If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"James M. Knox" wrote:
The AI provides the "wing leveler" primary input, while the DG and NAV signals are summed to provide a heading. Amazingly effective, for such a trivial analog approach, it will (if carefully adjusted) intercept and track a NAV signal. However, in a strong crosswind, it will do so "off" the actual courseline (parallel to it). Not quite parallel, but rather with a constant CDI offset, which for VOR and LOC signals means a constant angular displacement. 2. Like all such systems, there is no turn anticipation. I've never let the Century AP's fly anything but the most shallow turns. I generally disengage the AP approaching the fix, hand-fly the turn, then give the stick back to Otto for the next straight segment. In fact, most of the time I just leave it in heading mode. a) too little, and it will fly S-turns about the desired course line, and b) too much, and it will wing rock itself until you toss your cookies. Getting it set "just right" is an inflight specific adjustment unique to each individual autopilot unit and N# combo. I once flew a plane that had a *way* underdamped roll-rate. If you reset the heading bug, it would slam you into a turn, hold that until it was right up to the desired heading, then slam the wings back level. IIRC, it didn't use excessive bank angles, just excessive roll rates in and out of the turns. Not fun. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Smith wrote in
: "James M. Knox" wrote: The AI provides the "wing leveler" primary input, while the DG and NAV signals are summed to provide a heading. Amazingly effective, for such a trivial analog approach, it will (if carefully adjusted) intercept and track a NAV signal. However, in a strong crosswind, it will do so "off" the actual courseline (parallel to it). Not quite parallel, but rather with a constant CDI offset, which for VOR and LOC signals means a constant angular displacement. Good point... It's a constant voltage offset. I beleive one of the Century (or old Mitchell) manuals actually uses the word parallel, but you are right - it's a constant degree offset, only parallel for following something like a GPS courseline. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Roy Smith
writes: 2. Like all such systems, there is no turn anticipation. I've never let the Century AP's fly anything but the most shallow turns. I generally disengage the AP approaching the fix, hand-fly the turn, then give the stick back to Otto for the next straight segment. In fact, most of the time I just leave it in heading mode. Not so. My Garmin 430 when coupled to the Century will anticipate, tho with the Archer speed,that is not much. I generally let the autopilot do the turn. At the turn I turn the heading but to the new course and let the 430 trim it out. If the heading change is large, I sometimes do this in two steps of half value each. Chuck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |