If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... As the rest of the thread up to this point indicates, there is a desire to redirect a GPS guided munition post launch. The means to reprogram the munition would require some data link. Irrelevent. GPS with FOG does all that already. Fibre Optic Gyro. AMSTE (Affordable Moving Surface Target Engagement) uses a post-release data link to compensate for the long time of flight of the ballistic weapon used (JDAM). We already discussed that and Weiss just wanted to argue. Actually I wanted to debunk your inaccurate claims regarding a "require[d]" data link and some "GPS with FOG" system that "does all that already." While data link is one method to accomplish the mission, there are other methods in development, and have been for many years. From Paul's description of the current state of AMSTE, it does not appear to yet be ready for deployment in a CAS scenario. Maybe it will get there; maybe not. Maybe we will have to spend the $$ for a true autonomous terminal seeker for those situations where risk to the troops is too high for non-terminally-guided weapons and/or data link is not an option. The various flavors of Mav already give us a linkless approach to precision kill of moving targets but despite being in production forever, the cost is too high (and requires good visibility). AMSTE uses RADAR as the primary sensor and the link allows weapons release above the cloud deck. That may be one of the drivers for the overall architecture (which knowledge I've derived entirely from reading AvWeek and IDR). Whether CAS strikes will be allowed without visual confirmation of FLOT and target is a doctrinal issue but a lot will depend on the development trajectory of Blue Force Tracking (BFT) as well as of the AMSTE technology set.. None of this stuff is Ready For Prime Time yet. AMSTE in particular is in an Advanced Developement stage. Northrop-Grumman just demonstrated successful geolocation and strike of a moving target using a single airborne RADAR sensor. All prior tests had used two airborne sensors to get the spatial resolution needed. It seems to me that a major advantage of a data linked approach to CAS strikes, whether RADAR as a primary sensor or not is the ability to update aimpoints while the weapon is in flight. That's not a new thing, being the way AGM-130 works. Data links are becoming ubiquitous around the battlefield these days. In the case of a command link to a weapon in flight, the link is geometrically resistant to jamming in addition to the more conventional AJ techniques. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|