![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was wondering if there were any retired Naval Aviators who have
flight hours logged with the dreaded F7U Cutlass. I work at the National Museum of Naval Aviation here in Pensacola. We currently have one on display. Aesthetically speaking, it's a pretty nice looking plane, but I have read a lot of negative things about it. Were the flaws merely due to the low performance of the Westinghouse engine? Were there other flaws? I would love to hear any stories from people who flew this plane. Thank you and Happy Holidays |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Dec 2004 10:35:25 -0800, "MuseumTech"
postulated : I was wondering if there were any retired Naval Aviators who have flight hours logged with the dreaded F7U Cutlass. I work at the National Museum of Naval Aviation here in Pensacola. We currently have one on display. Aesthetically speaking, it's a pretty nice looking plane, but I have read a lot of negative things about it. Were the flaws merely due to the low performance of the Westinghouse engine? Were there other flaws? I would love to hear any stories from people who flew this plane. Thank you and Happy Holidays If you Google F7U Cutlass you will get several hits. http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/specs/vought/f7u-3.htm Buried down in there are several comments about the Cutlass and one is allegedly by a F7U pilot with his e-mail address shown. There are several more hits on the F7U. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't fly it (got its successor, the F-8 which used some of the concepts
developed in the Cutlass). From those that did, if you don't mind 2nd hand info. Systems (Hydraulics, electrical, etc) were unreliable. Underpowered in basic engine (as were most navy jets of the era). The tailless design used ailevators (ailerons also serving as elevators) which unfortunately acted to decamber the wing (reducing lift) as they were commanded trailing edge up (to increase attitude, AOA and lift). It was unforgiving around the boat. I think it enjoyed a level of mediocrity shore based (fun to fly, one great turn), but never actually deployed. The Blues used one briefly as a solo aircraft. First Navy jet with afterburner. Longest nose strut ever installed in a tactical aircraft. Seat modified to tilt forward for improved vis during approach. Noteworthy developments. Balsa/aluminum sandwich (the balsa was cut crossgrain, Vought had a patented name for it, can't remember anymore) construction for lightweight strength ... a poor man's honeycomb concept. Trim system using potentiometer (thumbwheels) on stick for pitch and roll trim vice the ubiquitous "coolly hat" trim button ... superior IMO, perhaps not as reliable though I never experienced a primary trim failure in the F-8. Early yaw and roll stab systems. R / John "Greasy Rider" wrote in message ... On 22 Dec 2004 10:35:25 -0800, "MuseumTech" postulated : I was wondering if there were any retired Naval Aviators who have flight hours logged with the dreaded F7U Cutlass. I work at the National Museum of Naval Aviation here in Pensacola. We currently have one on display. Aesthetically speaking, it's a pretty nice looking plane, but I have read a lot of negative things about it. Were the flaws merely due to the low performance of the Westinghouse engine? Were there other flaws? I would love to hear any stories from people who flew this plane. Thank you and Happy Holidays If you Google F7U Cutlass you will get several hits. http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/specs/vought/f7u-3.htm Buried down in there are several comments about the Cutlass and one is allegedly by a F7U pilot with his e-mail address shown. There are several more hits on the F7U. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:51:44 -0600, "John Carrier"
postulated : I think it enjoyed a level of mediocrity shore based (fun to fly, one great turn), but never actually deployed. While at Port Lyautey in 1956 I saw a squadron of Cutlass (VA-66?) stop in for a few weeks. I think they were from the Champlain operating in the Med. One did a wheels up landing at Lyautey and the pilot suffered a broken back. A wheel watch duty was created until they left. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"...Longest nose strut ever installed in a tactical aircraft. Seat modified
