If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
Matt Barrow wrote:
"Jackie" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: "Jackie" wrote in message ... I understand that ATC radar uses an encoding altimeter and a transponder operating with Mode C to determine an aircraft's altitude. Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A only or just a primary return. If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? In other words how does the radar know that the aircraft is actually 3 nm away laterally and not 4.25 nm (approx slant distance at that altitude)? Asquared + B squared = C squared, I'd guess. And how does it separate A and B? "A" is the radar range, "B" is garnered from the encoding altimiter. Huh? In the example I provided, "Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A only..." there is *no encoding altimeter* so your point doesn't make sense here. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
In article ,
Jackie wrote: That's interesting. So if what you say is correct, an airport surveillance radar has very little coverage of the area, say at the top of a class B airspace because to cover that high an angle is "wasteful." For example, a VFR plane flying legally just above the B ceiling could very well be out of coverage of the radar that is supposed to be also monitoring another high performance aircraft poking through that ceiling at a high rate of speed. I'm not sure I agree with such an energy saving measure. Over the top of a class B airport is where the planes taking off from that airport usually aren't. They go out the sides, not straight up. There is usually more then one radar feed for a TRACON, so although the radar at the primary airport for the class B can't see right above it, other radars in the area provide that coverage. For example, SFO has a radar station, as does OAK and NUQ (Moffett Field). They overlap each other so there is fairly complete coverage. John -- John Clear - http://www.clear-prop.org/ |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
Jackie wrote:
Brian Whatcott wrote: Jackie wrote: ... If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)?.... I am late into the thread. But you are presumably talking about an area surveillance radar. Its fan beam does not typically stick 45 degrees up into the sky. Too wasteful of energy. That's interesting. So if what you say is correct, an airport surveillance radar has very little coverage of the area, say at the top of a class B airspace because to cover that high an angle is "wasteful." For example, a VFR plane flying legally just above the B ceiling could very well be out of coverage of the radar that is supposed to be also monitoring another high performance aircraft poking through that ceiling at a high rate of speed. I'm not sure I agree with such an energy saving measure. Another concept to ponder: if its beam WERE able to steer up at 45 degrees or more, what do you think its path would look like on a plan position indicator? (a regular display). You've mentioned its slant range is 4.25 miles at 3 mile distance horizontally. 30 seconds later, it might be overhead: where would it paint in terms of range? Three miles?? A circular range ring at 3 miles, all round the display? My distances where small to keep the math simple for discussion purposes, not to suggest what an actual display would include. Geez. Your understanding of the concept of airfield control radars and surveillance radars is incomplete. At a particular airfield the area of most interest is the approaches, and potential conflicts. High flying traffic is of no interest. The range limit of airfield radars may be in the 30 mile radius range. If you work out the antenna angle needed to view an aircraft at 10,000ft at 30 miles, you will see that the desired angle is not large. (4 deg) The beam's vertical fan may be as low as 5 to 10 degrees. But this is tiltable. Area surveillance radars do not operate typically as singletons. They look much further. They work with secondary transponders. Brian W |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
"Matt Barrow" wrote:
"Jackie" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: "Jackie" wrote in message ... I understand that ATC radar uses an encoding altimeter and a transponder operating with Mode C to determine an aircraft's altitude. Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A only or just a primary return. If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? In other words how does the radar know that the aircraft is actually 3 nm away laterally and not 4.25 nm (approx slant distance at that altitude)? Asquared + B squared = C squared, I'd guess. And how does it separate A and B? "A" is the radar range, "B" is garnered from the encoding altimiter. Nit: Actually "C" would be radar range and either "A" or "B" would be from the altimeter, solving then for "B" or "A". |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
It does not correct.. Radar Range is slant range.. so using RAW Radar and
