A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stretching WW2 Designs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old September 1st 04, 10:29 AM
Dave Eadsforth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Eunometic
writes
Presidente Alcazar wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:17:41 -0400, (Peter
Stickney) wrote:

Before the 2 stage Merlin appeared, The folks planning Brit War
Production were getting ready to close down Merlin production in favor
of its intended followons - the Sabre and the Vulture. (The Griffon
was another Rolls private venture) It's a good thig that didn't
happen.


Whatever do you mean? Surely the war would have ended a lot sooner
with fleets of Sabre-engined Lancasters darkening the skies and the
emergency runways at Manston and Woodbridge after multiple engine
failures?

Gavin Bailey



There was no problems in the sleeve valved Napier Sabre that hadn't
already been solved by Bristol in its succesfull sleave valve
radials. In fact the Napiers problems were solved with Bristols
help.

Napier did eventually accept Bristol assistance over the manufacture of
the sleeves (and the US milling machines that made it possible) - but
only after MAP told 'em to...

And the tendency for the Sabre's pistons to melt a bit was only overcome
by adding oil to the priming tank.

Apart from that - bloody good mill!

The Vulture was simply 'developed to death' to provide increasing
power for the over specification weight Manchester.

The same fate befell the Junkers Jumo 222 which underwent 2 bore and 1
stroke change to increase power to keep up with airframe size weight
increases. As a result the engine was pushed to a new limit just as
the last set of teething problems had barely adaquetly been solved.


Cheers,

Dave

--
Dave Eadsforth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Andreasson designs Bob Babcock Home Built 5 March 4th 04 09:15 PM
Boeing's WW 2 Disc Designs robert arndt Military Aviation 6 February 23rd 04 05:59 AM
Performance Designs 60 x 66 wood prop Sam Hoskins Aviation Marketplace 0 December 10th 03 01:22 AM
Marine team designs and flies homemade, muscle-powered plane Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 26th 03 12:41 AM
Why are delta wing designs reputed to lose speed during turns? Air Force Jayhawk Military Aviation 2 September 25th 03 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.