A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Understanding Aircraft Composite Construction"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 22nd 03, 02:52 AM
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Understanding Aircraft Composite Construction"

Is anyone familiar with this book, or if there is a better selection out
there to help me decide how large to make my wing ribs?

http://www.aeronautpress.com/book1prev5.htm

The ribs of the Dyke Delta are composed of a stainless steel rib cap
made of .015 thick 321 stainless. It's formed into a U channel with the
sides being double thickness. The bottom of the U is not square, but
must maintain a 4 degree offset.

The rib struts are made of 3/8" piper channel, and everything is held
together and to the spars with nickel-silver brazing. The fiberglass
wing skin is then riveted to the rib caps.

John Dyke, the designer, is on record that the structure could possibly
be made lighter and stronger through the use of more composites. What I
want to investigate is how big I would need to make a composite hat
section to equal the strength of the stainless rib cap, and how big
would a box channel be to equal the piper channel's strength. From that
I can calculate the weight tradeoff, and hopefull have a much easier
construction effort.

PS. My brazing doesn't look so good.
--
----Because I can----
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
------------------------

  #2  
Old July 22nd 03, 06:01 AM
Richard Lamb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ernest Christley wrote:

Is anyone familiar with this book, or if there is a better selection out
there to help me decide how large to make my wing ribs?

http://www.aeronautpress.com/book1prev5.htm

The ribs of the Dyke Delta are composed of a stainless steel rib cap
made of .015 thick 321 stainless. It's formed into a U channel with the
sides being double thickness. The bottom of the U is not square, but
must maintain a 4 degree offset.

The rib struts are made of 3/8" piper channel, and everything is held
together and to the spars with nickel-silver brazing. The fiberglass
wing skin is then riveted to the rib caps.

John Dyke, the designer, is on record that the structure could possibly
be made lighter and stronger through the use of more composites. What I
want to investigate is how big I would need to make a composite hat
section to equal the strength of the stainless rib cap, and how big
would a box channel be to equal the piper channel's strength. From that
I can calculate the weight tradeoff, and hopefull have a much easier
construction effort.

PS. My brazing doesn't look so good.
--
----Because I can----
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
------------------------


Gimme a break, Ernest!

That dam delta is built like the Brooklyn bridge!

Legend goes that John Dyke wanted to try composites, but the
FAA laughed at him and said no way.

With all the long single curved surfaces, the thing begs to
be built from aluminum.

It could be a lot lighter structure.
Probably a lot easier to build too.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong...

Richard
  #3  
Old July 23rd 03, 03:18 AM
CS_Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:08:04 +0000, Ernest Christley wrote:

snip

I agree that this thing is a tank, and I like it that way. A double steel
cage protects you if you go down in the trees, vs the layer of aluminum
foil that you'd have in a Cessna 150.

I'm confused about that FAA comment, though. It's my understanding that
the FAA can laugh all they want, but they don't really have the power to
say yay or nay in regards to material choice. Of course, that may have
been the case 40yrs ago when the design first came out; however, glass
has progressed quite a bit since that time and it is my understanding that
the FAA has progressively moved to a 'just check the paperwork stance' and
is less into checking the actual details.

snip

I personally chose Jyhn Dyke's design because it's primary structure is
not composite. Just a personal preferance tho'.

I did hear that the reason John did'nt design it in glass is that it is
just much easier to do a structural analysis on tube than glass.

Thats my bit,

Mike
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Aircraft Designations Book David R Townend Aerobatics 0 December 1st 03 04:20 AM
Aircraft Designations David Townend Aerobatics 0 September 7th 03 11:52 PM
Aircraft Designations David Townend Home Built 0 July 12th 03 02:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.