A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Level and a half



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old October 4th 05, 04:21 AM
Michael R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AIM 6-4-1

1. General. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each pilot who has two-way
radio communications failure when operating under IFR shall comply with the
rules of this section.

2. VFR conditions. If the failure occurs in VFR conditions, or if VFR
conditions are encountered after the failure, each pilot shall continue the
flight under VFR and land as soon as practicable.

NOTE-
This procedure also applies when two-way radio failure occurs while
operating in Class A airspace.




"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

So where in the FAR' is there authorization for VFR ops above FL180?


There isn't any. The FARs tend to prohibit things, not authorize them.
So where in the FARs is there prohibition of VFR ops above FL180?



So you're saying one could operate VFR at FL330?


Sure, as long as you're not in Class A airspace.



  #52  
Old October 4th 05, 05:37 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael R" wrote in message
...

AIM 6-4-1

1. General. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each pilot who has two-way
radio communications failure when operating under IFR shall comply with
the rules of this section.

2. VFR conditions. If the failure occurs in VFR conditions, or if VFR
conditions are encountered after the failure, each pilot shall continue
the flight under VFR and land as soon as practicable.

NOTE-
This procedure also applies when two-way radio failure occurs while
operating in Class A airspace.


Your point?


  #53  
Old October 5th 05, 01:38 AM
Michael R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That it is legal to fly VFR at FL335 in class A airspace. All you need is a
comm failure first.



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Michael R" wrote in message
...

AIM 6-4-1

1. General. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each pilot who has
two-way radio communications failure when operating under IFR shall
comply with the rules of this section.

2. VFR conditions. If the failure occurs in VFR conditions, or if VFR
conditions are encountered after the failure, each pilot shall continue
the flight under VFR and land as soon as practicable.

NOTE-
This procedure also applies when two-way radio failure occurs while
operating in Class A airspace.


Your point?



  #54  
Old October 5th 05, 01:50 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael R" wrote in message
...

That it is legal to fly VFR at FL335 in class A airspace. All you need is
a comm failure first.


The reference in AIM 6-4-1.c. that you quoted is to FAR 91.185, an
Instrument Flight Rule.


  #55  
Old October 5th 05, 02:10 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael R" wrote in message
...

That it is legal to fly VFR at FL335 in class A airspace. All you need is
a comm failure first.


The reference in AIM 6-4-1.c. that you quoted is to FAR 91.185, an
Instrument Flight Rule. The regulation says; "If the failure occurs in VFR
conditions, or if VFR conditions are encountered after the failure, each
pilot shall continue the flight under VFR and land as soon as practicable."
You can't just continue on VFR at FL 335. If you encounter a field where
it's practicable for you to land you must descend and land.


  #56  
Old October 5th 05, 02:30 AM
Michael R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The AIM continues:

However, it is not intended that the requirement to "land as soon as
practicable" be construed to mean "as soon as possible." Pilots retain the
prerogative of exercising their best judgment and are not required to land
at an unauthorized airport, at an airport unsuitable for the type of
aircraft flown, or to land only minutes short of their intended destination.

Sounds like I can continue on for 59 minutes and meet the letter of the AIM.


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Michael R" wrote in message
...

That it is legal to fly VFR at FL335 in class A airspace. All you need is
a comm failure first.


The reference in AIM 6-4-1.c. that you quoted is to FAR 91.185, an
Instrument Flight Rule. The regulation says; "If the failure occurs in
VFR conditions, or if VFR conditions are encountered after the failure,
each pilot shall continue the flight under VFR and land as soon as
practicable." You can't just continue on VFR at FL 335. If you encounter
a field where it's practicable for you to land you must descend and land.



  #57  
Old October 5th 05, 02:40 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael R" wrote in message
...

The AIM continues:

However, it is not intended that the requirement to "land as soon as
practicable" be construed to mean "as soon as possible." Pilots retain the
prerogative of exercising their best judgment and are not required to land
at an unauthorized airport, at an airport unsuitable for the type of
aircraft flown, or to land only minutes short of their intended
destination.

Sounds like I can continue on for 59 minutes and meet the letter of the
AIM.


How did you arrive at that conclusion? The AIM and the FARs are consistent,
if you encounter a field where it's practicable for you to land you must
descend and land. There is no time mentioned, if if you encounter VFR
conditions and a field where it's practicable for you to land you must
descend and land at that field.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.