If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Peter wrote:
Doug Carter wrote Might, except the glideslope is not guarenteed below something like 100'. The localiser should be, otherwise CAT 2/3 approaches wouldn't work. The coupled autopilot uses a radalt for the last ~ 100ft but it uses the localiser all the way down, AFAIK. In an emergency and with no other options, technically speaking, one should be able to fly an ILS all the way down, in 0/0 conditions, and walk away from it. On an ILS, at TDZE + 100, you are 2000 feet out from the GS antenna, or 1000 out from the threshold. You would have to make some drastic pitch changes (i.e. double your descent rate) to land short of the threshold from that point. If you made it to DH with the needles centered, just hold that pitch attitude and power setting another 10 seconds or so, and you're there. That being said, it's not something you want to do unless you've run out of other choices. I've done it once -- when I was an instrument student. My instructor took me out on an evening when the ground fog was already starting to settle in when we took off. By the time we came back a couple of hours later, things were pretty well socked in. Our home field (CDW) had a localizer only; we took one (rather pointless) shot at that, then went to the next field over (MMU) which had an ILS. That too was below minimums, but we landed anyway. Fortunately, the same conditions that lead to ground fog also make for an easy ILS -- zero wind. I kept the needles in the donut all the way down and just kept going when we got to the DH. Eventually, the runway loomed out of the soup and we landed. It was so thick, we could only see a couple of runway edge lights ahead. The tower never saw us. Good for war stories, but not an experience I'd like to repeat. Of course, we were infected with a bad case of get-home-itis, or at least my instructor was and I was foolish enough to go along with it. He had to be to work the next day, and landing 10 miles away from home was close enough. We had fuel to make it to someplace with better weather but much less convenient. Given a choice of where to bust minimums, I'd go for someplace that has a published Cat-II/III approach. Even if you're not certified for it, you know the nav signals are good down to the ground, and those runways tend to have gazillion-megawatt approach light systems. Might as well give yourself every advantage you can get. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASW19b best descent rate on approach (full airbrakes) | Robert Sharpe | Soaring | 1 | April 30th 05 11:41 AM |
descent below minimums | hsm | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | January 11th 05 06:33 PM |
BRS and descent rate | Roger Long | Piloting | 21 | May 7th 04 05:34 PM |
Avoiding Shock Cooling in Quick Descent | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 32 | January 21st 04 04:32 AM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |