A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

U.S. airlines must now reveal where aircraft were built



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23rd 05, 02:57 PM
Rolf Blom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default U.S. airlines must now reveal where aircraft were built

On 2005-06-23 12:22, Robert J Carpenter wrote:
The problem with ALL the comments on this subject is that the original
story was sloppy reporting.

I think you will find that the rule does NOT say "BUILT", it says
"ASSEMBLED". There's a _world_ of difference (pun intended). A plane
can be _assembled_ in country U, even if every last part comes from
other countries. That would apparently satisfy this labeling law!!!
Yes it's xenophobic and intended to support company B, but the wording
was carefully chosen for the desired effect.



For this final assembly requirement, you could have a plane assembled in
whatever country, except the last non-essential part, fly it to a US
location, and screw in that part.

And the final assembly part is the plaque saying 'made in the US'?


(I recall some stories from long ago when low quality products were made
in a cheap-labour country, and their factories where named after various
other countries and the products were stamped as if made elsewhere.
Though at that time 'made in xxx' was more a quality assurance than
protectionism.)

/Rolf
Ads
  #2  
Old June 23rd 05, 03:58 PM
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rolf Blom" wrote in message
...
On 2005-06-23 12:22, Robert J Carpenter wrote:
The problem with ALL the comments on this subject is that the original
story was sloppy reporting.

I

(I recall some stories from long ago when low quality products were made
in a cheap-labour country, and their factories where named after various
other countries and the products were stamped as if made elsewhere.
Though at that time 'made in xxx' was more a quality assurance than
protectionism.)



Urban Legend

http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/usa.asp


  #3  
Old June 23rd 05, 04:30 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

U.S. airlines must tell passengers where planes were built

How about telling passengers the nationalities of the pilot and flight
crew? Post 9-11 paran^H^H^H^H^Hsecurity measure, no?

Jose
(snipped to r.a.piloting)
--
My other car is up my nose.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #4  
Old June 23rd 05, 08:20 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And what is supposed to be printed on the pants of the pilots????

Tattooed. And notarized.

Jose
--
My other car is up my nose.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #5  
Old June 23rd 05, 09:03 PM
Martin Hotze
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:07:02 -0700, David Herman wrote:

I think it might be at least as interesting to see notices indicating where
*maintenance* was done.

A greater awareness of the practice of US (and probably European) carriers
flying their planes off to overseas bases for maintenance might make for
some interesting discussions.


why?
whoever does the best job for the best price should win the contract
(weired that his has to be explained by a European). I don't want to see
protection of local based businesses ONLY because they are local. If you
don't perform you should do better.

#m
--
http://www.hotze.priv.at/album/aviation/caution.jpg
  #6  
Old June 24th 05, 04:17 AM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think this rule could actually be good.

Imagine the black eye the rabid US politicians would get IF it turns out
that Airbus aircraft have greater US contents than the newer Boeing jets
?

"This Boeing plane was 42% built in the USA"
"This Airbus plane was 43% built in the USA.


Even if Boeing still has greater "made in USA" contents percentage, it
would outline the fact that Boeing is now relying on foreign content and
subsidies to a verty large extent and this would hurt egos in the USA.
  #7  
Old June 24th 05, 05:38 AM
Alan S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:17:33 -0400, nobody
wrote:

I think this rule could actually be good.

Imagine the black eye the rabid US politicians would get IF it turns out
that Airbus aircraft have greater US contents than the newer Boeing jets
?

"This Boeing plane was 42% built in the USA"
"This Airbus plane was 43% built in the USA.

Measured by cost? weight? volume? numbers employed? flow-on
dollars to the community?

Even if Boeing still has greater "made in USA" contents percentage, it
would outline the fact that Boeing is now relying on foreign content and
subsidies to a very large extent and this would hurt egos in the USA.


It's nice to see that the bureaucrats of other countries are
just as silly, in their ivory towers, as ours are.


Cheers, Alan, Australia
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.