to tilt forward for improved vis during approach...." I remember seeing a movie of carrier deck crashes where a Cutlass came in cocked up, snagged a wire, slammed down, drove the nose wheel strut up through the cockpit, fired the ejection seat, seat and pilot came down in the fore deck pack. Truncated yet another promising Naval Aviator career! On the Shangri La 1956 deployment we had a VX-4 Cutlass four plane det. with Sparrow missiles for early fleet evaluation. They were all old pilots (but still a little bold) who had few if any problems flying their "barn doors" around the boat. WDA CDR USN Ret. end "John Carrier" wrote in message ... I didn't fly it (got its successor, the F-8 which used some of the concepts developed in the Cutlass). From those that did, if you don't mind 2nd hand info. Systems (Hydraulics, electrical, etc) were unreliable. Underpowered in basic engine (as were most navy jets of the era). The tailless design used ailevators (ailerons also serving as elevators) which unfortunately acted to decamber the wing (reducing lift) as they were commanded trailing edge up (to increase attitude, AOA and lift). It was unforgiving around the boat. I think it enjoyed a level of mediocrity shore based (fun to fly, one great turn), but never actually deployed. The Blues used one briefly as a solo aircraft. First Navy jet with afterburner. Longest nose strut ever installed in a tactical aircraft. Seat modified to tilt forward for improved vis during approach. Noteworthy developments. Balsa/aluminum sandwich (the balsa was cut crossgrain, Vought had a patented name for it, can't remember anymore) construction for lightweight strength ... a poor man's honeycomb concept. Trim system using potentiometer (thumbwheels) on stick for pitch and roll trim vice the ubiquitous "coolly hat" trim button ... superior IMO, perhaps not as reliable though I never experienced a primary trim failure in the F-8. Early yaw and roll stab systems. R / John "Greasy Rider" wrote in message ... On 22 Dec 2004 10:35:25 -0800, "MuseumTech" postulated : I was wondering if there were any retired Naval Aviators who have flight hours logged with the dreaded F7U Cutlass. I work at the National Museum of Naval Aviation here in Pensacola. We currently have one on display. Aesthetically speaking, it's a pretty nice looking plane, but I have read a lot of negative things about it. Were the flaws merely due to the low performance of the Westinghouse engine? Were there other flaws? I would love to hear any stories from people who flew this plane. Thank you and Happy Holidays If you Google F7U Cutlass you will get several hits. http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/specs/vought/f7u-3.htm Buried down in there are several comments about the Cutlass and one is allegedly by a F7U pilot with his e-mail address shown. There are several more hits on the F7U. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My father bored some holes in the sky in the F7U, in both the
non-afterburner and afterburner versions, while CO of VX-5 in '54-'55. Ray Hawkins ran the F7U program in the squadron. Got some photos around here somewhere. I've heard it said that the only reason the Navy bought the F7U was to keep Vought in business until they could develop the F8U. Can't vouch for that, though. Rich |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And Ray Hawkins was a wheel at the Museum for a long time ... maybe he
left some papers in the library. Might be worth a look. Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
turn), but never actually deployed. The Blues used one briefly as a solo
It did deploy. _____________ José Herculano |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since you are from the museum, do you know Stoney Myock? Supposed to be on the
staff there. Retired USMC Aviator, former Blues member. P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cutlass was deployed to the Pacific around 1955/6. One came into Naha
AB, Okinawa, while I was there flying F86Ds in the 25 FIS. We were ready to be impressed when this exotic fighter with two (2!) afterburners took off. Unfortunately, we were not at all impressed - its T/O performance was marginal. We did get to walk around it while it was parked on the ramp. BTW not only did that bird have the longest nose gear strut, I think it was also the thickest and heaviest one ever mounted on a fighter. -Walt BJ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So Who Has More Military Command Experience, Bush Or Kerry? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Military Aviation | 11 | April 22nd 04 01:27 AM |
So Who Has More Military Command Experience, Bush Or Kerry? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Naval Aviation | 11 | April 19th 04 05:12 PM |
Once again-Threshold, The Blue Angels Experience | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 28 | February 8th 04 12:22 AM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |
I just bought X-Plane and want to share my experience | Bruce Shankle | Home Built | 2 | July 21st 03 05:48 PM |