Skin Paint.. or even a Transponder Mode3 only, 4 codes, you will get a ring around the mainbang (radar location) as the aircraft approaches the radar site. It may disappear if smack on directly overhead until exiting the donut hole on the other side. I believe even Mode3C with digital displays have the same problems, but with extensive radar coverage in most areas, the digital display is a mosaic display of multiple radar feeds with the best target for a given location coming from a certain radar. So another radar will "paint" the area over the "mainbang" of the other radar. This does not always happen depending on multiple radar coverage available. BT "Jackie" wrote in message ... I understand that ATC radar uses an encoding altimeter and a transponder operating with Mode C to determine an aircraft's altitude. Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A only or just a primary return. If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? In other words how does the radar know that the aircraft is actually 3 nm away laterally and not 4.25 nm (approx slant distance at that altitude)? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
I don't think that altitude from the ModeC is ever factored into where to
plot the target. The target was always slant range. BT "Jackie" wrote in message ... Jim Logajan wrote: Jackie wrote: If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? Without altitude information from the pilot or a Mode C transponder, the radar system can't extract the horizontal distance from the slant distance. Where did you read that their systems correct for altitude without Mode C transponders? If they could do that then they wouldn't have ever needed the transponders to report altitude. So if a pilot turns his Mode C from off to on, does the radar then correct the distance plotted (less distance from the antenna) based on the altitude reported? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
and that has nothing to do with Mode C accuracy
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:54:29 +0000 (UTC), Clark wrote: Jackie wrote in : [snip] Does precision approach radar require a transponder to report altitude? PAR uses a height finder radar to provide sufficient vertical resolution for precision approaches. Mode C only provides 100 foot altitude resolution. bzzzzt! Mode C provides a height eg 1252ft which is deemed only accurate to 100ft because the calibration errors are limited to 100ft. And when local BARO is not available, the minimums go up. And why the slop (calibration error) is taken into account when developing the approach procedure. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
reported altitude from a ModeC transponder is never used for vertical
guidance on a PAR approach. "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "Jackie" wrote in message ... Jim Logajan wrote: Jackie wrote: If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? Without altitude information from the pilot or a Mode C transponder, the radar system can't extract the horizontal distance from the slant distance. Where did you read that their systems correct for altitude without Mode C transponders? I don't believe I indicated I read this. If they could do that then they wouldn't have ever needed the transponders to report altitude. Does precision approach radar require a transponder to report altitude? At the altitudes involved during approach, it's not so critical (altitude is, but not the angle), but during approach the heading data is as critical as the altitude reporting. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
"Clark" wrote in message
... "Morgans" wrote in : "Bob Noel" wrote the elevation radar determines altitude the same way the azimuth radar determines bearing. There are actually two radars running for PAR, right? One sweeping left to right and one sweeping up and down, I think. As far as I know you are entirely correct. The installations I've seen (years ago and far away) have two independent radar systems, one for the horizontal and one for the vertical. Of course I've only seen ancient technology and I'm sure that these days it could be done with one steerable beam. Older PARs (which there are many still around) don't really have two independent systems. They basically separate the radar signal between two antenna (one for azimuth and one for elevation). Newer designs (which are still quite old) use a phase array which steers the beam. In both designs the transponder is neither required or used. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
ATC Radar Question
"Jackie" wrote in message
... I understand that ATC radar uses an encoding altimeter and a transponder operating with Mode C to determine an aircraft's altitude. Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A only or just a primary return. If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as a marker on the display)? In other words how does the radar know that the aircraft is actually 3 nm away laterally and not 4.25 nm (approx slant distance at that altitude)? It's pretty simple. The radiated energy from the transmitted pulse takes 12.36 microseconds to travel one mile and back. The radar uses that timing to determine range. No corrections for altitude are made. The system that receives transponder signals (which is an independent system which is correlated later) works exactly the same way. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
below the radar | Philip Stroh | Aviation Photos | 31 | November 27th 06 03:12 PM |
Integrating onboard weather radar data with satellite-fed Doppler radar | [email protected] | General Aviation | 3 | January 9th 05 08:57 PM |
Question about the F-22 and it's radar. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 128 | June 13th 04 01:23 AM |
Yet another "Radar Required" question. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 27th 04 05:07 PM |
F15E Radar question. | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 5 | August 30th 03 06:17 PM |