If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"George Patterson" wrote in message news:vaNee.26$Ws6.6@trndny07... I rarely get an altimeter setting from a controller anyway. I make a point of picking up the setting from AWOS stations in flight and from ATIS before arrival or departure. As long as you tell the controller you have the ATIS, about the only time they'll give you the setting is as a gentle notice that you don't seem to be flying at the altitude at which you're supposed to be. Yup, if you choose not to talk to controllers you won't be getting altimeter settings from them. But if you fly IFR or use flight following you'll get an altimeter setting when you check in with a new controller. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"Happy Dog" wrote in message news Ask for the clearance. You're in violation without it. ATC should know better. Yeah, you're in violation of the letter of the law and ATC should know better. But the controller you're talking to is pretty much the only person that's in a position to file a violation, and controllers tend to dislike paperwork. Pressing the issue doesn't seem worth the frequency clutter to me. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. As I said in a previous post, I'm from Canada. You'd probably do well to make that distinction when you post. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll"
Ask for the clearance. You're in violation without it. ATC should know better. Yeah, you're in violation of the letter of the law and ATC should know better. But the controller you're talking to is pretty much the only person that's in a position to file a violation, and controllers tend to dislike paperwork. Pressing the issue doesn't seem worth the frequency clutter to me. I'm not normally paranoid, but I always ask for a stated clearance even when I'm sure the controller just forgot to say the words. I've asked for SVFR before and the controller missed it even though it was obvious I wanted it. The controller asked me to re-state the request. It was a very similar situation to what we're talking about. Something like: CXXX tower this is GXXX with information X GXXX, CXXX tower, go ahead GXXX is 7 nm NE, inbound landing, requesting SVFR please. GXXX, visibility is 3 miles, SVFR is required I understand and I've requested it. please repeat the request. CXXX tower, GXXX requests SVFR. SVFR granted. Call left base for runway XX. I think clearance procedures should be held to the highest standard. moo |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
As I said in a previous post, I'm from Canada. You'd probably do well to make that distinction when you post. Why? Is this an exclusively US NG? Is it assumed that people are posting from the USA unless they make it known otherwise? moo |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
"Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. Why? For clarity. Is this an exclusively US NG? Nope. Is it assumed that people are posting from the USA unless they make it known otherwise? Pretty much, yup. Especially when the quoted material in a message includes US publications as yours did. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Duniho wrote:
Looking back over the past several posts in this sub-thread, it certainly appears that there's a fair amount of mixed signals. Maybe someone should've read back a post or two. Agree. I overreacted. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Happy Dog wrote:
Tell us the procedure you use for VFR into NYC. I stay under it for the most part. The one time I had to go through was when they had that 1 mile TFR around the WTC site. I departed 3N6 to the north and called Kennedy approach as soon as I passed 1,000'. They told me to stay clear of the B and call Newark. I reached Newark approach over the Raritan bay and they gave me a vector and altitude with a further report point. No altimeter setting as I remember. Going into or over other controlled fields like Trenton, Knoxville, Roanoke, Raleigh, and Norfolk, I've never been given an altimeter setting when I told them I had the ATIS information. I've been into each of the first four fields quite a few times. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Happy Dog wrote:
Do you only talk to towers? Possible. But tricky in some places. Anyway, are you saying you almost always stay below Class Bravo? Yes, the only time I talk with controllers is when I am entering the airspace of a controlled field. When possible, I stay under or over class B airspace. I have gone through Newark once and Orlando once, but generally I avoid the Bs one way or another. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
"George Patterson" wrote in
Do you only talk to towers? Possible. But tricky in some places. Anyway, are you saying you almost always stay below Class Bravo? Yes, the only time I talk with controllers is when I am entering the airspace of a controlled field. When possible, I stay under or over class B airspace. I have gone through Newark once and Orlando once, but generally I avoid the Bs one way or another. OK. Then, FYI, expect an altimeter setting whenever you contact approach, departure, terminal or center. I guess I'm just used to almost always talking to some facility when I'm travelling. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |