If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Rasimus wrote in message . ..
On 18 Jul 2004 22:40:58 -0700, (Fred the Red Shirt) wrote: (B2431) wrote in message ... The fact remains kerry accused us of all being involved with or have knowledge of war crimes. I disagree. That is a gross distortion of the facts, just like the way neocons used Sherman's words form a protion of one of his letters to 'prove' that he had confessed to war crimes. ... If what he said was true he had an obligation to take it public. He not ONCE said the majority of vets served honourably. Perhaps someone should point that out to him and ask him to address that. Somehow I don't think it would satisfy you if he did, even if he had done so back then. What Kerry said was clearly figurative speech, just like when I say we Americans are responsible for the wrongdoing that America does anywhere in the world today? Here's what Kerry said (again!) on Meet the Press: "There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals." -- John Kerry, on NBC's "Meet the Press" April 18, 1971 Does that sound allegorical or less than a literal admission of war crimes? No, this time you picked out a quote wherein Kerry referred to specific activities. Read again: "I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers" NOWHERE in the paragraph you just quoted doe he accuse you of all being involved with or have knowledge of war crimes. I'm not sure if I should question your competency or your honesty but something is not right. I've once gone through the litany and challenged that free fire zones, harrassment, interdiction, .50 cal, search-and-destroy, air raids, etc are NOT in any way violations of the Geneva Convention. And I addressed those issue in this thread where you or someone else discussed them. So could you pick it up there, if you wish to continue? I challenged Kerry's assertion regarding .50 cal as "our only weapon against people" comparing it to his narrative of one of his BS awards indicating he had an M-16 which jammed so he picked up another M-16 in the boat. The sentence is pretty awkward. I think one could honestly parse it as 'there were times when conducting harrassment and interdiction fire that the 50 cal was the only weapon we used.' 'were our only weapon' by itself is of course literally as well as gramatically incorrect. 'We' (America) literally had tanks and aircraft and all sorts of other weapons. Heck, we had nuclear weapons too, just not in Vietnam. Do you suppose that, given the sentence is both ungrammatical and blindingly obviously literally incorrect he might have mispoken? Just because he doesn't talk like Bush doesn't mean he never screws up. Did I just stab you in the back? And here's from Kerry's Senate testimony (under oath): "I would like to talk on behalf of all those veterans and say that several months ago in Detroit we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia. These were not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit - the emotions in the room and the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do. And here where he does use 'all' he is clearly speaking generally. They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, And here, of course, he is clearly referring to specific anecdotes. and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country." And here of course, he is speaking generally again. Now Mr Rasimus, I gather from your writing that you are a literate man of at least moderate intelligence. You have indicated that you are older than myself, that you work for the Smithsonian and you read the Washington Times. Few people outside of the DC area (and not a whole lot there either) read the Times so I figure you live in the DC area. I would guess that over the years you have heard at least as much Senate 'testimony' as I have. You must have listened on one or more occasion when people 'testified' by reading prepared speeches and were then 'questioned' by Senators whose questions were themselves also speeches. So please, don't expect me to believe that you hope that when someone testifies befor the Senate they are speaking literally. You know better. Don't expect me to believe that you cannot tell when a speaker shifts between general statements to specific anecdotes and back again. You're smart enough, and you're experienced enough. It is odd that you do not seem to have expected others in the newsgroup to be similarly endowed with those attributes. It certainly sounds like LITERAL testimony. Of course, the fact that his "150 honorably discharged....etc" veterans turned out to not be so makes it questionable, but let's give John the benefit of the doubt that he didn't know it at the time. I appreciate that last sentence was written in an effort to be fair. But I still ask you to show some evidence that the 'testimony' of the 'Winter Soldiers' was debunked. Lots of people make that claim. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |