A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ID anyone? - 1 attachment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 11, 06:29 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Justin Case[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment



Just wonderin' if anyone had an idea *when* this might
have been taken... Craft ID would be nice too, since I
dunno much about Brit stuff :-)




Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	unknown.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	35.7 KB
ID:	47912  
  #2  
Old April 21st 11, 06:46 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 477
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

On 2011-04-20 22:29:50 -0700, Justin Case said:

Just wonderin' if anyone had an idea *when* this might
have been taken... Craft ID would be nice too, since I
dunno much about Brit stuff :-)


image


It looks all Buccaneer S2 to me.
http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/de...ma_72177_p.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #3  
Old April 21st 11, 05:43 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Justin Case[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

"Dave Kearton" wrote in
:


You should really try Googling first, a truckload of fascinating info
in this particular airframe - after 30 seconds work.



Sorry, but there's not a lot of info showing up in
this photo to translate into a google search.

I am qualified to note these keywords:

Jet aircraft, possibly British
black & white photo
multiple wing-fired rockets
clouds

Those helped with a return of over 90k hits.

  #4  
Old April 21st 11, 07:10 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Frogdog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

On 21 Apr 2011 16:43:39 GMT, Justin Case wrote:

"Dave Kearton" wrote in
:


You should really try Googling first, a truckload of fascinating info
in this particular airframe - after 30 seconds work.



Sorry, but there's not a lot of info showing up in
this photo to translate into a google search.

I am qualified to note these keywords:

Jet aircraft, possibly British
black & white photo
multiple wing-fired rockets
clouds

Those helped with a return of over 90k hits.



I ran a search for "buccaneer XN981" (that appears to be the obvious
number on the wings) and received 1230 hits on Google including the
historical overview below:

http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk..._S2_XN981.html

Frogdog has left the building
  #5  
Old April 21st 11, 11:37 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Justin Case[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

"tony.anquetil" wrote in
. fr:

This plane is a Blackburn Bucaneer. It was the main attack aircraft
aboard the conventionnal carrier of the Royal Navy.

When the last carrier was scrapped, they were transferred to RAF. In
case of a war against the Warsaw pact, they would have carried
anti-ship missions with the Sea Eagle missile. The 1991 Gulf war might
be its last deployment.


Thanks very much. Was much easier for me to see your typing than the number
on the picture (my eyes, not the monitor's fault).


I apologize for my English. May you correct the sentences?


Never apologize for that! You should hear/see how the majority of us Yanks
dork the language... Government education don't you know.
  #6  
Old April 25th 11, 12:06 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Sojourner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:09:59 +0200, "tony.anquetil"
wrote:

I apologize for my English. May you correct the sentences?

Your English is far, far better than my schoolboy-grade French, so you
really have no need to worry. 8-)

UK English uses "apologise"; "apologize" is American English.

This plane is a Blackburn Bucaneer. It was the main attack aircraft aboard
the conventionnal carrier of the Royal Navy.


conventional

I remember first seeing the Buccaneer at a Farnborough air show. I
think it was referred to as the NA.39 in those days. Nice and loud
using reheat when accelerating fast, though the Lightning and Vulcan,
in their different ways, never disappointed either.

Sojourner
  #7  
Old April 25th 11, 12:59 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Sojourner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default ID anyone? - 1 attachment

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:09:59 +0200, "tony.anquetil"
wrote:

This plane is a Blackburn Bucaneer. It was the main attack aircraft aboard
the conventionnal carrier of the Royal Navy.

When the last carrier was scrapped, they were transferred to RAF. In case of
a war against the Warsaw pact, they would have carried anti-ship missions
with the Sea Eagle missile. The 1991 Gulf war might be its last deployment.

I apologize for my English. May you correct the sentences?

Another thought. If you haven't done so already, take a look on
Youtube. There are several Buccaneer shots there.

Sojourner
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did you know...? - 1 attachment (1/8) Alan[_8_] Aviation Photos 1 April 14th 11 11:26 AM
You can come out now! - 1 attachment Mr. Frugal Aviation Photos 2 January 27th 11 01:45 PM
ID please - 1 attachment Klem Aviation Photos 3 November 8th 08 03:26 AM
AT THE T-LINE - 1 attachment Jim John Aviation Photos 0 July 7th 07 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.