If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
2cernauta2 wrote:
Intruduction courses are much better at retaining new members. Costs are not the main reason for not getting into gliding. Fear is. Gliding is dangerous, IMVHO, or at least perceived as dangerous. I have spoken with quite a number of people who have quit gliding after a few or many years. Cost is the first topic they provide, but if you ask some questions, available time (work, family) is generally the 2nd. The third is having achieved only small goals (or, high expectations and lesser results; results/costs ratio); this is definitely harder to admit for most. Finally, two topics get into play, and I strongly believe they are most important: . the quality of sociality in the club, or the bad quality of human relations (quarrelling between groups of members, disagreements, poor management of the club, sometimes even intrusions in very private aspects of family life...) . safety of the sport. In the 15 years of my gliding career, my phonebook spots a black line in almost every page. Sociality can be very hard to manage, bust must be addressed by the club's management. When fights and quarrelling are going on, and the members feel they have to "choose which side they should stand", or they struggle to keep themselves out of the fight, my experience is that the club will loose about 10percent of its members. And most of the rest are quite unhappy. I expect that commercial operations might be less prone to this problem. If the operator is customer-oriented, of course. Safety, and the achievement of reasonable goals, can in part be addressed by a group of volunteers devoted to personalized, advanced cross-country techiniques. But, it takes some very special kind of people, to stay in gliding for a long time at high level of commitment, like most of us do. We can't expect everyone to be like us. I believe any promotion/retention strategy can't be complete if it doesn't aim at these two topics also. Aldo Cernezzi Fantastic analysis, Aldo. Each of your points are so true. I have seen each one occurring. In particular a lot of casualties, even for very good pilots, even instructors. I would only add that, since only few people will retain the necessary high level of commitment for a long time, it is essential to gain new recruits among young people who are the best fit to begin gliding (learn faster, progress faster, etc.). And i maintain that number one factor why young people interested in this activity don't join is money. For slightly older people it is time. Of course, to attract young people, another essential factor is good social management and the presence of other young people including ladies. You will have hard time to attract young people in a crowd of retirees. To say the truth, in the clubs i have seen, there has always been a steady influx of young guys and girls. But after one of two years, most of them have disappeared by lack of money-time-motivation, whatever. -- Michel TALON |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
On Mar 21, 7:01 am, 2cernauta2 wrote:
On 16 Mar 2007 11:28:12 -0700, "fred" wrote: A question often asked is "Why has the glider activity declined?" A well known ride operator told me that 1800gliderrides expected to sell FOUR MILLION in rides in 2007. I live in Italy, and I base my observations on club-managed soaring activity. Almost no commercial operations are available in my country, and are quite rare in Europe. I believe that promotion of our sport can't benefit from glider rides. Glider riders are expensive, not much fun, and a typical "been there, done that" situation. Intruduction courses are much better at retaining new members. Costs are not the main reason for not getting into gliding. Fear is. Gliding is dangerous, IMVHO, or at least perceived as dangerous. I have spoken with quite a number of people who have quit gliding after a few or many years. Cost is the first topic they provide, but if you ask some questions, available time (work, family) is generally the 2nd. The third is having achieved only small goals (or, high expectations and lesser results; results/costs ratio); this is definitely harder to admit for most. Finally, two topics get into play, and I strongly believe they are most important: . the quality of sociality in the club, or the bad quality of human relations (quarrelling between groups of members, disagreements, poor management of the club, sometimes even intrusions in very private aspects of family life...) . safety of the sport. In the 15 years of my gliding career, my phonebook spots a black line in almost every page. Sociality can be very hard to manage, bust must be addressed by the club's management. When fights and quarrelling are going on, and the members feel they have to "choose which side they should stand", or they struggle to keep themselves out of the fight, my experience is that the club will loose about 10percent