Latest Post

Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.


On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:00:08 GMT, "Barney"
wrote in ::


------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C56385.206D95A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1"
META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR
STYLE/STYLE
/HEAD
BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff
DIVFONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2A=20
href=3D"http://www.newbid.net/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=3D11"http://www=
.newbid.net/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=3D11/A/FONT/DIV
DIVFONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2/FONT /DIV
DIVRamp Soon To Go Union..... BRMiddle management is so sure =
Continental=20
Ramp is going union that they told a girl who was trying to transfer to =
CLE that=20
she may have to stay in the ramp if she choose a ramp line as an exit.=20
BRBRAlthough I agree that upper management has done a terrible job =
with the=20
pay reduction........I'm not sure unions are the answer.......the =
pilot,MX,FA=20
have all laid down for CO......Unions are a big money making =
business......when=20
TW,UA,and US went south where were the unions???? Now that CO is in =
trouble=20
.......Is now the right time to add more stress to the airline!! /DIV
DIV!-- Message body ''"" --/DIV/BODY/HTML

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C56385.206D95A0--

Larry Dighera wrote:

Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.

And so for e-mail, too.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.

So... Why'd you re-post it?

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________

Larry Dighera wrote:
Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.


On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:00:08 GMT, "Barney"
wrote in ::

"inapropriate" HTML snipped

"Hey, Mr. Wier is too lazy to roll the wheel on his mouse. Why should
he give a damn if top posting makes followup articles impossible to
follow? Chronology is only important to authors who have
consideration for their readers. :-)"

On Sat, 28 May 2005 23:32:01 -0400, "John T" wrote in
::

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.

So... Why'd you re-post it?

So the OP could see what it looks like to usenet readers who choose
not to display HTML browser output.

On Sat, 28 May 2005 23:41:30 -0400, "JohnH"
wrote in ::

Larry Dighera wrote:
Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.


On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:00:08 GMT, "Barney"
wrote in ::

"inapropriate" HTML snipped

"Hey, Mr. Wier is too lazy to roll the wheel on his mouse. Why should
he give a damn if top posting makes followup articles impossible to
follow? Chronology is only important to authors who have
consideration for their readers. :-)"


Because the HTML code was not really meant to be read by humans, it
was included below my followup.

Larry Dighera wrote:
Please save the HTML for e-mail. It's inappropriate for Usenet.
Thanks.


On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:00:08 GMT, "Barney"
wrote in ::

"inapropriate" HTML snipped

"Hey, Mr. Wier is too lazy to roll the wheel on his mouse. Why
should he give a damn if top posting makes followup articles
impossible to follow? Chronology is only important to authors who
have consideration for their readers. :-)"


Because the HTML code was not really meant to be read by humans, it
was included below my followup.

Lol. Right.