting 19 September 10th 04 04:53 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Student as PIC in IMC? Geo. Anderson Instrument Flight Rules 40 May 29th 04 05:09 PM
definition of "dual controls" Lee Elson Instrument Flight Rules 4 April 24th 04 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.