of its members. And most of the rest are quite unhappy. I expect that commercial operations might be less prone to this problem. If the operator is customer-oriented, of course. Safety, and the achievement of reasonable goals, can in part be addressed by a group of volunteers devoted to personalized, advanced cross-country techiniques. But, it takes some very special kind of people, to stay in gliding for a long time at high level of commitment, like most of us do. We can't expect everyone to be like us. I believe any promotion/retention strategy can't be complete if it doesn't aim at these two topics also. Aldo Cernezzi Aldo, I agree with your assesment. The social aspect of soaring is the downfall of our sport and the society behind it. Jacek Washington State |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:49:41 +0000 (UTC), (Michel Talon) wrote: Price is LS4-Janus-Pegase 17,40 euros/hour LS 8, 15, 18 mètres 23,50 euros/hour Duo-Discus 30,60 euros/hour Pretty amazing prices (I think at Soissons it's significantly Well it is certainly cheaper where it is impossible to fly. If i look at Vinon's tarifs http://www.vinon-soaring.fr they are exactly of the same order, except the complete "forfait" is more expensive: "FORFAIT HEURES ILLIMITEES Toutes machines : 2200 euros". cheaper). I definitely couldn't have afforded to start up gliding in your club, nor would I have fun today if I calculated the cost for a simple 500 km triangle... Happy to share this deduction with you. This is precisely the point a lot of people are contesting. So i clearly see something of the order of 2000 euros/year, and i am quite sure you will have hard time to find less expensive while still decent around Paris - and by the way i doubt very much it is less expensive in the Alps. I wonder what you are doing with all that money. Do you need to rent your airfield? I have been member of this club, but mainly of Buno-Bonnevaux, which is more expensive but has paid people to do instruction and work on gliders in winter. In my experience, pure volunteer organizations are very unfriendly, and one is happier in more professional ones, even paying more. Anyways, both these clubs have to rent the airfield, of course, pay for cutting grass, for water and electricity, for the installations, for the periodic vists of the gliders, and planes, for reparations, and whatever. Thsese clubs provide detailed expenses to members and i have never seen anything suspicious. In my club (with gliders at least as good as yours) the total cost per year doesn't exceed 600 Euros per year. Yes it is not the first time i hear that prices are infinitely less in Germany. I have never understood how it is possible, since, as i said, the above French prices can be justified very easily, and are homogeneous among similar big clubs with modern fleet. Perhaps you have enormous aids from german state that you are not aware of. From what i have been told, things are worse in Italy, etc. Bye Andreas -- Michel TALON |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
2cernauta2 wrote:
.... Sociality can be very hard to manage, bust must be addressed by the club's management. When fights and quarrelling are going on, and the members feel they have to "choose which side they should stand", or they struggle to keep themselves out of the fight, my experience is that the club will loose about 10percent of its members. And most of the rest are quite unhappy. I expect that commercial operations might be less prone to this problem. If the operator is customer-oriented, of course. Regardless of orientation, commercial operators can fire problems - even if the operator is wrong. At least the level of conflict is reduced and that is more important than being right. Clubs OTOH, have no real means of imposing discipline and conflict is very hard to control. My wife, who lectures and researches in this area tells me that it is actually a wonder that any voluntary association survives for more than 5 years. One feature of gliding clubs that helps them survive is the fixed assets - buildings, site, aircraft, etc - which survive power struggles, splits and personality conflicts. What changes are the people in control. In our area, one club's splits have been the foundation of at least three others which all prosper so there is a positive side! GC |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
There is almost no aid from the German government. However, everey single
