If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Great circle formulae, True cource and actual heading
Hi,
I am trying to write a formula to compute flight headings. If i use 2 lat/lon i can get a "true course" but due to magnetic variations the true course is not really all that useful, (knowing that my true course is 118deg will not tell me that i should fly 93 deg). What i mean is if i go from A to B i can calculate the True course, ('tc') but my actual heading varies a lot depending on my position along the course. Is there a reliable formula to calculate my actual heading at a certain point along the course? Many thanks in advance. Sims |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Sims" wrote in
: Hi, I am trying to write a formula to compute flight headings. If i use 2 lat/lon i can get a "true course" but due to magnetic variations the true course is not really all that useful, (knowing that my true course is 118deg will not tell me that i should fly 93 deg). What i mean is if i go from A to B i can calculate the True course, ('tc') but my actual heading varies a lot depending on my position along the course. Is there a reliable formula to calculate my actual heading at a certain point along the course? Many thanks in advance. Sims At least in sci.geo.satellite-nav this sort of question about formulae has been asked numerous times, including quite recent threads, so a search via Google Groups would likely have already found you your answer. Take a look at Ed Williams page about Aviation Formulary: http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm -- Dave Patton Canadian Coordinator, the Degree Confluence Project http://www.confluence.org dpatton at confluence dot org My website: http://members.shaw.ca/davepatton/ Vancouver/Whistler - host of the 2010 Winter Olympics |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sims wrote: Hi, I am trying to write a formula to compute flight headings. If i use 2 lat/lon i can get a "true course" but due to magnetic variations the true course is not really all that useful, (knowing that my true course is 118deg will not tell me that i should fly 93 deg). What i mean is if i go from A to B i can calculate the True course, ('tc') but my actual heading varies a lot depending on my position along the course. Is there a reliable formula to calculate my actual heading at a certain point along the course? Many thanks in advance. Sims You mean your magnetic heading. You have your actual heading. You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. Dale -- _ _ Dale DePriest /`) _ // http://users.cwnet.com/dalede o/_/ (_(_X_(` For GPS and GPS/PDAs |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dale DePriest wrote:
You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. Given a table of magnetic variations at known locations, there are statistical methods to derive a useful mathematical model. The web site cited in a previous article provides such a model as a polynomial. http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm#Var |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Craig Prouse wrote: Dale DePriest wrote: You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. Given a table of magnetic variations at known locations, there are statistical methods to derive a useful mathematical model. The web site cited in a previous article provides such a model as a polynomial. http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm#Var http://geomag.usgs.gov/chartsdo.html http://geomag.usgs.gov/models.html http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/wg8/igrf.html http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/wg8/table1.txt http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/magcalc.shtml http://www.garmin.com/manuals/GPSIII...nersManual.pdf page 78 (in document) (page 88 in pdf file) gives 4 heading adjustment choices: auto magnetic (using a magnetic field model driven by the current location), true, grid (driven the UTM locatin) or user magnetic (the user states the desired adjustment). I suppose that you could use this to include a wind adjustment?! Other than that; get your aviation weather report and your E6B. Randolph J. Herber, , +1 630 840 2966, CD/CDFTF PK-149F, Mail Stop 318, Fermilab, Kirk & Pine Rds., PO Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510-0500, USA. (Speaking for myself and not for US, US DOE, FNAL nor URA.) (Product, trade, or service marks herein belong to their respective owners.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Dale DePriest" wrote in message You mean your magnetic heading. You have your actual heading. You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. I found the post a little confusing because it seemed to be mixing the problem of the course heading changing due to the great circle route (mentioned in the subject) with heading changes due to changing declination mentioned in the body. Two very different issues. Steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
red rover wrote: "Dale DePriest" wrote in message You mean your magnetic heading. You have your actual heading. You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. I found the post a little confusing because it seemed to be mixing the problem of the course heading changing due to the great circle route (mentioned in the subject) with heading changes due to changing declination mentioned in the body. Two very different issues. Steve Yes, it was my mistake, I misread the original post by not comparing the text to the subject line. I tried to cancel but too late, Sorry Dale -- _ _ Dale DePriest /`) _ // http://users.cwnet.com/dalede o/_/ (_(_X_(` For GPS and GPS/PDAs |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dale DePriest" wrote in message
... Yes, it was my mistake, I misread the original post by not comparing the text to the subject line. I tried to cancel but too late, Sorry Dale Well I actually meant the original post was confusing, not your reply. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"red rover" wrote in message .. . "Dale DePriest" wrote in message You mean your magnetic heading. You have your actual heading. You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. (Sorry to reply here your post was cancelled). Yes i do mean the magnetic heading. Sorry I was not clear. Where can i get a table to compute my magnetic heading? Thanks Sims. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sims wrote: "red rover" wrote in message .. . "Dale DePriest" wrote in message You mean your magnetic heading. You have your actual heading. You need a table of magnetic variations and interprolate from the table based on your location as there is no mathmatical model that will provide this information reliably. (Sorry to reply here your post was cancelled). Yes i do mean the magnetic heading. Sorry I was not clear. Where can i get a table to compute my magnetic heading? Try here for a start. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/WMM/DoDWMM.shtml Dale Thanks Sims. -- _ _ Dale DePriest /`) _ // http://users.cwnet.com/dalede o/_/ (_(_X_(` For GPS and GPS/PDAs |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|