A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Direct to intermediate approach fix?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 17th 06, 11:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?


"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...
The likely reason the controller used the procedure for the ILS is
because controllers have a way of bending the rules to suit their
personal perception of things.


What rules are you referring to?


7110.65P 4-8-1 b. 4


So what's the problem with controllers bending the rules to suit their
personal perception of things? After all, 7110.65 is an FAA order and FAA
orders are just guidance. Isn't that correct?


  #22  
Old December 18th 06, 12:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

The likely reason the controller used the procedure for the ILS is
because controllers have a way of bending the rules to suit their
personal perception of things.


What rules are you referring to?


7110.65P 4-8-1 b. 4



So what's the problem with controllers bending the rules to suit their
personal perception of things? After all, 7110.65 is an FAA order and FAA
orders are just guidance. Isn't that correct?


No, that is not correct.
  #23  
Old December 18th 06, 12:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?


"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

No, that is not correct.


What caused you to change your mind?


  #24  
Old December 18th 06, 12:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

No, that is not correct.



What caused you to change your mind?


An order sets forth directives from the Adminstrator or her designees.

Where the order sets fortt mandatory actions or limitations, it means
just that. Where it gives several methods of compliance, it means just
that. Where it provides optional procedures, it means just that. Where
it instructs employees to be familiar with an order that applies to the
services they provide, it means just that.
  #25  
Old December 18th 06, 10:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?


"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

An order sets forth directives from the Adminstrator or her designees.

Where the order sets fortt mandatory actions or limitations, it means just
that. Where it gives several methods of compliance, it means just that.
Where it provides optional procedures, it means just that. Where it
instructs employees to be familiar with an order that applies to the
services they provide, it means just that.


Yes, I know, but three months ago you took the position that FAA orders are
guidance. What caused you to change your mind?


  #26  
Old December 18th 06, 01:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

An order sets forth directives from the Adminstrator or her designees.

Where the order sets fortt mandatory actions or limitations, it means just
that. Where it gives several methods of compliance, it means just that.
Where it provides optional procedures, it means just that. Where it
instructs employees to be familiar with an order that applies to the
services they provide, it means just that.



Yes, I know, but three months ago you took the position that FAA orders are
guidance. What caused you to change your mind?


I didn't.
  #27  
Old December 18th 06, 11:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?


"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

I didn't.


Which do you believe you didn't do? Take the position that FAA orders are
guidance or change your mind?


  #28  
Old December 19th 06, 12:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

I didn't.



Which do you believe you didn't do? Take the position that FAA orders are
guidance or change your mind?



Oh, orders are indeed guidance. Guidance does not always mean guidelines.

I quote Order 8260.19C, Paragraph 100:

"This order provides guidance to all FAA personnel for the
administration and accomplishment of the FAA Flight Procedures and
Airspace Program."

Or, Order 7100.9:

"1. Purpose. This order provides guidance and standardization for
procedures development and management of the Standard Terminal Arrival
(STAR) Program."
  #29  
Old December 19th 06, 01:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?


"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

Oh, orders are indeed guidance. Guidance does not always mean guidelines.

I quote Order 8260.19C, Paragraph 100:

"This order provides guidance to all FAA personnel for the administration
and accomplishment of the FAA Flight Procedures and Airspace Program."

Or, Order 7100.9:

"1. Purpose. This order provides guidance and standardization for
procedures development and management of the Standard Terminal Arrival
(STAR) Program."


l.rr.com



  #30  
Old December 19th 06, 11:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Direct to intermediate approach fix?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Sam Spade" wrote in message
...

Oh, orders are indeed guidance. Guidance does not always mean guidelines.

I quote Order 8260.19C, Paragraph 100:

"This order provides guidance to all FAA personnel for the administration
and accomplishment of the FAA Flight Procedures and Airspace Program."

Or, Order 7100.9:

"1. Purpose. This order provides guidance and standardization for
procedures development and management of the Standard Terminal Arrival
(STAR) Program."



l.rr.com



I repeat myself:


Where the order sets fortt mandatory actions or limitations, it means
just that. Where it gives several methods of compliance, it means just
that. Where it provides optional procedures, it means just that. Where
it instructs employees to be familiar with an order that applies to the
services they provide, it means just that.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? Andrew Gideon Instrument Flight Rules 29 February 14th 04 02:51 AM
Study pilot workload during approach and landing Freshfighter Piloting 5 December 7th 03 04:06 PM
IR checkride story! Guy Elden Jr. Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 1st 03 09:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.