If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
'continue' as used by tower controler
I was returning to my home base this morning and was cleared down to 4500'
from 5500' by Tucson approach (pattern altitude is 3400'). On the handoff to the tower I called in and said I was 'through 5300'. The only words back from the Tower were 'Cherokee 54405, continue'. This was the first time I had received this instruction and assumed (yes, bad idea) that I was being told to continue inbound to the pattern. I leveled at 4500' and continued inbound. As I got closer to the pattern I asked the tower controller if I could descend to pattern altitude. He replied that he had given me permission on first contact. I continued on down and landed. Is this a commonly used phraseology from ATC? I would have thought just using the word 'continue' would be too ambiguous for the likes of the FAA. -- Regards, Mike http://mywebpage.netscape.com/amountainaero/fspic1.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
Contract Tower Program - Discussion Thread | running with scissors | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | April 22nd 04 04:04 AM |
Contract Tower Program - Discussion Thread | running with scissors | Military Aviation | 6 | April 22nd 04 04:04 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |