KCHD to KMYF

writes:

Why not be honest rather then lie? You don't have a 152.

But I do. It's one of many aircraft I have on the sim.

You have MSFS with a 152 add on.

Yes, same thing.

First sentence if you were truthful would read My MSFS 152 has no
autopilot.

Same thing.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

So do you at least use real, printed to the proper scale, TAC's, Sectionals,
and WAC's?

I look at them online. They are direct scans from paper, right down to the
halftone screens.

Looking at a not-to-scale scan of a chart on a computer screen is not
preparing a flight plan by any stretch of the imagination.

Go to http://www.dauntless-soft.com/produc...FlightPlanner/ and
will find 3 versions of a flight planner form in PDF.

Download any version you want and print it out.

Once you have filled one completely out, you have prepared a flight plan.

And if you did us a flight planner, you would understand why your babbling
about looking up navaid frequencies is babble.

Nothing obligates me to use a flight planner. Pilots have been flying for a
hundred years without one.

No one said anything about you being obligated to use a flight planner,
and no one is.

What was said is that if you did, you would understand why your babbling
about looking up navaid frequencies is babble.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 7, 3:47*pm, george wrote:

You're asking mixedup to make an honest statement ?
Good luck

This is the root of the problem. He is lying by saying he flies a 152
and now getting called out to carpet and not admitting to it. Yep,
major disconnect from reality.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

So you don't know anything about flight planning apparently and not
qualified to give pilots advice on routing are you?

I have no idea how you reached this conclusion, so I cannot comment.

Because it is obvious you have never done any real flight planning in
your life.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

And yet you go on and on about how you feel it is important to fly "safe"
while playing with your simulation...

Yes, safety is an important part of simulation for me.

Yet you short cut the first, and one of the most important, tasks you must do
to fly.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On May 7, 4:09*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

It's real, just not typical.

WRONG WRONG and WRONG.

YOU SAID

No, I resort to airway because that's how aircraft are flown in real life..

I provided proof that you are WRONG.

I again fly in the real world. WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE IN THE REAL
WORLD????????????????????????

LET ME GUESS YOU WON'T ANSWER THE DIRECT QUESTION AS USUAL.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

And yet you go on and on about how "safe" a pilot you are and how you would
never do anythin "unsafe" while playing your game.

Single-pilot IFR is sometimes merely illegal rather than demonstrably unsafe.
And in any case, if I can fly successfully single-pilot in simulation, I can
certainly fly successfully with a copilot in real life.

Flying solo in an aircraft that requires a crew is unsafe.

Flying anything without doing complete flight planning is unsafe.

And both are illegal.

Yet you go on and on about how "safe" a pilot you are and how you would
never do anythin "unsafe" while playing your game and that your game is
just like the real thing.

You are delusional.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

If you really took it seriously you would put the same effort a real pilot
does in flight planning and not "fly" airplanes that require a crew solo.

Sometimes I do put real effort into flight planning ...

That would be impossible as you have already said you don't use a flight
planner and you don't have to scale printed charts.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

No one said anything about "specially certified sources".

If you don't use certified sources, you could be violating the FARs.

Gibbering nonsense that just shows again you haven't a clue about how to
do real flight planning.

You've raved on and on time and again about how "safe" you are; "safer"
than real pilots.

Safer than _some_ real pilots, of that I have absolutely no doubt.

You've raved on and on time and again about how "safe" you are; "safer"
than real pilots who really do flight planning.

Yet your flight planning is "good enough".

You match the planning to the objectives.

If the objective is to play a game, then indeed you need not do any flight
planning.

If the objective is to really simulate flying, then you need to do the
same flight planning you would do for real flight.

So your objective is obviously to play a game.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

WRONG. WRONG WRONG.

Writing in uppercase doesn't make you right.

Don't believe me, look up what used to be my tail number N1943L. You
don't get any real then that.

It's real, just not typical. Most pilots know about other types of navigation
besides Direct-To.

The choices are not just airways or direct to.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.