If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Twin Comanche comparisons
On 2006-01-28, Dico wrote:
on the cabin sizes between the early Twin Comanches and the later models that have the extra window. I'm curious as to the leg room a back seat passenger may have. ie: would someone 6'5" and 250lbs be comfortable back there? Henry Spellman was exactly right about Comanche cabins. I have a 1965 single, and at 6'4" I can sit comfortably behind the pilot seat in its rearmost position. There's not a large gap between the back of the front seat and the front edge of the rear bench (which is over the spar) but the rear bench is very deep. In my plane the back seat may be more comfortable than the front! But it probably has a lot fewer person-hours, too. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
AOPA Twin Comanche | Rosspilot | Piloting | 79 | December 8th 04 07:23 PM |
twin tail questions | Kevin Horton | Home Built | 12 | January 2nd 04 03:21 PM |
Comanche 260 - 1965 | Sami Saydjari | Owning | 5 | December 8th 03 12:24 AM |
True costs of a light twin... | Captain Wubba | Owning | 20 | November 20th 03 02:32 AM |