If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Wise wrote:
In article , Guy Alcala wrote: The Chinese have essentially become capitalists today. Just like the Russians too. They just don't like to admit it much. Thieving capitalists who invent nothing and simply copy/counterfeit what the rest of the world creates. Didn't people use to say that about Japan? I don't know. If they did, I wasn't one of them. Yes, they did, in the '50s and early '60s, at least. their products were generally laughed at in the U.S. as poorly made rubbish, often cheap plastic toys and the like. But times change. Simply making cheap quality goods doesn't equate to copying/counterfeiting. Are you saying that after WWII, Japan was the world's biggest infringer of counterfeiting other peoples' work and/or goods? Beats me. ISTR a fair number of big-name knock-offs, but that could be my memory playing me false. But as to copying what others designed, oh yeah, they were accused of that, going back at least into the 1920s. There was some truth to that, as well as a large dose of racism involved -- see US and British attitudes towards Japanese a/c and ship designs prior to WW2. The Japanese undoubtedly borrowed a lot of ideas from others, but they modified them to suit their own needs and added some of their own ideas. Japan does not have a history of openly tolerated theft of intellectual property (media, software, etc.), and I think most of us would agree Japan has created (as opposed to copied) a number of innovative or otherwise excellent products (automotive, cellular, consumer electronics, etc.) The same cannot be said for China. Yet, but then it couldn't be said for Japan either for ca. 30 years after WW2. They started out at the low end, as did e.g. South Korea and Taiwan, Again, you're response continues to ignore the main thrust of my point and that point is not that China makes cheap quality stuff. My point is that China steals (something like 90% of all software, music, and videos) are ripped off copies. And if power revolved around software, music and videos, I'd be fairly concerned. Granted, software piracy can be a serious matter, but music and videos are entertainment. Costly losses to the people involved, but hardly strategic issues. built up their industrial infrastructure and design abilities until their products were able to compete on a world stage. A country's products will never be able to compete on a world stage if that country cannot or will not innovate. As an IT professional, I can say China hasn't produced a single piece of hardware or software that any network or IT professional would even remotely consider deploying...although that doesn't stop them from bootlegging everybody else's work. Then they will stagnate and only provide cheap labor for manufacturing. But given China's history of trading and invention, I expect them to follow the Japanese path. And it's not as if Japan is a world leader in innovative products; they have certainly established a niche especially in consumer electronics, but most of their commercial success has been by making high quality but otherwise conventional products (generally at lower prices, although that's changing) that any industrialised society could manufacture. Is a Lexus more technically innovative than a BMW? No, but it tends to be put together better, and generally costs less. By and large Japan's forte remains incremental improvement and constant refinement of well-made but conventional products. For every innovative company like Honda or Sony, you've got quite a few more Toyotas or Nissans. And unless things have changed, much of Honda's advanced project design work is done in California. I expect China will follow a similar arc - as it is, chances are pretty good that any plush toy or piece of clothing you might buy was made in the PRC. Perhaps. But living in the U.S. city with the largest Chinese community (some 32% of SF's population is Chinese) and in a neighborhood which is well over 70% Chinese, and having kids in a public school which is about 85% Chinese...I have a pretty darn good idea how to discern Chinese products and services. Where possible, I avoid purchasing anything made in China. I've lived in the East Bay all my life, and went to public school with the sort of ethnic mix typical in the Bay Area -- my first girlfriend was Chinese/Japanese as far as her grandparents went. But I fail to see how that has anything to do with being able to discern Chinese products and services. As far as products go, reading "Made in China" on the label seems to work adequately for me. I'm unclear on just what you're trying to do with this skill -- are you carrying out a personal boycott of Chinese goods and services for political/economic reasons, or is there some other reason for your avoidance? Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAAC in China had approved below 116kg aircraft sold in China without airworthiness cetificate | Luo Zheng | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 04 03:50 AM |
"Boeing sale to China skirts ban on technology transfer" | Mike | Military Aviation | 1 | February 6th 04 04:57 AM |
China to buy Eurofighters? | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 90 | December 29th 03 05:16 PM |
Vietnam, any US planes lost in China ? | Mike | Military Aviation | 7 | November 4th 03 11:44 PM |
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA | James | Military Aviation | 2 | October 1st 03 11:25 PM |