work is done by volunteers (including building the very infrastructe) and mostly, launching is done by a winch. Moreover, clubs often started out to build their first (wooden) gliders themselves, and than reselling/renewing on regular intervalls so that after 50 years of that process, their capital base is pretty good (owning the equipments, no loans, often owning the airfield). One of the main sources for that is that Germany has lost both wars, and powered flight was forbidden for years. The result is that anybody wanted to fly turned to gliding... and even today, the density of glider pilots as 3 times higher than in France (make that: 3 times more volunteer work force available to set up things). "Michel Talon" wrote in message ... Andreas Maurer wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:49:41 +0000 (UTC), (Michel Talon) wrote: Price is LS4-Janus-Pegase 17,40 euros/hour LS 8, 15, 18 mètres 23,50 euros/hour Duo-Discus 30,60 euros/hour Pretty amazing prices (I think at Soissons it's significantly Well it is certainly cheaper where it is impossible to fly. If i look at Vinon's tarifs http://www.vinon-soaring.fr they are exactly of the same order, except the complete "forfait" is more expensive: "FORFAIT HEURES ILLIMITEES Toutes machines : 2200 euros". cheaper). I definitely couldn't have afforded to start up gliding in your club, nor would I have fun today if I calculated the cost for a simple 500 km triangle... Happy to share this deduction with you. This is precisely the point a lot of people are contesting. So i clearly see something of the order of 2000 euros/year, and i am quite sure you will have hard time to find less expensive while still decent around Paris - and by the way i doubt very much it is less expensive in the Alps. I wonder what you are doing with all that money. Do you need to rent your airfield? I have been member of this club, but mainly of Buno-Bonnevaux, which is more expensive but has paid people to do instruction and work on gliders in winter. In my experience, pure volunteer organizations are very unfriendly, and one is happier in more professional ones, even paying more. Anyways, both these clubs have to rent the airfield, of course, pay for cutting grass, for water and electricity, for the installations, for the periodic vists of the gliders, and planes, for reparations, and whatever. Thsese clubs provide detailed expenses to members and i have never seen anything suspicious. In my club (with gliders at least as good as yours) the total cost per year doesn't exceed 600 Euros per year. Yes it is not the first time i hear that prices are infinitely less in Germany. I have never understood how it is possible, since, as i said, the above French prices can be justified very easily, and are homogeneous among similar big clubs with modern fleet. Perhaps you have enormous aids from german state that you are not aware of. From what i have been told, things are worse in Italy, etc. Bye Andreas -- Michel TALON |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:21:02 +0000 (UTC), (Michel Talon) wrote: Yes it is not the first time i hear that prices are infinitely less in Germany. I have never understood how it is possible, since, as i said, the above French prices can be justified very easily, and are homogeneous among similar big clubs with modern fleet. Perhaps you have enormous aids from german state that you are not aware of. From what i have been told, things are worse in Italy, etc. This is what puzzles me, too - German clubs have absolutely no aids from German authorities. On the other hand, we don't employ anyone at all - all work is done by the members of the club. From Soissons (which is basically a pure volunteer-driven club) they had to pay one full-time employee who took care of the "tower", airfield and club house. This one guy alone costs more than my club's entire fleet - maybe this is the difference? Sincerely i don't know. At" Moret sur Loing" (CVVFR) there is absolutely nobody employed, so this cannot be the explanation of the numbers i have shown. As far as i know, an important part of the budget goes into building provisions to buy new gliders. If you want to maintain your fleet in reasonably current state, you have to regularly sell old gliders and buy new ones, which are of course more expensive than the old ones you sold. So you have to introduce an input stream of cash, or you have to borrow money, which means paying twice the amount you would have paid if you had made economies. As far as i know the people running the CVVFR were very conscious of this necessity, and have always made provisions. Of course one accident, broken glider, etc. ruins part of these provisions. I think an important factor is also the question of towing. If you have planes, first towing fees introduce an important burden for users, but also for the club, periodic visits are very expensive, etc. But the clubs i know are not in a position to use winches because the airfields are too small. Bye Andreas -- Michel TALON |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
Mogas and microbial growth | Economic Girly Man | Owning | 6 | November 13th 04 09:14 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Aircraft growth (question starting with Art Kramer) | Howard Berkowitz | Military Aviation | 9 | June 6th 04 03:26 PM |
Self launch effect on soaring growth | John Jones | Soaring | 12 | April 27th 04 03:53 AM |