1979 Tiger for Sale

"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" writes:

"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!

And I was going to offer to haul it away to my home airfield for free,
as a favour, of course, to save the expense of a wrecker.


All the best,


David

Proof-positive that God still works miracles!!!

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

I couldn't tell if you were trolling or just stunningly misinformed
and inexperienced. Seeing in another post that you have 110 hours, I'm
going to assume the latter. Your statement abot 'newer is better -
period' is just plain silly. I can show you a late 60s Cessna 182 at
my home airport that will put any new 182 to shame. 100 hour engine,
beautiful paint, great avionics, stunning leather interior. All for
less than 1/2 the cost of a similarly equipped 'new' 182. The owner
bought a 'normal' 182 (with shaky P&I) and had it fixed up *exactly*
the way he wanted it. Since he paid a fraction of the cost of new, he
could afford to have it done his way. Ask any A&P (or even any pilot
with more than 110 hours) and ask them how important airframe age is.
They'll tell you 'not very'. A properly maintained non-pressurized
small plane can fly indefinitely...go do some research in the NTSB
database, you will find *very* few accidents relating to airframe age.

I'd take this 'old' Cessna over a new 182 any day. What exactly can
you do with a new 182 that I couldn't do with this older one, that
cost less than 1/2 the price? Hull insurance is lower, so I save money
on an ongoing basis. On a common, simple plane like a 182 (or even a
not-so common plane like my 1963 Beech Musketeer) maintenence and
parts are not significantly greater in cost than for a much newer
plane. Bournelli's law applies equally to 1963 and 2003 airplanes, so
they both can get the job of flying done. So what? What *exactly*
makes the 2003 plane better?


Cap

"Satellite" wrote in message om...
I don't get into an older than 20 year plane!
And what are you telling me here?
Are you trying to do some loops and steep turns?
Any plane racing in your future?
Handling better - for what?
Newer is better - PERIOD.


"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
.net...
Fly a Tiger and then come back and tell me it handles like a Cessna.


"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back:
How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that.
Your plane is an old pile of junk.
Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172!
They are available from $75000 and up...
Look for yourself www.aso.com
And you get recent avionics, lower time,
nice paint, nice interior, lower insurance,
ad a new engine and you are set...
Your plane... $76000...Ha, what a joke...


"Flynn" wrote in message
news:YpN1b.235442$o%2.106915@sccrnsc02...
Well I've taken the new plane plunge and put a deposit down on a new
SR22
for delivery in late Sept. My wife says I can't have 2 airplanes so
the
Tiger's for sale.

Latest info is at
http://www.ipilot.com/classifieds/ad...&cid=-1&fuid=0
I'm going to take some new pic's today and post them there. Contact
info
if
interested is also at the above site.

Patrick Flynn
Sammamish, WA
79 Tiger N4543A KRNT

$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

Uh....who said anything about selling it for $49,500? Go back to sleep.

"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

Congratulations!!!!

"Flynn" wrote in message
t...
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

Well, there are more idiots than I thought.

"Flynn" wrote in message
news:HlG7b.307842$Oz4.99744@rwcrnsc54...
Uh....who said anything about selling it for $49,500? Go back to sleep.

"Satellite" wrote in message
om...
$49500 is not the original asking price of $76000.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Flynn" wrote:
Sold the Tiger today. Interest was very high so it was priced well.

What!?!? You sold that over-aged "joke" for the asking price?
Unbelievable!!!
:^)

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

"Satellite" writes:

Well, there are more idiots than I thought.

Formosa's Law suggests that we should let this thread rest and move on
to something else.


All the best,


David

No, Formosa's Law is the proof for the equation that says that a Filipino
contortionist is really nothing more than a Manila folder... I think you
mean The Usenet Karma Law -- Dead horse threads not allowed to die always
come back to hoof your behind.

"David Megginson" wrote in message
...
"Satellite" writes:

Well, there are more idiots than I thought.

Formosa's Law suggests that we should let this thread rest and move on
to something else.


All the best,


David