A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AS34 - new electric standard class self launcher



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old April 10th 19, 02:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default AS34 - new electric standard class self launcher

On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 1:26:49 AM UTC-4, krasw wrote:
Interesting! Judging from the picture they are using the new 33 fuselage and I bet everything else is new, too. If it's std. class only (no 18m), they are competing against light selflaunchers like GP and MiniLAK. I was waiting for someone to introduce light racing class electric selflauncher like GP15. I guess AS thought that there is more room for improvement in std. class where all competing gliders are designed 20+ years ago.


I haven't seen anything of the engineering of the '33 so comments are speculation.
I doubt there will be much, if any difference between the '33 fuselage and the '29 fuselage. I expect it will be a new, smaller area wing with likely an airfoil evolution.
Geometry wise the '24,'27, 28,and '29 are almost exactly the same, except wing root and rudder.
If one starts with the '28E, which is engineered, tooled, and certified, you have a 15/18 airframe with an engine bay, ready to move forward. It also has enough wing area to keep the wing loading increase low enough to make self launch practical on about 25KW available from the system used in the 32EL.
I would expect the target market is pilots who want self launch capability as most important, and contest performance secondary.
Creating new ships is very expensive and risky. This could be a solution that moderates both.
Later, when proven, translating into an 18M ship like the '29 or '33 is a comparatively small task and risk. Going to 15M variants is more questionable due to low wing area and resulting high wing loadings. My '24E, converted to electric, is at 9 lb wing loading dry on 107 square feet.
FWIW- not much
UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Standard Class -- Day 4 Retting Soaring 0 August 5th 18 02:14 AM
next gen standard class? ric375 Soaring 7 February 3rd 10 10:15 PM
US Standard Class and World Class Nationals at Hobbs Ken Sorenson Soaring 7 July 16th 04 04:03 AM
Antares electric self-launcher in this months Soaring Stewart Kissel Soaring 2 June 1st 04 02:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.