TFRs and ADIZ: The Final Solution

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news4aJc.75462$MB3.32162@attbi_s04...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Moore does get interviews with rabid Bush-hater Tom Daschle and Saddam
sympathizer Jim McDermott. The only reason McDermott has not been
charged
with treason is that he is a Congressman.

Visiting CJ's world is a fascinating escapist diversion.

As opposed to Gary Drescher's world where the real reason for the
terrorist
attacks on the US and the subsequent invasion of Iraq was an enormous
Arab-Bush-al Qaeda conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center as a
pretext
for seizing control of a non-existent pipeline so that Cheney could get
the
contract for his old friends at Halliburton. Seems like there might have
been an easier way to make money, but whatever.

Gary's world has Bush conspiring with Osama bin Laden to destroy the World
Trade Center but alleges that bin Laden knew nothing about the attack.

Well, Mr. Pot, still wanting to call the kettle black.

What you describe as my world is indeed every bit as outlandish as your
world.

The problem with your comparison, though, is that what I refer to as "your
world" consists of things you actually say (e.g. that Rep. McDermott
committed treason), whereas the views you attribute to me resemble nothing
I've ever said.

But that's the salient characteristic of your world: no grounding in reality
is required for attributing bizarre beliefs and attitudes to your opponents.

--Gary

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:24:45 -0700, "C J Campbell"
wrote:

Now, since you can't support your conspiracy theory,

Chris, please provide the Message-ID of the article in THIS message
thread in which you read a statement from me proclaiming a "conspiracy
theory." You're inference of my statements belongs to you; please
don't attribute it to me.

you simply revert to ad hominem attacks against George Bush.

Please also provide the Message-ID of the article in THIS message
thread in which you inferred my statements to be "ad hominem attacks
against George Bush."

Please also respond to my clarification of your misstatement about Mr.
Moore's movie containing a falsehood regarding the existence of a
pipeline through Afghanistan in Message-ID:
.

Recently, G.R. Patterson III posted:

Rosspilot wrote:

Like what, f'rinstance?
www.Rosspilot.com

WNYC carried an interview with another filmmaker who discussed the
film.

Hmm. Could you clear something up for me, please? Did you actually *see*
this movie?

Regards,

Neil

Recently, G.R. Patterson III posted:

George Patterson
In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony
assault. In Tennessee, it's evangelism.

That's the beauty of having States' Rights.

Regards,

Neil

Like what, f'rinstance?
www.Rosspilot.com

WNYC carried an interview with another filmmaker who discussed the
film.

Hmm. Could you clear something up for me, please? Did you actually *see*
this movie?


If you're asking me, the answer is yes.





www.Rosspilot.com

Larry Dighera wrote:

You really should see the movie before you comment on it.

I did not comment on it. I repeated statements from a review of the movie which aired
a few days ago on National Public Radio (WNYC). I stated that in my post. The person
who made those statements saw the movie.

*You* really should read a post before you reply to it.

George Patterson
In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony assault.
In Tennessee, it's evangelism.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:24:07 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:


I did not comment on it. I repeated statements from a review of the movie which aired
a few days ago on National Public Radio (WNYC). I stated that in my post. The person
who made those statements saw the movie.

You should see it also. It might open your eyes a bit.

Then you could make a judgment as to the validity of the opinions you
mouthed.

Recently, G.R. Patterson III posted:

Larry Dighera wrote:

You really should see the movie before you comment on it.

I did not comment on it. I repeated statements from a review of the
movie which aired a few days ago on National Public Radio (WNYC). I
stated that in my post. The person who made those statements saw the
movie.

*You* really should read a post before you reply to it.

Well, I read your post, understood that you were passing on misinformation
given to you by someone else that you apparently were willing to accept as
fact, and wondered why you agreed with it, since it was so off track.
Having read many of your (apparently) helpful posts regarding aviation,
such a tactic makes me wonder about the integrity of those posts, too.

Regards,

Neil

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:09dJc.78376$%_6.15146@attbi_s01...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news4aJc.75462$MB3.32162@attbi_s04...
"C J Campbell" wrote in
message
...
Moore does get interviews with rabid Bush-hater Tom Daschle and
Saddam
sympathizer Jim McDermott. The only reason McDermott has not been
charged
with treason is that he is a Congressman.

Visiting CJ's world is a fascinating escapist diversion.

As opposed to Gary Drescher's world where the real reason for the
terrorist
attacks on the US and the subsequent invasion of Iraq was an enormous
Arab-Bush-al Qaeda conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center as a
pretext
for seizing control of a non-existent pipeline so that Cheney could get
the
contract for his old friends at Halliburton. Seems like there might have
been an easier way to make money, but whatever.

Gary's world has Bush conspiring with Osama bin Laden to destroy the
World
Trade Center but alleges that bin Laden knew nothing about the attack.

Well, Mr. Pot, still wanting to call the kettle black.

What you describe as my world is indeed every bit as outlandish as your
world.

The problem with your comparison, though, is that what I refer to as "your
world" consists of things you actually say (e.g. that Rep. McDermott
committed treason), whereas the views you attribute to me resemble nothing
I've ever said.

Really? Weren't you the one defending Moore's movie? Or do you now deny it?

The truth bites, doesn't it? Sorry, if you think Fahrenheit 9/11 has
anything important to say, then what I said about your fantasies is spot on.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:24:45 -0700, "C J Campbell"
wrote:

Now, since you can't support your conspiracy theory,

Chris, please provide the Message-ID of the article in THIS message
thread in which you read a statement from me proclaiming a "conspiracy
theory." You're inference of my statements belongs to you; please
don't attribute it to me.

you simply revert to ad hominem attacks against George Bush.

Please also provide the Message-ID of the article in THIS message
thread in which you inferred my statements to be "ad hominem attacks
against George Bush."

Please also respond to my clarification of your misstatement about Mr.
Moore's movie containing a falsehood regarding the existence of a
pipeline through Afghanistan in Message-ID:
.

I see. Calling him a drug smuggler more interested in his golf swing than in
doing his job is not an ad hominem attack? Tell me, do you have any evidence
that this is so?