A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

socalled ''progress''



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st 11, 10:09 PM posted to md.personals,misc.transport.road,rec.aviation.owning,rec.food.cooking,aus.computers
Peter Lucas[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default socalled ''progress''

Im not sexist but the average aussie soldier carrys about 30
Kilogrammes of gear on them. they also have to be able to run 5
kilometers in less then 20 minutes. Do you REALLY think an average
woman can do that? Also in hand to hand combat who would have a
realistic advantage? A male soldier, or a female ''soldier''? Also I
doubt that a frikken woman would be able to carry a wounded person
(AND probabley 10 kilgrammes of beuty products too boot! ;-)). The
primitive instinct of ''chivalry'' that men have will also cause them
to be distracted and more ''protective'' of female soldiers. This
effects the nations security directly- is some more stupid ''PC''
really worth sacraficing that?!?

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
sticking it to ''Politcal Correctness'' since 2008
Ads
  #2  
Old February 1st 11, 02:31 AM posted to md.personals,misc.transport.road,rec.aviation.owning,rec.food.cooking,aus.computers
SG1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default socalled ''progress''


"Peter Lucas" wrote in
message
...
Im not sexist but the average aussie soldier carrys about 30
Kilogrammes of gear on them. they also have to be able to run 5
kilometers in less then 20 minutes. Do you REALLY think an average
woman can do that? Also in hand to hand combat who would have a
realistic advantage? A male soldier, or a female ''soldier''? Also I
doubt that a frikken woman would be able to carry a wounded person
(AND probabley 10 kilgrammes of beuty products too boot! ;-)). The
primitive instinct of ''chivalry'' that men have will also cause them
to be distracted and more ''protective'' of female soldiers. This
effects the nations security directly- is some more stupid ''PC''
really worth sacraficing that?!?

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
sticking it to ''Politcal Correctness'' since 2008


Hey retard during sex the average women supports an 80kg man, your 30kg pack
is nothing in comparison.....


  #3  
Old February 1st 11, 02:37 AM posted to md.personals,misc.transport.road,rec.aviation.owning,rec.food.cooking,aus.computers
Reality Check
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default socalled ''progress''


"SG1" wrote in message
...

"Peter Lucas" wrote
in message
...


bitch slap

Hey retard during sex the average women supports an 80kg man, your
30kg pack is nothing in comparison.....


I doubt that a fairy like, "peter lucas," would know anything about
sex.

Except sex with Mr. Hand, of course.

RC


  #4  
Old February 1st 11, 10:07 AM posted to md.personals,misc.transport.road,rec.aviation.owning,rec.food.cooking,aus.computers
NBtarheel_33
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default socalled ''progress''

On Jan 31, 4:09*pm, Peter Lucas
wrote:
Im not sexist but the average aussie soldier carrys about 30
Kilogrammes of gear on them. they also have to be able to run 5
kilometers in less then 20 minutes. Do you REALLY think an average
woman can do that? Also in hand to hand combat who would have a
realistic advantage? A male soldier, or a female ''soldier''? Also I
doubt that a frikken woman would be able to carry a wounded person
(AND probabley 10 kilgrammes of beuty products too boot! ;-)). The
primitive instinct of ''chivalry'' that men have will also cause them
to be distracted and more ''protective'' of female soldiers. This
effects the nations security directly- is some more stupid ''PC''
really worth sacraficing that?!?

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
sticking it to ''Politcal Correctness'' since 2008


Please explain how there can ever be a scintilla of sensibility in
simultaneously posting a single item to a dating group, a road
transportation group, an aviation owners group, a cooking group, and
an Australian computing group.

Unless the owner of a Cessna 172 was looking for love whilst waiting
in line at VicRoads, and was so incensed by the clerk's charms that he
knocked over the cup of instant noodles he was preparing, dousing the
clerk's computer, rendering it inoperable.

Yeah, I guess it could happen...in the world of a Usenet kook.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Progress Gaetan Trudel Soaring 19 September 21st 10 07:24 PM
Accidents in progress Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 1 April 30th 07 03:27 PM
Lighthawk Progress? [email protected] Soaring 0 December 21st 03 12:00 AM
Progress on Flying Car Steve Dufour General Aviation 5 December 19th 03 04:48 PM
A380 Progress robert arndt Military Aviation 4 November 4th 03 12:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.