A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NEW BUYER PLEASE HELP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 18th 03, 05:20 AM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NEW BUYER PLEASE HELP

I have narrowed my choices down to two. A CESSNA 210, 1960, 3895 TT, 377
SMOH , Dual Mk12d, IFR, Modern Panel, Great Paint, Good interior &
glass, NDH, Fresh Annual for 60,000. Continental IO-470-E. 377 SMOH. 260
Hp. Fuel Injected.

And a 1964 Comanche 250, 3500TT, 400 SMOH, IFR, Duel KX155,
Autopilot(old one), Fresh Annual, NDH, needs paint and interior.

What would everyones choice be on the two airplanes. This is going to be
my first buy. Any ifo on the 210 would help. Anyone fly a 1960 210?
ANYTHING WOULD HELP

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
  #2  
Old July 18th 03, 05:52 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Tony wrote)
snip
And a 1964 Comanche 250, 3500TT, 400 SMOH, IFR, Duel KX155,
Autopilot(old one), Fresh Annual, NDH, needs paint and interior.


http://www.jrd.org/n8962p/ics/The%20...he%20Story.htm
Good Comanche site.

--
Montblack


  #3  
Old July 18th 03, 06:56 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On 17-Jul-2003, Ryan Ferguson wrote:

On the other hand, of course, if heavy hauling is your game, the
210 is a great pickup truck. They're nice airplanes too.


IIRC the 1960 C-210 was basically a retractable C-182. It wasn't until a
few years later that the useful load was increased substantially, along with
a 300 hp engine. Those early C-210s are also noted for having
maintenance-intensive gear systems.

If you are attracted to these old birds by their relatively low purchase
price, remember that the maintenance costs as a fraction of acquisition cost
will be high, possibly VERY high.

-Elliott Drucker
  #4  
Old July 21st 03, 12:53 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tony wrote:

I have narrowed my choices down to two. A CESSNA 210, 1960, 3895 TT, 377
SMOH , Dual Mk12d, IFR, Modern Panel, Great Paint, Good interior &
glass, NDH, Fresh Annual for 60,000. Continental IO-470-E. 377 SMOH. 260
Hp. Fuel Injected.

And a 1964 Comanche 250, 3500TT, 400 SMOH, IFR, Duel KX155,
Autopilot(old one), Fresh Annual, NDH, needs paint and interior.

What would everyones choice be on the two airplanes. This is going to be
my first buy. Any ifo on the 210 would help. Anyone fly a 1960 210?
ANYTHING WOULD HELP


I know a guy just like you. Bought the same 210 for his first plane.
You cannot believe how big a ****box an old 210 can be. Plus, they are
slow. He put $12K just into the gear in three years. Get yourself a
182 with a big motor and go the same speed for a hell of a lot less money.

  #5  
Old July 21st 03, 01:26 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Comanche 250.. no contest..

(IMHO)

Dave


On 18 Jul 2003 04:20:02 GMT, Tony wrote:

I have narrowed my choices down to two. A CESSNA 210, 1960, 3895 TT, 377
SMOH , Dual Mk12d, IFR, Modern Panel, Great Paint, Good interior &
glass, NDH, Fresh Annual for 60,000. Continental IO-470-E. 377 SMOH. 260
Hp. Fuel Injected.

And a 1964 Comanche 250, 3500TT, 400 SMOH, IFR, Duel KX155,
Autopilot(old one), Fresh Annual, NDH, needs paint and interior.

What would everyones choice be on the two airplanes. This is going to be
my first buy. Any ifo on the 210 would help. Anyone fly a 1960 210?
ANYTHING WOULD HELP

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.


  #6  
Old July 21st 03, 02:08 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Comanche 250.. no contest..

Agree 100%.

A Comanche is a sweet plane...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #8  
Old July 21st 03, 11:10 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tony wrote:

What would everyones choice be on the two airplanes.


I'd go for the Comanche.

George Patterson
The optimist feels that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist is afraid that he's correct.
James Branch Cavel
  #9  
Old July 23rd 03, 05:58 AM
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank you all for the post. WE ARE GOING TO GET THE COMANCHE ON MONDAY
thanks again Tony

*** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com ***
Add a newsgroup interface to your website today.
  #10  
Old July 24th 03, 03:07 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank you all for the post. WE ARE GOING TO GET THE COMANCHE ON MONDAY
thanks again Tony


Good luck!

And we will expect to see pictures of your new "baby" soon!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 93 December 20th 04 02:17 PM
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 8 July 8th 04 07:01 AM
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! Bill Berle Home Built 73 June 25th 04 04:53 AM
Article: GPS Vehicle Tracking System Issues for the Buyer Johann Blake Military Aviation 0 January 16th 04 11:26 AM
Kenny's Exposed Lies Got His Panties in a Wad Larry Smith Home Built 13 October 23rd 03 10:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.