If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 09 May 2005 16:40:19 -0700, Antoņio
wrote in :: Larry Dighera wrote: Just because you can't see 'em, doesn't mean they're not there. Are you saying you believe in ghosts? ;-) I believe it's difficult to discern all the aircraft in the vicinity if there is haze or they're against a busy landscape. They are tangible ghosts that can quite surprisingly appear to materialize suddenly due to high closing speeds, and be startlingly close at times. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
George Patterson wrote:
And it's not a disorder to prefer to be doing something else than concentrating on listening for your N-number in the static and other conversation. Unfortunately, the phemomena I was speaking of is called "Attention Deficit *Disorder* ". I hope you realize that I meant no disrespect. Antonio |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Morgans wrote:
What was that? I was reading it, but I lost track of it somewhere. Who were you talking to, anyway? ;-) Ha! ....obviously MYSELF ! Remember that old saying; "No good deed goes unpunished"? Antonio |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Antoņio wrote:
Unfortunately, the phemomena I was speaking of is called "Attention Deficit *Disorder* ". I hope you realize that I meant no disrespect. Oh, I realize that. I was simply assuring you that I have been spared that particular problem. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Antoņio" wrote in message ... Oh dear! Let me just say for myself that I don't consider this an exclusive US newsgroup no matter what the inclusions or exclusions. You're free to consider it anything you like. Such repartee ! Oh, and by the way, I am a US citizen posting from the USA so the context of my replies will be within that framework. I quote: Happy dog: "Is it assumed that people are posting from the USA unless they make it known otherwise?" Steven's categorical reply: "Pretty much, yup... " Such an assuption is, at best, borderline arrogance. Antonio Antonio |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
"Antoņio" wrote in message ... Such repartee ! Oh, and by the way, I am a US citizen posting from the USA so the context of my replies will be within that framework. I quote: Happy dog: "Is it assumed that people are posting from the USA unless they make it known otherwise?" Steven's categorical reply: "Pretty much, yup... " Such an assuption is, at best, borderline arrogance. Actually, it's just an observed fact. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 09 May 2005 06:52:59 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote: On Sun, 8 May 2005 21:42:33 -0500, A Lieberman wrote in :: If so, I would be required to read back??? There is no FAA regulation *requiring* reed back of a clearance. Subsequent to 'rogering' your clearance, you may detect a bit of consternation in the controller's voice if you are in contact with her, but that's about it. I guess a lot depends on the airport/Center area you are flying from. In meetings with our local ATC, they advise us to readback all clearances, hold short, taxi, and runway assignments. The best reason I have for reading back clearances is, if anything goes wrong, my voice is on the tape repeating the controllers instructions and getting "readback correct" in return. CYA if you have to file an ASRS form. Ron |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
. net... The fact is you misread Hamish's post and your ego won't let you admit it. Whether I did or not is irrelevant to the fact that you misread MY post. |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... Whether I did or not is irrelevant to the fact that you misread MY post. But I didn't misread YOUR post. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
OP wrote:
The best reason I have for reading back clearances is, if anything goes wrong, my voice is on the tape repeating the controllers instructions and getting "readback correct" in return. CYA if you have to file an ASRS form. Failure for ATC to correct your incorrect readback does not absolve you of responsibilty to comply with the original instruction. This was once touted to be the case, but the FAA stompted on that idea. Your last sentence makes no sense. You don't need any CYA for filing ASRS. You can file an ASRS at any time you think you have a contribution to the safety process. The ASRS itself is a CYA for some enforcement actions, but it's primary purpose is not a way for pilots to avoid FAA persecution. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |