A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Unclear Clearance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old December 18th 05, 06:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unclear Clearance

There is no similarity.

Yes there is.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #52  
Old December 18th 05, 06:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unclear Clearance


"Jose" wrote in message
...

Yes there is.


What is the similarity?


  #53  
Old December 18th 05, 03:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unclear Clearance

What is the similarity?

In both cases the controller uttered something that did not match what
he intended to mean. In both cases clarification was called for. In
both cases the controller then uttered something that did match what he
originally intended to mean.

In both cases the controller's intent did not change, but the clearance
the pilot received did.

I call that an amended clearance. Inadvertently amended perhaps, but
amended nonetheless.

But at this point I don't care either way what you call it.

Jose
--
You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #54  
Old December 24th 05, 02:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unclear Clearance


"Jose" wrote in message
t...

In both cases the controller uttered something that did not match what he
intended to mean. In both cases clarification was called for. In both
cases the controller then uttered something that did match what he
originally intended to mean.


What did the controller utter that did match what he originally intended to
mean in the first case?



In both cases the controller's intent did not change, but the clearance
the pilot received did.

I call that an amended clearance.


I call it an amended clearance when the clearance is changed.



Inadvertently amended perhaps, but amended nonetheless.


Inadvertently? You don't think the controller intended to assign a
different heading after the request for clarification?


But at this point I don't care either way what you call it.


Then you won't respond to this message.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No SID in clearance, fly it anyway? Roy Smith Instrument Flight Rules 195 November 28th 05 10:06 PM
Taxi Clearance Ron Rosenfeld Instrument Flight Rules 27 September 29th 05 01:57 PM
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U Judah Instrument Flight Rules 8 February 27th 04 06:02 PM
Q about lost comms on weird clearance Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 34 February 2nd 04 09:11 PM
Picking up a Clearance Airborne Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 03 01:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.