If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
$300 homebrew wing levelling system
Bill Daniels wrote: I've been carefully watching the MEMS AHRS and IMU units for a while. The makers claim good performance but charge high prices. There is another way to achieve attitude sensing and that is multi-head GPS receivers that measure carrier phase difference between the antennas. If you combine MEMS AHRS with GPS attitude the two independent systems complement each other such that the AHRS provides "coast-through" attitude during GPS dropouts. It's not cheap but 0.1 degree resolution is possible. There is no question that your idea will work, and work VERY VERY well. NASA did some experiments and the results were WAY better than a conventional AI. Just not quite ready for the consumer market yet - price. But definitely has the potential to become a contender. BTW, ref: the idea of putting multiple units in a "tell me thrice" configuration. That would help, but except for the benefit of redundancy, doesn't gain as much as one would think. They all tend to suffer similar problems. What we did do, which helped quite a bit, was characterize the units over temperature. Although the variation between units is significant (hence the benefits you noted), and the change with temperature is DRASTIC, for any individual unit the change with temperature tends to be quite repeatable. This allows you to temperature compensate the unit with a response curve fit in software. BIG help. Still leaves the inability to differentiate slow drift from a slight deviation from level (or straight). But then a conventional AH (electric or vacuum) has he same problem. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
$300 homebrew wing levelling system
jmk wrote: Morgans wrote: wrote This simple system could be put together for under $300. Any thoughts on how it might work? Sounds like you are on the right track. One thing I would think about adding, is a way to automatically correct for the rate gyro's drift. Worst case for most of those RC gyros (designed for RC helicopters, etc.) is about 3 degrees per second. Most of our airplanes will naturally STAY level better than that. Better gyros are available, of course, but the price goes up... A good Crossbow 3-axis gyro is $3K or above. A $30 analog devices mems gyro drift is about 70 degrees/hour with temperature calibration, straight out the box they are pretty lousy (and I think Crossbow uses the analog devices chips but calibrates the crap out of them). RC helicopters use the older style piezo gyro's. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training | Immanuel Goldstein | Piloting | 365 | March 16th 06 01:15 AM |
A New Air Traffic Control System On The Horizon | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | June 17th 05 03:03 PM |
Air Force Helper 2000 | tomcat | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 9th 04 11:54 PM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |