If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
BlackBeard wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. it's a one trick pony, it's faster in horizontal flight. But tis still a truck Vince |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq Wonderful, the "Prince Harry" of military a/c!!! Rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
On Jun 14, 4:28 am, Vince wrote:
BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. The entire aft opens up similar to the C-130. BB I guess everybody has some mountain to climb. It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
BlackBeard wrote:
On Jun 14, 4:28 am, Vince wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. The entire aft opens up similar to the C-130. The door doesn't increase the size of the cabin... IIRC they need a custom vehicle designed to pull any heavy equipment the Marines might try to use because the cabin is so small.. Is it really only 68 inches wide, and 66.23 inches high? That certainly counts as a small cabin.. Heck, two fully equipped Marines are going to have some trouble getting through side by side at the same time... (Equipped with MGs, ATGW, one shot AT weapons etc... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
Kerryn Offord wrote:
BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 14, 4:28 am, Vince wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. The entire aft opens up similar to the C-130. The door doesn't increase the size of the cabin... IIRC they need a custom vehicle designed to pull any heavy equipment the Marines might try to use because the cabin is so small.. Is it really only 68 inches wide, and 66.23 inches high? That certainly counts as a small cabin.. Heck, two fully equipped Marines are going to have some trouble getting through side by side at the same time... (Equipped with MGs, ATGW, one shot AT weapons etc... they have noticed that Vince |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
Vince wrote: they have noticed that What they should have noticed is how that side-by-side rotor layout causes sand and dust to rise around the fuselage during landing, blinding the pilot. That problem should have been noticed back in the XV-15 days: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_XV-15 Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
On Jun 15, 11:47 am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Vince wrote: they have noticed that What they should have noticed is how that side-by-side rotor layout causes sand and dust to rise around the fuselage during landing, blinding the pilot. This differs from any other rotary wing craft how? "5/9/2007 - EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. -- The Air Force Research Laboratory Rapid Reaction Team has successfully integrated and tested a science and technology solution to the Air Force Special Operation Command helicopter brownout problem. In late 2005, Lt. Gen. Michael Wooley, AFSOC commander, asked the AFRL commander to find a solution to a problem that is killing his Airmen -- rotary wing brownouts. More than 30 AFSOC rotary wing aircraft and 60 servicemembers have lost their lives due to reduced visibility conditions during landing in desert environments. Many of the aircraft losses have been attributed to a condition that helicopter pilots refer to as "brownout." "Brownout conditions occur during landing and take-offs from sand or dirt. The sand and dirt is blown up off the ground and blinds the helicopter pilots to the surrounding area, much like being in a whiteout during a blizzard," said Eric Werkowitz, the effort's program manager who is from the Munitions Directorate here. " BB I guess everybody has some mountain to climb. It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
BlackBeard wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:47 am, Pat Flannery wrote: Vince wrote: they have noticed that What they should have noticed is how that side-by-side rotor layout causes sand and dust to rise around the fuselage during landing, blinding the pilot. This differs from any other rotary wing craft how? very very high disk loading with yaw effects 6. HIGH DOWNWASH VELOCITY Because of the high disk-loading of V-22, the downwash velocity is about twice that of any conventional helicopter, and because of the side-by-side placement of the prop-rotors there are two distinct downwash wakes that are transverse to the flight direction. This has several operational implications that bear on safety issues. The most critical one, I believe, is the effects of downwash on landings at night in a desert environment – a challenge in any helicopter, but more difficult, and potentially dangerous, in the V-22. http://www.g2mil.com/V-22safety.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
Vince wrote:
Kerryn Offord wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 14, 4:28 am, Vince wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. The entire aft opens up similar to the C-130. The door doesn't increase the size of the cabin... IIRC they need a custom vehicle designed to pull any heavy equipment the Marines might try to use because the cabin is so small.. Is it really only 68 inches wide, and 66.23 inches high? That certainly counts as a small cabin.. Heck, two fully equipped Marines are going to have some trouble getting through side by side at the same time... (Equipped with MGs, ATGW, one shot AT weapons etc... they have noticed that Vince Is it really that bad? I realize they have to bend over to "walk" out (66.23 inches high is below average height), but can they walk side by side or do they have to depart single file? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey"
Kerryn Offord wrote:
Vince wrote: Kerryn Offord wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 14, 4:28 am, Vince wrote: BlackBeard wrote: On Jun 13, 7:55 pm, Vince wrote: don't worry these china dolls will be kept very far from any real combat. Vince Please clarify "china doll." As we use the term it applies to the fragility or lack of survivability of the platform. Are you now insinuating you know anything about it's combat survivability/susceptibility? Just wondering, because I know that most details of S/S for this platform are classified. And I don't remember you being present during the seven years I was involved with testing those specific systems. BB It will be kept far from anything that might scratch its paint this turkey is a political airplane. It has no clear "combat" mission in Iraq The problems of the V-22 are in its fundamental design. It uses heavy lift horsepower at ultra heavy cost to pick up medium lift cargo which must also fit in its small cabin through a rear door. The entire aft opens up similar to the C-130. The door doesn't increase the size of the cabin... IIRC they need a custom vehicle designed to pull any heavy equipment the Marines might try to use because the cabin is so small.. Is it really only 68 inches wide, and 66.23 inches high? That certainly counts as a small cabin.. Heck, two fully equipped Marines are going to have some trouble getting through side by side at the same time... (Equipped with MGs, ATGW, one shot AT weapons etc... they have noticed that Vince Is it really that bad? I realize they have to bend over to "walk" out (66.23 inches high is below average height), but can they walk side by side or do they have to depart single file? a Marine I talked to said that in combat gear with helmets on it's a sort of alternating single file crouch walk from the seat to the door. its tighter than single file but you have to avoid getting entangled. Vince |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Desktop Wallpaper - "A covey of Osprey". | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Simulators | 0 | June 1st 07 08:41 PM |
"Marine Corps Grounds V-22 Osprey Aircraft" | Mike[_1_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 18th 07 03:40 PM |
V-22 Osprey "ground effect" question | Robert | Naval Aviation | 6 | January 2nd 07 03:44 PM |
OSPREY OPS - "ZIMG_1123.jpg" 123.1 KBytes | Stas | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 9th 06 07:33 PM |
OSPREY OPS - "ZIMG_1125.jpg" 163.7 KBytes | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 8th 06 03:16 PM |